Literature DB >> 10070203

Effects of auditory stimulus intensity on response force in simple, go/no-go, and choice RT tasks.

J Miller1, V Franz, R Ulrich.   

Abstract

In four experiments, increasing the intensities of both relevant and irrelevant auditory stimuli was found to increase response force (RF) in simple, go/no-go, and choice reaction time (RT) tasks. These results raise problems for models that localize the effects of auditory intensity on purely perceptual processes, indicating instead that intensity also affects motor output processes under many circumstances. In Experiment 1, simple RT, go/no-go, and choice RT tasks were compared, using the same stimuli for all tasks. Auditory stimulus intensity affected both RT and RF, and these effects were not modulated by task. In Experiments 2-4, an irrelevant auditory accessory stimulus accompanied a relevant visual stimulus, and the go/no-go and choice tasks were used. The intensity of the irrelevant auditory accessory stimulus was found to affect RT and RF, although the sizes of these effects depended somewhat on the temporal predictability of the accessory stimulus.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10070203     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  14 in total

1.  At what stage of manual visual reaction time does interhemispheric transmission occur: controlled or ballistic?

Authors:  C Cavina-Pratesi; E Bricolo; B Pellegrini; C A Marzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-12       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Dissociations of spatial congruence effects across response measures: an examination of delta plots.

Authors:  Jeff Miller; Nora M Roüast
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-08-12

3.  Does the semantic activation of quantity representations influence motor parameters?

Authors:  Rico Fischer; Jeff Miller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Illusory double flashes can speed up responses like physical ones: evidence from the sound-induced flash illusion.

Authors:  Anja Fiedler; Julie L O'Sullivan; Hannes Schröter; Jeff Miller; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Accessory stimulus modulates executive function during stepping task.

Authors:  Tatsunori Watanabe; Soichiro Koyama; Shigeo Tanabe; Ippei Nojima
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Semantic incongruity influences response caution in audio-visual integration.

Authors:  Benjamin Steinweg; Fred W Mast
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Perceived duration of expected and unexpected stimuli.

Authors:  Rolf Ulrich; Judith Nitschke; Thomas Rammsayer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-12-18

8.  Response abilities of children with Down Syndrome and other intellectual developmental disorders.

Authors:  Pratiksha Tilak Rao; Vasudeva Guddattu; John Michael Solomon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Doing better than your best: loud auditory stimulation yields improvements in maximal voluntary force.

Authors:  Anam Anzak; Huiling Tan; Alek Pogosyan; Peter Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Interhemispheric interactions and redundancy gain: tests of an interhemispheric inhibition hypothesis.

Authors:  Jeff Miller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 2.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.