Literature DB >> 15584808

More on the fragility of performance: choking under pressure in mathematical problem solving.

Sian L Beilock1, Catherine A Kulp, Lauren E Holt, Thomas H Carr.   

Abstract

In 3 experiments, the authors examined mathematical problem solving performance under pressure. In Experiment 1, pressure harmed performance on only unpracticed problems with heavy working memory demands. In Experiment 2, such high-demand problems were practiced until their answers were directly retrieved from memory. This eliminated choking under pressure. Experiment 3 dissociated practice on particular problems from practice on the solution algorithm by imposing a high-pressure test on problems practiced 1, 2, or 50 times each. Infrequently practiced high-demand problems were still performed poorly under pressure, whereas problems practiced 50 times each were not. These findings support distraction theories of choking in math, which contrasts with considerable evidence for explicit monitoring theories of choking in sensorimotor skills. This contrast suggests a skill taxonomy based on real-time control structures. (c) 2004 APA

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15584808     DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.584

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  42 in total

1.  Individual differences in simultaneous color constancy are related to working memory.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Allen; Sian L Beilock; Steven K Shevell
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.129

2.  Alone in the Crowd: I Failed the ABGC Certification Exam.

Authors:  Christine Colón
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Choking under pressure and working memory capacity: when performance pressure reduces fluid intelligence.

Authors:  David Gimmig; Pascal Huguet; Jean-Paul Caverni; François Cury
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

4.  The "Not Letting Go" phenomenon: accuracy instructions can impair behavioral and metacognitive effects of implicit learning processes.

Authors:  Andreas Hoyndorf; Hilde Haider
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-08

5.  Stereotype Fit Effects for Golf Putting Nonexperts.

Authors:  Lisa R Grimm; Benjamin Lewis; W Todd Maddox; Arthur B Markman
Journal:  Sport Exerc Perform Psychol       Date:  2015-10-05

6.  Brain Mechanisms of Social Threat Effects on Working Memory.

Authors:  V A van Ast; J Spicer; E E Smith; S Schmer-Galunder; I Liberzon; J L Abelson; T D Wager
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Item strength affects working memory capacity.

Authors:  Zhangfan Shen; Vencislav Popov; Anita B Delahay; Lynne M Reder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-02

8.  Reappraisal of incentives ameliorates choking under pressure and is correlated with changes in the neural representations of incentives.

Authors:  Simon Dunne; Vikram S Chib; Joseph Berleant; John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.436

9.  What is pressure? Evidence for social pressure as a type of regulatory focus.

Authors:  Darrell A Worthy; Arthur B Markman; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

10.  Teach It, Don't Preach It: The Differential Effects of Directly-communicated and Self-generated Utility Value Information.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Canning; Judith M Harackiewicz
Journal:  Motiv Sci       Date:  2015-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.