Literature DB >> 15615831

Perceptual consequences of disrupted auditory nerve activity.

Fan-Gang Zeng1, Ying-Yee Kong, Henry J Michalewski, Arnold Starr.   

Abstract

Perceptual consequences of disrupted auditory nerve activity were systematically studied in 21 subjects who had been clinically diagnosed with auditory neuropathy (AN), a recently defined disorder characterized by normal outer hair cell function but disrupted auditory nerve function. Neurological and electrophysical evidence suggests that disrupted auditory nerve activity is due to desynchronized or reduced neural activity or both. Psychophysical measures showed that the disrupted neural activity has minimal effects on intensity-related perception, such as loudness discrimination, pitch discrimination at high frequencies, and sound localization using interaural level differences. In contrast, the disrupted neural activity significantly impairs timing related perception, such as pitch discrimination at low frequencies, temporal integration, gap detection, temporal modulation detection, backward and forward masking, signal detection in noise, binaural beats, and sound localization using interaural time differences. These perceptual consequences are the opposite of what is typically observed in cochlear-impaired subjects who have impaired intensity perception but relatively normal temporal processing after taking their impaired intensity perception into account. These differences in perceptual consequences between auditory neuropathy and cochlear damage suggest the use of different neural codes in auditory perception: a suboptimal spike count code for intensity processing, a synchronized spike code for temporal processing, and a duplex code for frequency processing. We also proposed two underlying physiological models based on desynchronized and reduced discharge in the auditory nerve to successfully account for the observed neurological and behavioral data. These methods and measures cannot differentiate between these two AN models, but future studies using electric stimulation of the auditory nerve via a cochlear implant might. These results not only show the unique contribution of neural synchrony to sensory perception but also provide guidance for translational research in terms of better diagnosis and management of human communication disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15615831     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00985.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  98 in total

Review 1.  Plasticity in the developing auditory cortex: evidence from children with sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Garrett Cardon; Julia Campbell; Anu Sharma
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  Impairments of the medial olivocochlear system increase the risk of noise-induced auditory neuropathy in laboratory mice.

Authors:  Bradford J May; Amanda M Lauer; Matthew J Roos
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 3.  Synchronous auditory nerve activity in the carboplatin-chinchilla model of auditory neuropathy.

Authors:  C D Cowper-Smith; R N Dingle; Y Guo; R Burkard; D P Phillips
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Amplitude modulation reduces loudness adaptation to high-frequency tones.

Authors:  Dwight P Wynne; Sahara E George; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Tinnitus Does Not Interfere with Auditory and Speech Perception.

Authors:  Fan-Gang Zeng; Matthew Richardson; Katie Turner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Age-related changes in the auditory brainstem response.

Authors:  Dawn Konrad-Martin; Marilyn F Dille; Garnett McMillan; Susan Griest; Daniel McDermott; Stephen A Fausti; Donald F Austin
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 7.  [Diagnosis and therapy of auditory synaptopathy/neuropathy].

Authors:  T Moser; N Strenzke; A Meyer; A Lesinski-Schiedat; T Lenarz; D Beutner; A Foerst; R Lang-Roth; H von Wedel; M Walger; M Gross; A Keilmann; A Limberger; T Steffens; J Strutz
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Psychophysical performance and Mandarin tone recognition in noise by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Chaogang Wei; Keli Cao; Xin Jin; Xiaowei Chen; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Quantifying envelope and fine-structure coding in auditory nerve responses to chimaeric speech.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-04-14

Review 10.  Cellular Computations Underlying Detection of Gaps in Sounds and Lateralizing Sound Sources.

Authors:  Donata Oertel; Xiao-Jie Cao; James R Ison; Paul D Allen
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 13.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.