Literature DB >> 14642878

The involvement of drugs in drivers of motor vehicles killed in Australian road traffic crashes.

Olaf H Drummer1, Jim Gerostamoulos, Helen Batziris, Mark Chu, John Caplehorn, Michael D Robertson, Philip Swann.   

Abstract

A multi-center case-control study was conducted on 3398 fatally-injured drivers to assess the effect of alcohol and drug use on the likelihood of them being culpable. Crashes investigated were from three Australian states (Victoria, New South Wales and Western Australia). The control group of drug- and alcohol-free drivers comprised 50.1% of the study population. A previously validated method of responsibility analysis was used to classify drivers as either culpable or non-culpable. Cases in which the driver "contributed" to the crash (n=188) were excluded. Logistic regression was used to examine the association of key attributes such as age, gender, type of crash and drug use on the likelihood of culpability. Drivers positive to psychotropic drugs were significantly more likely to be culpable than drug-free drivers. Drivers with Delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in their blood had a significantly higher likelihood of being culpable than drug-free drivers (odds ratio (OR) 2.7, 95% CI 1.02-7.0). For drivers with blood THC concentrations of 5 ng/ml or higher the odds ratio was greater and more statistically significant (OR 6.6, 95% CI 1.5-28.0). The estimated odds ratio is greater than that for drivers with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.10-0.15% (OR 3.7, 95% CI 1.5-9.1). A significantly stronger positive association with culpability was seen with drivers positive to THC and with BAC > or =0.05% compared with BAC > or =0.05 alone (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1-7.7). Strong associations were also seen for stimulants, particularly in truck drivers. There were non-significant, weakly positive associations of opiates and benzodiazepines with culpability. Drivers positive to any psychoactive drug were significantly more likely to be culpable (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.4). Gender differences were not significant, but differences were apparent with age. Drivers showing the highest culpability rates were in the under 25 and over 65 age groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14642878     DOI: 10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00153-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Accid Anal Prev        ISSN: 0001-4575


  82 in total

1.  Responsibility study: main illicit psychoactive substances among car drivers involved in fatal road crashes.

Authors:  Blandine Gadegbeku; Emmanuelle Amoros; Bernard Laumon
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2011

2.  Effects of d-amphetamine on simulated driving performance before and after sleep deprivation.

Authors:  Magnus Hjälmdahl; Anna Vadeby; Asa Forsman; Carina Fors; Gunnel Ceder; Per Woxler; Robert Kronstrand
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-05-26       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Cannabis legalization: adhering to public health best practice.

Authors:  Sheryl Spithoff; Brian Emerson; Andrea Spithoff
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  The effects of dexamphetamine on simulated driving performance.

Authors:  B Y Silber; K Papafotiou; R J Croft; E Ogden; P Swann; C Stough
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Cannabis intoxication and fatal road crashes in France: population based case-control study.

Authors:  Bernard Laumon; Blandine Gadegbeku; Jean-Louis Martin; Marie-Berthe Biecheler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-12-01

6.  The impact of cannabis on driving.

Authors:  Michel Bédard; Sacha Dubois; Bruce Weaver
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2007 Jan-Feb

7.  Crash culpability and the role of driver blood alcohol levels.

Authors:  Joseph A Kufera; Carl A Soderstrom; Patricia C Dischinger; Shiu M Ho; Angela Shepard
Journal:  Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med       Date:  2006

8.  Drugs and driving: when science and policy don't mix.

Authors:  Mark Asbridge
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug

9.  An evaluation of the sensitivity of the Standardised Field Sobriety Tests (SFSTs) to detect impairment due to marijuana intoxication.

Authors:  K Papafotiou; J D Carter; C Stough
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-12-24       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 10.  Cannabis effects on driving skills.

Authors:  Rebecca L Hartman; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 8.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.