Literature DB >> 15618996

Requirements for DXA for the management of osteoporosis in Europe.

J A Kanis1, O Johnell.   

Abstract

The availability of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) varies markedly in different countries. There is, however, little information to indicate the optimal requirements for this technology. The principal aim of this study was to estimate the requirements for DXA in Europe for the assessment and treatment of osteoporosis. Three assessment scenarios were chosen. The first envisaged screening of all women with DXA at the age of 65 years. A second scenario comprised a screening programme based on the identification of clinical risk factors with the selective addition of BMD tests in those close to an intervention threshold. The third scenario envisaged a case finding strategy where women aged 65 years were identified on the basis of risk factors and referred for DXA. Requirements for women aged more than 65 years were amortised over a 10-year period. A secondary aim was to estimate the number and cost of osteoporotic fractures in Europe. The requirements for DXA in assessment ranged from 4.21 to 11.21 units/million of the population. The most efficient assessment scenario was the use of clinical risk factors with the selective use of BMD. With this scenario, an additional 6.39 units/million would be required to monitor treatment giving a total requirement of 10.6 units/million. In 2000, the number of osteoporotic fractures was estimated at 3.79 million, of which 0.89 million were hip fractures (179,000 hip fractures in men and 711,000 in women). The total direct costs were estimated at 31.7 billion Euros (21.165 billion UK pounds), which were expected to increase to 76.7 billion Euros (51.1 billion UK pounds) in 2050 based on the expected changes in the demography of Europe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15618996     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-004-1811-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  34 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of established osteoporosis: a systematic review and cost-utility analysis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; J E Brazier; M Stevenson; N W Calvert; M Lloyd Jones
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; B Jonsson; C de Laet; A Dawson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  An update on the diagnosis and assessment of osteoporosis with densitometry. Committee of Scientific Advisors, International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  J A Kanis; C C Glüer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease.

Authors:  J A Kanis; P Delmas; P Burckhardt; C Cooper; D Torgerson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  The hospital burden of vertebral fracture in Europe: a study of national register sources.

Authors:  O Johnell; B Gullberg; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Management of osteoporosis in women with peripheral osteoporotic fractures after 50 years of age: a study of practices.

Authors:  Daniel Briançon; Jean-Baptiste de Gaudemar; Romain Forestier
Journal:  Joint Bone Spine       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.929

7.  International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Olof Johnell; Chris De Laet; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Alan K Ogelsby
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 8.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  The apparent incidence of hip fracture in Europe: a study of national register sources.

Authors:  O Johnell; B Gullberg; E Allander; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Performance of clinical referral criteria for bone densitometry in patients under 65 years of age assessed by spine bone mineral density.

Authors:  K Kayan; D de Takats; R Ashford; J A Kanis; E V McCloskey
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.401

View more
  136 in total

Review 1.  New targets for intervention in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 20.543

2.  Obesity is not protective against fracture in postmenopausal women: GLOW.

Authors:  Juliet E Compston; Nelson B Watts; Roland Chapurlat; Cyrus Cooper; Steven Boonen; Susan Greenspan; Johannes Pfeilschifter; Stuart Silverman; Adolfo Díez-Pérez; Robert Lindsay; Kenneth G Saag; J Coen Netelenbos; Stephen Gehlbach; Frederick H Hooven; Julie Flahive; Jonathan D Adachi; Maurizio Rossini; Andrea Z Lacroix; Christian Roux; Philip N Sambrook; Ethel S Siris
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 3.  Development and use of FRAX in osteoporosis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; E V McCloskey; H Johansson; A Oden; O Ström; F Borgström
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Targeted education improves the very low recognition of vertebral fractures and osteoporosis management by general internists.

Authors:  P Casez; B Uebelhart; J-M Gaspoz; S Ferrari; M Louis-Simonet; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Risk factors for fragility fracture in middle age. A prospective population-based study of 33,000 men and women.

Authors:  A H Holmberg; O Johnell; P M Nilsson; J Nilsson; G Berglund; K Akesson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Use of dental panoramic radiographs in identifying younger postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Authors:  Akira Taguchi; Mikio Tsuda; Masahiko Ohtsuka; Ichiro Kodama; Mitsuhiro Sanada; Takashi Nakamoto; Koji Inagaki; Toshihide Noguchi; Yoshiki Kudo; Yoshikazu Suei; Keiji Tanimoto; Anne-Marie Bollen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  A nomogram for predicting osteoporosis risk based on age, weight and quantitative ultrasound measurement.

Authors:  C Pongchaiyakul; S Panichkul; T Songpatanasilp; T V Nguyen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  FRAX-based intervention and assessment thresholds for osteoporosis in Iran.

Authors:  P Khashayar; A Keshtkar; A Ostovar; B Larijani; H Johansson; N C Harvey; M Lorentzon; E McCloskey; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Improvement of region of interest extraction and scanning method of computer-aided diagnosis system for osteoporosis using panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Takashi Nakamoto; Akira Taguchi; Rinus Gerardus Verdonschot; Naoya Kakimoto
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 1.852

10.  The effect of behavioural risk factors on osteoporosis in Irish women.

Authors:  N M Cummins; P M Jakeman; I Sestak; N Murphy; P Carroll
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2012-07-28       Impact factor: 1.568

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.