Literature DB >> 15624052

Three year's experience with the Stretta procedure: did it really make a difference?

R E Lutfi1, A Torquati, J Kaiser, M Holzman, W O Richards.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic treatment is merging as a new option for GERD treatment. Many modalities have been used with modest short-term success, but no long-term follow-ups have been published. We present our 3-yr experience at Vanderbilt University using endoscopic radiofrequency energy (Stretta procedure) for GERD treatment.
METHODS: Patients with follow-up >6 months were prospectively studied under IRB protocol. All were mailed SF-12 health status questionnaire and GERD specific quality-of-life (QOLRAD) questionnaires, queries about satisfaction with Stretta, and medication use. All were invited for 24-hour pH study.
RESULTS: Eighty-six Stretta procedures were performed between 8/2000 and 7/2003 on 85 patients; all were outpatients, 89% under conscious sedation. Seventy-seven patients qualified for the study; 61 completed the survey, 24 returned for pH study. Follow-up was 26.2 +/- 7.5 months (6-36). All were on daily PPIs, with proven GERD by pH study or endoscopy. Mean preoperative acid exposure time was 7.8+/-2.6%, mean DeMeester score was 40.2+/-17.6. Postoperative mean acid exposure time was 5.1+/-3.3 (p=0.001), DeMeester score was 29.5+/-20.5 (p=0.041). Normal postoperative acid exposure time (pH<4 in <4.2%) was achieved in 42% of patients tested. Patients were then divided according to medication use at the end of f/u in 2 groups: Responders (off or >50% decrease in PPI dose), and nonresponders (on >50% of original PPI dose, or had fundoplication). Response rate was 60% (39 patients), 8 nonresponders underwent fundoplication (12%). Satisfaction rate was 73%. Statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups in all measurements; SF-12 physical and mental score for responders were 45.5+/-10.2, and 52.6+/-7.8; and for nonresponders were 37.8+/-11.2 and 40.9+/-11.3 (p=0.012, p=0.0001), respectively. Statistically significant difference was also found between responders and nonresponders in postoperative acid exposure (4.5+/-3.34 vs 7.2+/-2.3, p=0.034), and DeMeester score (26.3+/-20.4 vs 39.7+/-20.2, p=0.05). Paired T test was used to compare pre- and postoperative acid exposure in each group; statistically significant difference was found only among responders: total reflux time was 7.50+/-2.3 preop and 4.5+/-3.34 postop (p=0.0001), whereas for nonresponders it was 8.6+/-3.7 and 7.2+/-2.3 (p=0.8), DeMeester scores pre- and postop among responders were 40.0+/-19.7 and 26.3+/-20.4, respectively (p=0.016), whereas for nonresponders it was 40.5+/-14.3 and 39.7+/-20.2 (p=0.79).
CONCLUSIONS: Stretta is a safe modestly effective, totally endoscopic treatment for GERD. Symptomatic improvement when achieved is often associated with correlating improvement in distal acid exposure. This exposure normalizes in nearly half the treated patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15624052     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-8938-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  34 in total

Review 1.  Endoluminal therapies for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Jean Paul Galmiche; Stanislas Bruley des Varannes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Long-term follow-up study of the Stretta procedure for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  A Torquati; H L Houston; J Kaiser; M D Holzman; W O Richards
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-07-22       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication is an effective treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  R A Hinder; C J Filipi; G Wetscher; P Neary; T R DeMeester; G Perdikis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  First year experience of patients undergoing the Stretta procedure.

Authors:  H Houston; L Khaitan; M Holzman; W O Richards
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The Stretta procedure for the treatment of GERD: 6 and 12 month follow-up of the U.S. open label trial.

Authors:  George Triadafilopoulos; John K DiBaise; Timothy T Nostrant; Neil H Stollman; Paul K Anderson; M Michael Wolfe; Richard I Rothstein; John M Wo; Douglas A Corley; Marco G Patti; Louis V Antignano; John S Goff; Steven A Edmundowicz; Donald O Castell; John C Rabine; Michael S Kim; David S Utley
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 6.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-09-25       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  A physiologic approach to laparoscopic fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  J G Hunter; T L Trus; G D Branum; J P Waring; W C Wood
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; A E Raczek
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Nissen fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Evaluation of primary repair in 100 consecutive patients.

Authors:  T R DeMeester; L Bonavina; M Albertucci
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  A comparison of five maintenance therapies for reflux esophagitis.

Authors:  S Vigneri; R Termini; G Leandro; S Badalamenti; M Pantalena; V Savarino; F Di Mario; G Battaglia; G S Mela; A Pilotto
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-10-26       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Endoluminal and transluminal surgery: current status and future possibilities.

Authors:  A Malik; J D Mellinger; J W Hazey; B J Dunkin; B V MacFadyen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Endolumenal therapies for gastroesophageal reflux disease: are they dead?

Authors:  Jonathan P Pearl; Jeffrey M Marks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Endoscopic treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease: should you learn the techniques?

Authors:  Julia J Liu
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.522

4.  The Stretta procedure versus proton pump inhibitors and laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication in the management of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Dan Comay; Viviane Adam; Ediardo B da Silveira; Wendy Kennedy; Serge Mayrand; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.522

5.  Mind the Gap: Current Treatment Alternatives for GERD Patients Failing Medical Treatment and Not Ready for a Fundoplication.

Authors:  Phuong Huynh; Vani Konda; Suchakree Sanguansataya; Marc A Ward; Steven G Leeds
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 1.719

Review 6.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled and prospective cohort efficacy studies of endoscopic radiofrequency for treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Ronnie Fass; Frederick Cahn; Dennis J Scotti; David A Gregory
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Endoluminal fundoplication by a transoral device for the treatment of GERD: A feasibility study.

Authors:  G B Cadière; A Rajan; O Germay; J Himpens
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Stretta Radiofrequency Treatment for GERD: A Safe and Effective Modality.

Authors:  Mark Franciosa; George Triadafilopoulos; Hiroshi Mashimo
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 2.260

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.