Literature DB >> 15576559

A novel method reveals that solvent water favors polyproline II over beta-strand conformation in peptides and unfolded proteins: conditional hydrophobic accessible surface area (CHASA).

Patrick J Fleming1, Nicholas C Fitzkee, Mihaly Mezei, Rajgopal Srinivasan, George D Rose.   

Abstract

In aqueous solution, the ensemble of conformations sampled by peptides and unfolded proteins is largely determined by their interaction with water. It has been a long-standing goal to capture these solute-water energetics accurately and efficiently in calculations. Historically, accessible surface area (ASA) has been used to estimate these energies, but this method breaks down when applied to amphipathic peptides and proteins. Here we introduce a novel method in which hydrophobic ASA is determined after first positioning water oxygens in hydrogen-bonded orientations proximate to all accessible peptide/protein backbone N and O atoms. This conditional hydrophobic accessible surface area is termed CHASA. The CHASA method was validated by predicting the polyproline-II (P(II)) and beta-strand conformational preferences of non-proline residues in the coil library (i.e., non-alpha-helix, non-beta-strand, non-beta-turn library derived from X-ray elucidated structures). Further, the method successfully rationalizes the previously unexplained solvation energies in polyalanyl peptides and compares favorably with published experimentally determined P(II) residue propensities. We dedicate this paper to Frederic M. Richards.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15576559      PMCID: PMC2253334          DOI: 10.1110/ps.041047005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  47 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  The penultimate rotamer library.

Authors:  S C Lovell; J M Word; J S Richardson; D C Richardson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-08-15

3.  Interaction between water and polar groups of the helix backbone: an important determinant of helix propensities.

Authors:  P Luo; R L Baldwin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-04-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Prediction of binding energetics from structure using empirical parameterization.

Authors:  B M Baker; K P Murphy
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.600

5.  The enthalpy change in protein folding and binding: refinement of parameters for structure-based calculations.

Authors:  V J Hilser; J Gómez; E Freire
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1996-10

6.  Free energy of burying hydrophobic residues in the interface between protein subunits.

Authors:  B Vallone; A E Miele; P Vecchini; E Chiancone; M Brunori
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The sensitivity of conformational free energies of the alanine dipeptide to atomic site charges.

Authors:  H Resat; P V Maye; M Mezei
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 2.505

8.  LINUS: a hierarchic procedure to predict the fold of a protein.

Authors:  R Srinivasan; G D Rose
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1995-06

9.  Intrinsic phi, psi propensities of amino acids, derived from the coil regions of known structures.

Authors:  M B Swindells; M W MacArthur; J M Thornton
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1995-07

10.  Solvation energies of amino acid side chains and backbone in a family of host-guest pentapeptides.

Authors:  W C Wimley; T P Creamer; S H White
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1996-04-23       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Do all backbone polar groups in proteins form hydrogen bonds?

Authors:  Patrick J Fleming; George D Rose
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2005-06-03       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Physical characterization of MxiH and PrgI, the needle component of the type III secretion apparatus from Shigella and Salmonella.

Authors:  Numukunda Darboe; Roma Kenjale; Wendy L Picking; William D Picking; C Russell Middaugh
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Secondary structure determines protein topology.

Authors:  Patrick J Fleming; Haipeng Gong; George D Rose
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Probabilistic approach to determining unbiased random-coil carbon-13 chemical shift values from the protein chemical shift database.

Authors:  Liya Wang; Hamid R Eghbalnia; John L Markley
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.835

Review 5.  Protein-solvent interactions.

Authors:  Ninad Prabhu; Kim Sharp
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 60.622

6.  Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters.

Authors:  Viktor Hornak; Robert Abel; Asim Okur; Bentley Strockbine; Adrian Roitberg; Carlos Simmerling
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-11-15

7.  Electrostatic effects in unfolded staphylococcal nuclease.

Authors:  Nicholas C Fitzkee; Bertrand García-Moreno E
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  UV Resonance Raman Structural Characterization of an (In)soluble Polyglutamine Peptide.

Authors:  Ryan S Jakubek; Stephen E White; Sanford A Asher
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 2.991

9.  Evolutionary conservation of the polyproline II conformation surrounding intrinsically disordered phosphorylation sites.

Authors:  W Austin Elam; Travis P Schrank; Andrew J Campagnolo; Vincent J Hilser
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Intrinsic structural disorder confers cellular viability on oncogenic fusion proteins.

Authors:  Hedi Hegyi; László Buday; Peter Tompa
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.