Literature DB >> 19822731

Measuring and detecting molecular adaptation in codon usage against nonsense errors during protein translation.

Michael A Gilchrist1, Premal Shah, Russell Zaretzki.   

Abstract

Codon usage bias (CUB) has been documented across a wide range of taxa and is the subject of numerous studies. While most explanations of CUB invoke some type of natural selection, most measures of CUB adaptation are heuristically defined. In contrast, we present a novel and mechanistic method for defining and contextualizing CUB adaptation to reduce the cost of nonsense errors during protein translation. Using a model of protein translation, we develop a general approach for measuring the protein production cost in the face of nonsense errors of a given allele as well as the mean and variance of these costs across its coding synonyms. We then use these results to define the nonsense error adaptation index (NAI) of the allele or a contiguous subset thereof. Conceptually, the NAI value of an allele is a relative measure of its elevation on a specific and well-defined adaptive landscape. To illustrate its utility, we calculate NAI values for the entire coding sequence and across a set of nonoverlapping windows for each gene in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288c genome. Our results provide clear evidence of adaptation to reduce the cost of nonsense errors and increasing adaptation with codon position and expression. The magnitude and nature of this adaptation are also largely consistent with simulation results in which nonsense errors are the only selective force driving CUB evolution. Because NAI is derived from mechanistic models, it is both easier to interpret and more amenable to future refinement than other commonly used measures of codon bias. Further, our approach can also be used as a starting point for developing other mechanistically derived measures of adaptation such as for translational accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19822731      PMCID: PMC2787434          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.109.108209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  79 in total

1.  Gene expression analyzed by high-resolution state array analysis and quantitative proteomics: response of yeast to mating pheromone.

Authors:  Vivian L MacKay; Xiaohong Li; Mark R Flory; Eileen Turcott; G Lynn Law; Kyle A Serikawa; X L Xu; Hookeun Lee; David R Goodlett; Ruedi Aebersold; Lue Ping Zhao; David R Morris
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2004-02-06       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Ribosome recycling, diffusion, and mRNA loop formation in translational regulation.

Authors:  Tom Chou
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Intragenic spatial patterns of codon usage bias in prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Hong Qin; Wei Biao Wu; Josep M Comeron; Martin Kreitman; Wen-Hsiung Li
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Combining models of protein translation and population genetics to predict protein production rates from codon usage patterns.

Authors:  Michael A Gilchrist
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 5.  Translational selection and molecular evolution.

Authors:  H Akashi; A Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 5.578

6.  Compositional constraints and genome evolution.

Authors:  G Bernardi; G Bernardi
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  The codon Adaptation Index--a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications.

Authors:  P M Sharp; W H Li
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1987-02-11       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in protein genes. Differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and Escherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs.

Authors:  T Ikemura
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1982-07-15       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Tissue-specific codon usage and the expression of human genes.

Authors:  Joshua B Plotkin; Harlan Robins; Arnold J Levine
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-16       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Temporal patterns of fruit fly (Drosophila) evolution revealed by mutation clocks.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Sankar Subramanian; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 16.240

View more
  18 in total

1.  Explaining complex codon usage patterns with selection for translational efficiency, mutation bias, and genetic drift.

Authors:  Premal Shah; Michael A Gilchrist
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Interspecific and intragenic differences in codon usage bias among vertebrate myosin heavy-chain genes.

Authors:  Mikio C Aoi; Bryan C Rourke
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Quantifying shifts in natural selection on codon usage between protein regions: a population genetics approach.

Authors:  Alexander L Cope; Michael A Gilchrist
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.547

4.  Synonymous but Not Silent: The Codon Usage Code for Gene Expression and Protein Folding.

Authors:  Yi Liu; Qian Yang; Fangzhou Zhao
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 23.643

5.  CBDB: the codon bias database.

Authors:  Adam Hilterbrand; Joseph Saelens; Catherine Putonti
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  scnRCA: a novel method to detect consistent patterns of translational selection in mutationally-biased genomes.

Authors:  Patrick K O'Neill; Mindy Or; Ivan Erill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effect of correlated tRNA abundances on translation errors and evolution of codon usage bias.

Authors:  Premal Shah; Michael A Gilchrist
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 5.917

Review 8.  Determinants of translation efficiency and accuracy.

Authors:  Hila Gingold; Yitzhak Pilpel
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 11.429

9.  Codon usage in vertebrates is associated with a low risk of acquiring nonsense mutations.

Authors:  Pirmin Schmid; Willy A Flegel
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  Codon usage bias in prokaryotic pyrimidine-ending codons is associated with the degeneracy of the encoded amino acids.

Authors:  Naama Wald; Maya Alroy; Maya Botzman; Hanah Margalit
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-05-11       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.