Literature DB >> 30253316

Likelihood of cesarean birth among parous women after applying leading active labor diagnostic guidelines.

Jeremy L Neal1, Nancy K Lowe2, Julia C Phillippi3, Nicole S Carlson4, Amy M Knupp5, Mary S Dietrich6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Hospital admission during early labor may increase women's risk for medical and surgical interventions. However, it is unclear which diagnostic guideline is best suited for identifying the active phase of labor among parous women. Dr. Emanuel Friedman, the United Kingdom's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists/Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (ACOG/SMFM) support different active labor diagnostic guidelines. Our aims were (1) to determine the proportions of parous women admitted to the hospital before or in active labor per these leading guidelines and (2) to compare associations of labor status at admission (i.e., early labor or active labor) with oxytocin augmentation, cesarean birth, and adverse birth outcomes when using the different active labor diagnostic guidelines.
DESIGN: Active labor diagnostic guidelines were applied retrospectively to cervical examination data. Binomial logistic regression was used to assess associations of labor status at admission (i.e., early labor relative to active labor) and outcomes.
SETTING: A large, academic, tertiary medical center in the Midwestern United States. PARTICIPANTS: Parous women with spontaneous labor onset who gave birth to a single, cephalic-presenting fetus at term gestation between 2006 and 2010 (n = 3,219).
FINDINGS: At admission, 28.8%, 71.9%, and 24.4% of parous women were in active labor per Friedman, NICE, and ACOG/SMFM diagnostic guidelines, respectively. Oxytocin augmentation was more likely among women admitted in early labor, regardless of the diagnostic strategy used (p < 0.001 for each guideline). Cesarean birth was also more likely among women admitted before versus in active labor according to all guidelines (Friedman: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.63 [95% CI 1.46-9.03]), NICE: AOR 2.71 [95% CI 1.47-4.99]), and ACOG/SMFM: AOR 2.11 [95% CI 1.02-4.34]). There were no differences in a composite measure of adverse outcomes within active labor diagnostic guidelines after adjusting for covariates. KEY
CONCLUSIONS: Many parous women with spontaneous labor onset are admitted to the hospital before active labor. These women are more likely to receive oxytocin augmentation during labor and are more likely to have a cesarean birth. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Diagnosing active labor prior to admission or prior to intervention aimed at speeding labor after admission may decrease likelihoods for primary cesarean births. The NICE dilation-rate based active labor diagnostic guideline is more inclusive than Friedman or ACOG/SMFM guidelines and its use may be the most clinically-useful for improving the likelihood of vaginal birth among parous women.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean section; Labor onset; Labor stage, First; Oxytocin; Parity; Parturition

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30253316      PMCID: PMC6217861          DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  20 in total

1.  Labor in multiparas; a graphicostatistical analysis.

Authors:  E A FRIEDMAN
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1956-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Helain J Landy; D Ware Branch; Ronald Burkman; Shoshana Haberman; Kimberly D Gregory; Christos G Hatjis; Mildred M Ramirez; Jennifer L Bailit; Victor H Gonzalez-Quintero; Judith U Hibbard; Matthew K Hoffman; Michelle Kominiarek; Lee A Learman; Paul Van Veldhuisen; James Troendle; Uma M Reddy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Aaron B Caughey; Alison G Cahill; Jeanne-Marie Guise; Dwight J Rouse
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Computer analysis of labour progression.

Authors:  E A Friedman; B H Kroll
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw       Date:  1969-12

Review 5.  Committee Opinion No. 687: Approaches to Limit Intervention During Labor and Birth.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Differences in inflammatory markers between nulliparous women admitted to hospitals in preactive vs active labor.

Authors:  Jeremy L Neal; Jane M Lamp; Nancy K Lowe; Shannon L Gillespie; Loraine T Sinnott; Donna O McCarthy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  Maternity care access, quality, and outcomes: A systems-level perspective on research, clinical, and policy needs.

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Rachel R Hardeman; Carrie Henning-Smith
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.300

8.  Indications for primary cesarean delivery relative to body mass index.

Authors:  Tetsuya Kawakita; Uma M Reddy; Helain J Landy; Sara N Iqbal; Chun-Chih Huang; Katherine L Grantz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 9.  Parturition dysfunction in obesity: time to target the pathobiology.

Authors:  Nicole S Carlson; Teri L Hernandez; K Joseph Hurt
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 10.  Insights from physiology into myometrial function and dysfunction.

Authors:  Susan Wray
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2015-09-13       Impact factor: 2.969

View more
  2 in total

1.  Challenges in the Triage Care of Low-Risk Laboring Patients: A Comparison of 2 Models of Practice.

Authors:  Rachel Blankstein Breman; Julia C Phillippi; Ellen Tilden; Julie Paul; Erik Barr; Nicole Carlson
Journal:  J Perinat Neonatal Nurs       Date:  2021 Apr-Jun 01       Impact factor: 2.522

2.  Indicators for mode of delivery in pregnant women with uteruses scarred by prior caesarean section: a retrospective study of 679 pregnant women.

Authors:  Zhifen Hua; Fadwa El Oualja
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.007

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.