Literature DB >> 16758137

Targeted education improves the very low recognition of vertebral fractures and osteoporosis management by general internists.

P Casez1, B Uebelhart, J-M Gaspoz, S Ferrari, M Louis-Simonet, R Rizzoli.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Vertebral fractures in older persons are strong predictors of subsequent fracture risk but remain largely under-recognized. To evaluate the impact of an educational intervention on the recognition of vertebral fractures and the prescription of anti-osteoporosis treatment among general internists, we conducted a prospective study in a service of general internal medicine of a large university teaching hospital in Geneva, Switzerland. During a 3.5-month observation period (phase 1), all lateral spinal or chest radiographs performed on consecutive inpatients over 60 years were reviewed by two independent investigators, and vertebral fractures were graded according to their severity.
METHODS: Results were compared with radiology reports and general internists' discharge summaries. During the following 2-month intervention period (phase 2), internists were actively educated about vertebral fracture identification by means of lectures, posters and flyers. Radiologists did not receive this educational strategy and served as controls.
RESULTS: Among 292 consecutive patients (54% men; range: 60-97 years) included in phase 1, 85 (29%) were identified by investigators as having at least one vertebral fracture; radiologists detected 29 (34%), and internists detected 19 (22%). During the intervention phase, 58 (34%) of 172 patients were identified with vertebral fractures by investigators; radiologists detected 13 patients (22%) whereas among internists the detection rate almost doubled (25/58 patients, 43%; p=0.008 compared to phase 1). The percentage of patients with vertebral fracture who benefitted from an osteoporosis medical management increased from 11% (phase 1) to 40% (phase 2, p<0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings confirm the large under-recognition of vertebral fractures, irrespective of their severity, and demonstrate that a simple educational strategy can significantly improve their detection on routine radiographs and, consequently, improve osteoporosis management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16758137     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-0064-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  38 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: importance of recognition and description by radiologists.

Authors:  Leon Lenchik; Lee F Rogers; Pierre D Delmas; Harry K Genant
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Clinical consequences of vertebral fractures.

Authors:  P D Ross
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1997-08-18       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women.

Authors:  L J Melton; S H Kan; M A Frye; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; B L Riggs
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study.

Authors:  J R Center; T V Nguyen; D Schneider; P N Sambrook; J A Eisman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-03-13       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting.

Authors:  S H Gehlbach; C Bigelow; M Heimisdottir; S May; M Walker; J R Kirkwood
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Incidental vertebral fractures discovered with chest radiography in the emergency department: prevalence, recognition, and osteoporosis management in a cohort of elderly patients.

Authors:  Sumit R Majumdar; Nancy Kim; Ian Colman; Anthony M Chahal; Gregory Raymond; Ho Jen; Kerry G Siminoski; David A Hanley; Brian H Rowe
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-04-25

7.  Correcting calcium nutritional deficiency prevents spine fractures in elderly women.

Authors:  R R Recker; S Hinders; K M Davies; R P Heaney; M R Stegman; J M Lappe; D B Kimmel
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Prevalent vertebral deformities predict increased mortality and increased fracture rate in both men and women: a 10-year population-based study of 598 individuals from the Swedish cohort in the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study.

Authors:  R Hasserius; M K Karlsson; B E Nilsson; I Redlund-Johnell; O Johnell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures: results from the MORE trial.

Authors:  P D Delmas; H K Genant; G G Crans; J L Stock; M Wong; E Siris; J D Adachi
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  H K Genant; M Jergas; L Palermo; M Nevitt; R S Valentin; D Black; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  7 in total

1.  Impact of level of expertise versus the statistical tool on vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) readings in cohort studies.

Authors:  B Aubry-Rozier; I Fabreguet; K Iglesias; O Lamy; D Hans
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Incidental vertebral compression fractures in imaging studies: Lessons not learned by radiologists.

Authors:  Tommaso Bartalena; Maria Francesca Rinaldi; Cecilia Modolon; Lucia Braccaioli; Nicola Sverzellati; Giuseppe Rossi; Eugenio Rimondi; Maurizio Busacca; Ugo Albisinni; Donald Resnick
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-28

3.  Higher rates of osteoporosis treatment initiation and persistence in patients with newly diagnosed vertebral fracture when introduced in inpatients than later in outpatients.

Authors:  H Spechbach; I Fabreguet; E Saule; M Hars; J Stirnemann; S Ferrari; R Rizzoli; T Chevalley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Opportunistic diagnosis of osteoporotic vertebral fractures on standard imaging performed for alternative indications.

Authors:  Shane W Davy; Diane Bergin
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2021-12-17

Review 5.  Interventions for improving the appropriate use of imaging in people with musculoskeletal conditions.

Authors:  Simon D French; Sally Green; Rachelle Buchbinder; Hayley Barnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

Review 6.  Risks and benefits of percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty in the management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  O Lamy; B Uebelhart; B Aubry-Rozier
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Vertebral fracture: epidemiology, impact and use of DXA vertebral fracture assessment in fracture liaison services.

Authors:  W F Lems; J Paccou; J Zhang; N R Fuggle; M Chandran; N C Harvey; C Cooper; K Javaid; S Ferrari; K E Akesson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 4.507

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.