Literature DB >> 15564849

Cochlear implantation in patients with substantial residual hearing.

Robert D Cullen1, Carol Higgins, Emily Buss, Marcia Clark, Harold C Pillsbury, Craig A Buchman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Cochlear implantation is an effective means for providing auditory rehabilitation in adult patients with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss. It has been hypothesized that patients with substantial, preoperative residual hearing would be excellent cochlear implant candidates because of surviving neural populations and a lack of auditory deprivation. The purpose of this study is to describe the outcomes of patients with substantial residual hearing who have undergone cochlear implantation. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of patients with substantial preoperative residual hearing who underwent cochlear implantation.
METHODS: Chart reviews were completed for patients with substantial residual hearing who underwent cochlear implantation (City University of New York Sentence Test [CUNY] > 60%, Hearing in Noise Test sentences presented in quiet [HINTQ] > 50%, or Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant [CNC] > 20% in the ear to be implanted). Preoperative and postoperative measures of audiologic performance as well as complications were assessed.
RESULTS: All 12 patients who met inclusion criteria ultimately surpassed their preoperative aided performance level after implantation and gained significant benefit from their cochlear implant. At 6 months postimplantation, mean CUNY, HINTQ, and CNC scores were 93%, 78%, and 48% in the implant ear alone, respectively. However, progress was slower than expected for many patients, and at least one patient took 1 year to surpass his preoperative performance level. There were no complications from surgery in this selected group of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with some degree of residual hearing do benefit from cochlear implantation. However, there may be an initial decline in performance as compared with preoperative levels. This decline is overcome in time in this patient population. These patients need to be counseled accordingly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15564849     DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000149462.88327.7f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  17 in total

1.  Bilateral reorganization of posterior temporal cortices in post-lingual deafness and its relation to cochlear implant outcome.

Authors:  Diane S Lazard; Hyo-Jeong Lee; Eric Truy; Anne-Lise Giraud
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  [Acoustic-mechanical trauma during cochleostomy: animal experimental studies].

Authors:  C Punke; T Zehlicke; U Sievert; H W Pau
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Auditory nerve fiber responses to combined acoustic and electric stimulation.

Authors:  Charles A Miller; Paul J Abbas; Barbara K Robinson; Kirill V Nourski; Fawen Zhang; Fuh-Cherng Jeng
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-02-10

4.  Electrophysiological properties of cochlear implantation in the gerbil using a flexible array.

Authors:  Christine DeMason; Baishakhi Choudhury; Faisal Ahmad; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Jacob Wang; Craig A Buchman; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Detection of intracochlear damage with cochlear implantation in a gerbil model of hearing loss.

Authors:  Baishakhi Choudhury; Oliver Franz Adunka; Christine E Demason; Faisal I Ahmad; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Evaluation of a revised indication for determining adult cochlear implant candidacy.

Authors:  Douglas P Sladen; René H Gifford; David Haynes; David Kelsall; Aaron Benson; Kristen Lewis; Teresa Zwolan; Qian-Jie Fu; Bruce Gantz; Jan Gilden; Brian Westerberg; Cindy Gustin; Lori O'Neil; Colin L Driscoll
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  [Present state of cochlear implant treatment in adults and children].

Authors:  J Maurer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Intra-operative monitoring of cochlear function during cochlear implantation.

Authors:  John S Oghalai; Ross Tonini; Jamie Rasmus; Claudia Emery; Spiros Manolidis; Jeffrey T Vrabec; Joann Haymond
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2009-03

9.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of hearing-impaired children under sedation before cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ankur M Patel; Lisa D Cahill; Jennifer Ret; Vincent Schmithorst; Daniel Choo; Scott Holland
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-07

Review 10.  [Fully implantable hearing systems].

Authors:  J Maurer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.284

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.