Literature DB >> 15577487

The current role of structural grafts and cages in revision arthroplasty of the hip.

Allan E Gross1, Stuart Goodman.   

Abstract

Treating large segmental acetabular defects that comprise more than 50% of the acetabulum is one of the most difficult challenges in revision arthroplasty of the hip. One of the surgical options is a structural acetabular allograft. Unless these allografts are protected by a cage that extends from ilium to ischium, there is an unacceptable incidence of graft failure. The cage allows reconstruction at the correct anatomic level. It provides a scaffold for bone grafting (structural and morsellized). The use of cement to stabilize the cup allows the surgeon to adjust the cup position independent of the cage. The current generation of cages does not provide biologic fixation and with time may loosen or fracture. Recent experience with a combination of a trabecular metal shell protected by a cage may offer a more favorable environment for bone grafting with permanent biologic fixation of the cup cage construct.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15577487     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000149822.49890.5e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  19 in total

1.  Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure.

Authors:  Jonathan N Sembrano; Edward Y Cheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A review of the treatment of pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  M Villanueva; A Rios-Luna; J Pereiro De Lamo; H Fahandez-Saddi; M P G Böstrom
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2008-07-15

3.  Late fracture of a Burch-Schneider acetabular cage: rare occurrence following polyethylene cup wear.

Authors:  Dario Regis; Andrea Sandri; Alessandra Rizzo; Pietro Bartolozzi
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2009-03-26

4.  Total hip arthroplasty in patients with Down's syndrome.

Authors:  Yona Kosashvili; Drew Taylor; David Backstein; Oleg Safir; Boaz Liberman; Dror Lakstein; Allan Gross
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Continued good results with modular trabecular metal augments for acetabular defects in hip arthroplasty at 7 to 11 years.

Authors:  Michael R Whitehouse; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  An alternative treatment option for Paprosky Type IIIb acetabular defect using multiple tantalum wedges - A case report.

Authors:  Markus Rossmann; Christian Ansorge; Christian Lausmann; Eduardo M Suero; Thorsten Gehrke; Mustafa Citak
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-10-25

7.  Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.

Authors:  Xavier Flecher; Benjamin Appy; Sébastien Parratte; Matthieu Ollivier; Jean-Noel Argenson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Modular tantalum augments for acetabular defects in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexander Siegmeth; Clive P Duncan; Bassam A Masri; Winston Y Kim; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-16       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Trabecular metal acetabular revision system (cup-cage construct) to address the massive acetabular defects in revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rajesh Malhotra; Ramprasad Kancherla; Vijay Kumar; Aditya Soral
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.251

10.  Use of porous trabecular metal augments with impaction bone grafting in management of acetabular bone loss.

Authors:  W Steven Borland; Raj Bhattacharya; James P Holland; Nigel T Brewster
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.