Literature DB >> 15618417

Site preferences of insertional mutagenesis agents in Arabidopsis.

Xiaokang Pan1, Yong Li, Lincoln Stein.   

Abstract

We have performed a comparative analysis of the insertion sites of engineered Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) insertional mutagenesis vectors that are based on the maize (Zea mays) transposable elements and Agrobacterium T-DNA. The transposon-based agents show marked preference for high GC content, whereas the T-DNA-based agents show preference for low GC content regions. The transposon-based agents show a bias toward insertions near the translation start codons of genes, while the T-DNAs show a predilection for the putative transcriptional regulatory regions of genes. The transposon-based agents also have higher insertion site densities in exons than do the T-DNA insertions. These observations show that the transposon-based and T-DNA-based mutagenesis techniques could complement one another well, and neither alone is sufficient to achieve the goal of saturation mutagenesis in Arabidopsis. These results also suggest that transposon-based mutagenesis techniques may prove the most effective for obtaining gene disruptions and for generating gene traps, while T-DNA-based agents may be more effective for activation tagging and enhancer trapping. From the patterns of insertion site distributions, we have identified a set of nucleotide sequence motifs that are overrepresented at the transposon insertion sites. These motifs may play a role in the transposon insertion site preferences. These results could help biologists to study the mechanisms of insertions of the insertional mutagenesis agents and to design better strategies for genome-wide insertional mutagenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15618417      PMCID: PMC548848          DOI: 10.1104/pp.104.053215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  30 in total

1.  Analysis of flanking sequences from dissociation insertion lines: a database for reverse genetics in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  S Parinov; M Sevugan; D Ye; W C Yang; M Kumaran; V Sundaresan
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  A web site for the computational analysis of yeast regulatory sequences.

Authors:  J van Helden; B André; J Collado-Vides
Journal:  Yeast       Date:  2000-01-30       Impact factor: 3.239

3.  T-DNA integration into the Arabidopsis genome depends on sequences of pre-insertion sites.

Authors:  Véronique Brunaud; Sandrine Balzergue; Bertrand Dubreucq; Sébastien Aubourg; Franck Samson; Stéphanie Chauvin; Nicole Bechtold; Corinne Cruaud; Richard DeRose; Georges Pelletier; Loïc Lepiniec; Michel Caboche; Alain Lecharny
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 8.807

4.  Annotation of the Arabidopsis genome.

Authors:  Jennifer R Wortman; Brian J Haas; Linda I Hannick; Roger K Smith; Rama Maiti; Catherine M Ronning; Agnes P Chan; Chunhui Yu; Mulu Ayele; Catherine A Whitelaw; Owen R White; Christopher D Town
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Characterization and mapping of Ds-GUS-T-DNA lines for targeted insertional mutagenesis.

Authors:  D Smith; Y Yanai; Y G Liu; S Ishiguro; K Okada; D Shibata; R F Whittier; N V Fedoroff
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 6.  Target site selection in transposition.

Authors:  N L Craig
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 23.643

7.  Common physical properties of DNA affecting target site selection of sleeping beauty and other Tc1/mariner transposable elements.

Authors:  Thomas J Vigdal; Christopher D Kaufman; Zsuzsanna Izsvák; Daniel F Voytas; Zoltán Ivics
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-10-25       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  ATIDB: Arabidopsis thaliana insertion database.

Authors:  Xiaokang Pan; Hong Liu; Jonathan Clarke; Jonathan Jones; Mike Bevan; Lincoln Stein
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Characterization of the transposition pattern of the Ac element in Arabidopsis thaliana using endonuclease I-SceI.

Authors:  C Machida; H Onouchi; J Koizumi; S Hamada; E Semiarti; S Torikai; Y Machida
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-08-05       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  José M Alonso; Anna N Stepanova; Thomas J Leisse; Christopher J Kim; Huaming Chen; Paul Shinn; Denise K Stevenson; Justin Zimmerman; Pascual Barajas; Rosa Cheuk; Carmelita Gadrinab; Collen Heller; Albert Jeske; Eric Koesema; Cristina C Meyers; Holly Parker; Lance Prednis; Yasser Ansari; Nathan Choy; Hashim Deen; Michael Geralt; Nisha Hazari; Emily Hom; Meagan Karnes; Celene Mulholland; Ral Ndubaku; Ian Schmidt; Plinio Guzman; Laura Aguilar-Henonin; Markus Schmid; Detlef Weigel; David E Carter; Trudy Marchand; Eddy Risseeuw; Debra Brogden; Albana Zeko; William L Crosby; Charles C Berry; Joseph R Ecker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  16 in total

1.  The cyclic nucleotide-gated calmodulin-binding channel AtCNGC10 localizes to the plasma membrane and influences numerous growth responses and starch accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Tamás Borsics; David Webb; Christine Andeme-Ondzighi; L Andrew Staehelin; David A Christopher
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 4.116

2.  Many or most genes in Arabidopsis transposed after the origin of the order Brassicales.

Authors:  Michael Freeling; Eric Lyons; Brent Pedersen; Maqsudul Alam; Ray Ming; Damon Lisch
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Genome rearrangements in maize induced by alternative transposition of reversed ac/ds termini.

Authors:  Chuanhe Yu; Jianbo Zhang; Thomas Peterson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  SNP discovery and genetic mapping of T-DNA insertional mutants in Fragaria vesca L.

Authors:  J J Ruiz-Rojas; D J Sargent; V Shulaev; A W Dickerman; J Pattison; S H Holt; A Ciordia; Richard E Veilleux
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 5.  How important are transposons for plant evolution?

Authors:  Damon Lisch
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  A versatile gene trap to visualize and interrogate the function of the vertebrate proteome.

Authors:  Le A Trinh; Tatiana Hochgreb; Matthew Graham; David Wu; Frederique Ruf-Zamojski; Chathurani S Jayasena; Ankur Saxena; Rasheeda Hawk; Aidyl Gonzalez-Serricchio; Alana Dixson; Elly Chow; Constanza Gonzales; Ho-Yin Leung; Ilana Solomon; Marianne Bronner-Fraser; Sean G Megason; Scott E Fraser
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Transposition-based plant transformation.

Authors:  Hua Yan; Caius M Rommens
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Production of a high-efficiency TILLING population through polyploidization.

Authors:  Helen Tsai; Victor Missirian; Kathie J Ngo; Robert K Tran; Simon R Chan; Venkatesan Sundaresan; Luca Comai
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Gene trap lines define domains of gene regulation in Arabidopsis petals and stamens.

Authors:  Naomi Nakayama; Juana M Arroyo; Joseph Simorowski; Bruce May; Robert Martienssen; Vivian F Irish
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2005-07-29       Impact factor: 11.277

10.  Spectrum of T-DNA integrations for insertional mutagenesis of Histoplasma capsulatum.

Authors:  Megan M Kemski; Bryan Stevens; Chad A Rappleye
Journal:  Fungal Biol       Date:  2012-12-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.