Literature DB >> 22763669

Detecting impairment associated with cannabis with and without alcohol on the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests.

Luke A Downey1, Rebecca King, Katherine Papafotiou, Phillip Swann, Edward Ogden, Martin Boorman, Con Stough.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Cannabis and alcohol are the most popular drugs amongst recreational users and most prevalent in injured and deceased drivers. The Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFST) are commonly used to establish impairment due to drugs and alcohol, but limited empirical evidence exists concerning the combined effects of these drugs on SFST performance.
METHODS: The sample comprised 80 individuals (31 females; 49 males). Age ranged between 21 and 35 years (M = 26.5, SD = 5). Forty participants (15 females; 25 males) took part in the low alcohol condition (BAC, <0.05 %), and 40 participants (16 females; 24 males), took part in the high alcohol condition (BAC, >0.05 %). For each part of the study, two levels of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) were administered (1.8 and 3 % THC) or a matching placebo cigarette (0 % THC) in combination with alcohol. Performance on the SFST was assessed 30 min post-dosing.
RESULTS: A number of significant differences in SFST performance were identified with 28 % of the sample failing the test (when the head movement and jerks sign was included) when low alcohol and low THC were administered together. When a higher dose of alcohol was administered with a low dose of THC, 38 % of the sample failed the test, and 35 % also failed when the high dose of alcohol was combined with a higher dose of THC.
CONCLUSIONS: The current results highlight the limited ability of the SFST to identify drug consumption in the absence of any evidence of driving impairment or physiological indicators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22763669     DOI: 10.1007/s00213-012-2787-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  17 in total

Review 1.  Drugs of abuse monitoring in blood for control of driving under the influence of drugs.

Authors:  Manfred R Moeller; Thomas Kraemer
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.681

2.  Validation of the standardized field sobriety test battery at 0.08% blood alcohol concentration.

Authors:  Jack Stuster
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.888

3.  The Victorian legislative framework for testing drivers for impairment caused by drugs other than alcohol: an evaluation of the characteristics of drivers detected from 2000 to 2005.

Authors:  Martin Boorman; Katherine Papafotiou
Journal:  Traffic Inj Prev       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.491

4.  Effects of THC on driving performance, physiological state and subjective feelings relative to alcohol.

Authors:  Adi Ronen; Pnina Gershon; Hanan Drobiner; Alex Rabinovich; Rachel Bar-Hamburger; Raphael Mechoulam; Yair Cassuto; David Shinar
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2007-11-26

5.  Marijuana, alcohol and actual driving performance.

Authors:  J. G. Ramaekers; H. W. J. Robbe; J. F. O'Hanlon
Journal:  Hum Psychopharmacol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.672

6.  Examining the effect of dl-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and methamphetamine on the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests.

Authors:  Luke A Downey; Rebecca King; Katherine Papafotiou; Phillip Swann; Edward Ogden; Con Stough
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 7.  Dose related risk of motor vehicle crashes after cannabis use.

Authors:  J G Ramaekers; G Berghaus; M van Laar; O H Drummer
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2004-02-07       Impact factor: 4.492

8.  Drugs in oral fluid in randomly selected drivers.

Authors:  Olaf H Drummer; Dimitri Gerostamoulos; Mark Chu; Philip Swann; Martin Boorman; Ian Cairns
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 2.395

9.  The involvement of drugs in drivers of motor vehicles killed in Australian road traffic crashes.

Authors:  Olaf H Drummer; Jim Gerostamoulos; Helen Batziris; Mark Chu; John Caplehorn; Michael D Robertson; Philip Swann
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2004-03

10.  A placebo-controlled study to assess Standardized Field Sobriety Tests performance during alcohol and cannabis intoxication in heavy cannabis users and accuracy of point of collection testing devices for detecting THC in oral fluid.

Authors:  W M Bosker; E L Theunissen; S Conen; K P C Kuypers; W K Jeffery; H C Walls; G F Kauert; S W Toennes; M R Moeller; J G Ramaekers
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  3 in total

1.  Sex differences in driving under the influence of cannabis: The role of medical and recreational cannabis use.

Authors:  Shawnta L Lloyd; Catalina Lopez-Quintero; Catherine W Striley
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 2.  The why behind the high: determinants of neurocognition during acute cannabis exposure.

Authors:  Johannes G Ramaekers; Natasha L Mason; Lilian Kloft; Eef L Theunissen
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Preliminary Eye-Tracking Data as a Nonintrusive Marker for Blood Δ-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Concentration and Drugged Driving.

Authors:  Ali Shahidi Zandi; Felix J E Comeau; Robert E Mann; Patricia Di Ciano; Eliyas P Arslan; Thomas Murphy; Bernard Le Foll; Christine M Wickens
Journal:  Cannabis Cannabinoid Res       Date:  2021-08-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.