Literature DB >> 14612601

Performance of clinical referral criteria for bone densitometry in patients under 65 years of age assessed by spine bone mineral density.

K Kayan1, D de Takats, R Ashford, J A Kanis, E V McCloskey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A case finding strategy based on a number of established risk factors has been suggested by Royal College of Physicians' (RCP) guidelines to optimise bone densitometry referrals for assessment of osteoporosis.
OBJECTIVE: The performance of clinical referral criteria was examined in women and men aged <65 years referred for bone mineral density (BMD) assessment. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross sectional observational study over six months.
RESULTS: Though BMD tended to be lower in patients with multiple criteria for referral, differences from those referred with a single criterion were not statistically significant. The overall prevalence of osteoporosis was higher than expected in both sexes, 11.6% in women and 27.5% in men (expected prevalences were 8% and <1% respectively). BMD was significantly lower in patients referred with a single criterion compatible with the RCP guidelines than in age matched controls or in those patients referred with non-RCP criteria (mean (SD) Z score -0.47(1.38) v 0.35(1.41), p<0.001). Low body mass index was also significantly associated with a lower than expected BMD. In contrast, spine BMD was higher than expected in those with self reported back pain, loss of height, or spinal curvature (p = NS).
CONCLUSION: Most of the criteria recommended by the RCP performed well in identifying relatively younger patients with low BMD and osteoporosis. However, prior fractures and corticosteroid use did not reach statistical significance probably due to inclusion of all energy fractures, and current or past steroid use of unspecified dose or duration. Criteria like loss of height and/or spine curvature perform relatively poorly, reflecting the need for further investigation to better identify those needing BMD assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14612601      PMCID: PMC1742850          DOI: 10.1136/pmj.79.936.581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  10 in total

1.  Screening for osteoporosis: a clinical, social, and economic dilemma.

Authors:  L G Raisz; L P Weicker
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  Screening for osteoporosis.

Authors:  L J Melton; D M Eddy; C C Johnston
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Pre-existing risk factor profiles in users and non-users of hormone replacement therapy: prospective cohort study in Gothenburg, Sweden.

Authors:  K Rödström; C Bengtsson; L Lissner; C Björkelund
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-10-02

Review 4.  Bone densitometry in clinical practice.

Authors:  J E Compston; C Cooper; J A Kanis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-06-10

Review 5.  Is screening for osteoporosis worthwhile?

Authors:  K Walker-Bone; D M Reid; C Cooper
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 6.  A review of bone mineral density scans referred by a community-based menopause clinic in 1997.

Authors:  A Miles; K E Weaver; A Glasier
Journal:  Br J Fam Plann       Date:  2000-07

7.  Prevalence of osteoporosis and related risk factors in UK women in the seventh decade: osteoporosis case finding by clinical referral criteria or predictive model?

Authors:  P A Ballard; D W Purdie; C M Langton; S A Steel; S Mussurakis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Prevalent vertebral deformities: relationship to bone mineral density and spinal osteophytosis in elderly men and women.

Authors:  G Jones; C White; T Nguyen; P N Sambrook; P J Kelly; J A Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  D Marshall; O Johnell; H Wedel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-05-18

10.  Effect of spinal osteophytosis on bone mineral density measurements in vertebral osteoporosis.

Authors:  T Masud; S Langley; P Wiltshire; D V Doyle; T D Spector
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-17
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Requirements for DXA for the management of osteoporosis in Europe.

Authors:  J A Kanis; O Johnell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-24       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Sensitivity of osteoporosis screening guidelines for eventual hip fracture in older male veterans.

Authors:  Juliessa M Pavon; Linda L Sanders; Richard Sloane; Cathleen Colón-Emeric
Journal:  Bonekey Rep       Date:  2014-05-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.