Literature DB >> 15603455

Effects of age and hearing loss on gap detection and the precedence effect: broadband stimuli.

Richard A Roberts1, Jennifer J Lister.   

Abstract

Older listeners with normal-hearing sensitivity and impaired-hearing sensitivity often demonstrate poorer-than-normal performance on tasks of speech understanding in noise and reverberation. Deficits in temporal resolution and in the precedence effect may underlie this difficulty. Temporal resolution is often studied by means of a gap-detection paradigm. This task is similar to binaural fusion paradigms used to measure the precedence effect. The purpose of this investigation was to determine if within-channel (measured with monotic and diotic gap detection) or across-channel (measured with dichotic gap detection) temporal resolution is related to fusion (measured with lag-burst thresholds; LBTs) under dichotic, anechoic, and reverberant conditions. Gap-detection thresholds (GDTs) and LBTs were measured by means of noise-burst stimuli for 3 groups of listeners: young adults with normal-hearing sensitivity (YNH), older adults with normal-hearing sensitivity (ONH), and older adults with impaired-hearing sensitivity (OIH). The GDTs indicated that across-channel temporal resolution is poorer than within-channel temporal resolution and that the effects of age and hearing loss are dependent on condition. Results for the fusion task indicated higher LBTs in reverberation than for the dichotic and anechoic conditions, regardless of group, and no effect of age or hearing loss for the nonreverberant conditions. However, higher LBTs were observed in the reverberant condition for the ONH listeners. Further, there was a correlation between across-channel temporal resolution and fusion in reverberation. Gap detection and fusion may not necessarily reflect the same underlying processes; however, across-channel gap detection may influence fusion under certain conditions (i.e., in reverberation).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15603455     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/071)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  15 in total

1.  Evidence for a neural source of the precedence effect in sound localization.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; Heath G Jones; Alan Kan; Tanvi Thakkar; G Christopher Stecker; Matthew J Goupell; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Cortical evoked response to gaps in noise: within-channel and across-channel conditions.

Authors:  Jennifer J Lister; Nathan D Maxfield; Gabriel J Pitt
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Influence of aging on human sound localization.

Authors:  Marina S Dobreva; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  The precedence effect in sound localization.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; G Christopher Stecker; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-06

5.  Temporal modulation transfer function for efficient assessment of auditory temporal resolution.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effect of hearing impairment on localization dominance for single-word stimuli.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd; Fiona H Guy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Chelsea Blankenship; Fawen Zhang; Robert Keith
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 8.  How aging impacts the encoding of binaural cues and the perception of auditory space.

Authors:  Ann Clock Eddins; Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 9.  Review article: review of the literature on temporal resolution in listeners with cochlear hearing impairment: a critical assessment of the role of suprathreshold deficits.

Authors:  Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Patrick M Zurek
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-12-11

10.  Age-related differences in gap detection: effects of task difficulty and cognitive ability.

Authors:  Kelly C Harris; Mark A Eckert; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.