Literature DB >> 15609031

Perceived duration of expected and unexpected stimuli.

Rolf Ulrich1, Judith Nitschke, Thomas Rammsayer.   

Abstract

Three experiments assessed whether perceived stimulus duration depends on whether participants process an expected or an unexpected visual stimulus. Participants compared the duration of a constant standard stimulus with a variable comparison stimulus. Changes in expectancy were induced by presenting one type of comparison more frequently than another type. Experiment 1 used standard durations of 100 and 400 ms, and Experiments 2 and 3 durations of 400 and 800 ms. Stimulus frequency did not affect perceived duration in Experiment 1. In Experiments 2 and 3, however, frequent comparisons were perceived as shorter than infrequent ones, and discrimination performance was better for infrequent comparisons. Overall, this study supports the notion that infrequent stimuli increase the speed of an internal pacemaker.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15609031     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-004-0195-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  41 in total

1.  Effects of auditory stimulus intensity on response force in simple, go/no-go, and choice RT tasks.

Authors:  J Miller; V Franz; R Ulrich
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-01

2.  Discriminating time intervals presented in sequences marked by visual signals.

Authors:  S Grondin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-10

3.  Effects of aging on absolute identification of duration.

Authors:  Teresa McCormack; Gordon D A Brown; Elizabeth A Maylor; Lucy B N Richardson; Richard J Darby
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2002-09

4.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

5.  Directed attention prolongs the perceived duration of a brief stimulus.

Authors:  S Mattes; R Ulrich
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1998-11

6.  Studies of auditory-visual differences in human time judgment. 1. Sounds are judged longer than lights.

Authors:  S Goldstone; W T Lhamon
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1974-08

7.  Duration discrimination of empty and filled intervals marked by auditory and visual signals.

Authors:  S Grondin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-09

8.  Sensory and cognitive components of visual information acquisition.

Authors:  T A Busey; G R Loftus
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Temporal generalization.

Authors:  R M Church; J Gibbon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1982-04

10.  Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval. Implications for a model of the "internal clock".

Authors:  M Treisman
Journal:  Psychol Monogr       Date:  1963
View more
  32 in total

1.  Using Time Perception to Measure Fitness for Duty.

Authors:  David M Eagleman
Journal:  Mil Psychol       Date:  2009-01-01

2.  Perceived duration is reduced by repetition but not by high-level expectation.

Authors:  Ming Bo Cai; David M Eagleman; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Does attention impair temporal discrimination? Examining non-attentional accounts.

Authors:  Bettina Rolke; Angela Dinkelbach; Elisabeth Hein; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-09-26

Review 4.  Is subjective duration a signature of coding efficiency?

Authors:  David M Eagleman; Vani Pariyadath
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Does the asymmetry effect inflate the temporal expansion of odd stimuli?

Authors:  Tanja Seifried; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-26

6.  Attentional entrainment and perceived event duration.

Authors:  J Devin McAuley; Elisa Kim Fromboluti
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  The expected oddball: effects of implicit and explicit positional expectation on duration perception.

Authors:  Jordan J Wehrman; John Wearden; Paul Sowman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-09-12

8.  An oscillating computational model can track pseudo-rhythmic speech by using linguistic predictions.

Authors:  Sanne Ten Oever; Andrea E Martin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Brief subjective durations contract with repetition.

Authors:  Vani Pariyadath; David M Eagleman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Free will debates: Simple experiments are not so simple.

Authors:  W R Klemm
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-08-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.