Literature DB >> 15619106

An evaluation of the sensitivity of the Standardised Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs) to detect impairment due to marijuana intoxication.

K Papafotiou1, J D Carter, C Stough.   

Abstract

The Standardised Field Sobriety Tests (SFST) were developed to test for alcohol intoxication but are currently being used by the State Police of Victoria (Australia) to test for driving impairment associated with drugs other than alcohol. The aim of the present study was to assess whether the SFSTs provide a sensitive measure of impairment following the consumption of a drug other than alcohol: delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC or cannabis). In a repeated-measures design, 40 participants consumed cigarettes that contained either 0% THC (placebo), 1.74% THC (low dose) or 2.93% THC (high dose). For each condition, after smoking a cigarette, participants performed the SFSTs on three occasions: 5 min (Time 1), 55 min (Time 2) and 105 min (Time 3) after the smoking procedure had been completed. The results revealed that there was a positive relationship between the dose of THC administered and the number of participants classified as impaired based on the SFSTs. Results also revealed that the percentage of participants classified as impaired decreased from Time 1 to Time 3 and that the addition of a new sign, head movements or jerks (HMJ), increased the percentage of participants classified as impaired in both the low and high THC conditions. These findings suggest that impaired performance on the SFSTs is positively related to the dose of THC administered and that the inclusion of HMJ as a scored sign in the SFSTs improves their predictive validity when testing for THC intoxication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15619106     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-004-2119-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  10 in total

Review 1.  Drugs of abuse monitoring in blood for control of driving under the influence of drugs.

Authors:  Manfred R Moeller; Thomas Kraemer
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.681

2.  Drugs driving--standardized field sobriety tests: a survey of police surgeons in Strathclyde.

Authors:  M O'Keefe
Journal:  J Clin Forensic Med       Date:  2001-06

3.  Laboratory validation study of drug evaluation and classification program: ethanol, cocaine, and marijuana.

Authors:  S J Heishman; E G Singleton; D J Crouch
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.367

4.  Marihuana and driving.

Authors:  H Moskowitz
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  1985-08

5.  Effects of cannabis and alcohol on automobile driving and psychomotor tracking.

Authors:  R W Hansteen; R D Miller; L Lonero; L D Reid; B Jones
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Acute and residual effects of marijuana in humans.

Authors:  R V Fant; S J Heishman; E B Bunker; W B Pickworth
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  The incidence of drugs in drivers killed in Australian road traffic crashes.

Authors:  Olaf H Drummer; Jim Gerostamoulos; Helen Batziris; Mark Chu; John R M Caplehorn; Michael D Robertson; Philip Swann
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 8.  Dose related risk of motor vehicle crashes after cannabis use.

Authors:  J G Ramaekers; G Berghaus; M van Laar; O H Drummer
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2004-02-07       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 9.  Relating blood concentrations of tetrahydrocannabinol and metabolites to pharmacologic effects and time of marijuana usage.

Authors:  E J Cone; M A Huestis
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.681

10.  The involvement of drugs in drivers of motor vehicles killed in Australian road traffic crashes.

Authors:  Olaf H Drummer; Jim Gerostamoulos; Helen Batziris; Mark Chu; John Caplehorn; Michael D Robertson; Philip Swann
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2004-03
  10 in total
  12 in total

1.  The effect of d,l-methamphetamine on simulated driving performance.

Authors:  Beata Y Silber; Rodney J Croft; Luke A Downey; David A Camfield; Katherine Papafotiou; Phillip Swann; Con Stough
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-08-13       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Detecting impairment associated with cannabis with and without alcohol on the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests.

Authors:  Luke A Downey; Rebecca King; Katherine Papafotiou; Phillip Swann; Edward Ogden; Martin Boorman; Con Stough
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  An evaluation of the sensitivity of the standardised field sobriety tests to detect the presence of amphetamine.

Authors:  Beata Y Silber; Katherine Papafotiou; Rodney J Croft; Con K K Stough
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Implications of plasma Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol, 11-hydroxy-THC, and 11-nor-9-carboxy-THC concentrations in chronic cannabis smokers.

Authors:  Erin L Karschner; Eugene W Schwilke; Ross H Lowe; W David Darwin; Ronald I Herning; Jean Lud Cadet; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.367

Review 5.  A Judicial Perspective on Expert Testimony in Marijuana Driving Cases.

Authors:  Mary A Celeste
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-19

6.  Effects of High-Potency Cannabis on Psychomotor Performance in Frequent Cannabis Users.

Authors:  Hollis C Karoly; Michael A Milburn; Ashley Brooks-Russell; Mary Brown; Jessica Streufert; Angela D Bryan; Nicholas P Lovrich; William DeJong; L Cinnamon Bidwell
Journal:  Cannabis Cannabinoid Res       Date:  2020-09-10

7.  Roadside sobriety tests and attitudes toward a regulated cannabis market.

Authors:  Alison Looby; Mitch Earleywine; Dale Gieringer
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2007-01-31

8.  The methodological quality of three foundational law enforcement Drug Influence Evaluation validation studies.

Authors:  Greg Kane
Journal:  J Negat Results Biomed       Date:  2013-11-04

9.  A placebo-controlled study to assess Standardized Field Sobriety Tests performance during alcohol and cannabis intoxication in heavy cannabis users and accuracy of point of collection testing devices for detecting THC in oral fluid.

Authors:  W M Bosker; E L Theunissen; S Conen; K P C Kuypers; W K Jeffery; H C Walls; G F Kauert; S W Toennes; M R Moeller; J G Ramaekers
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Assessment of cognitive and psychomotor impairment, subjective effects, and blood THC concentrations following acute administration of oral and vaporized cannabis.

Authors:  Tory R Spindle; Erin L Martin; Megan Grabenauer; Thomas Woodward; Michael A Milburn; Ryan Vandrey
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.