OBJECTIVE: To investigate functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in pediatric cochlear implantation candidates with residual hearing who are under sedation for evaluation of auditory function. DESIGN: During fMRI, subjects heard a random sequence of tones (250-4000 Hz) presented 10 dB above hearing thresholds. Tones were interleaved with silence in a block-periodic fMRI design with 30-second on-off intervals. Twenty-four axial sections (5 mm thick) covering most of the brain were obtained every 3 seconds for a total acquisition time of 5.5 minutes. SETTING: Single tertiary academic medical institution. PATIENTS: Severely to profoundly hearing-impaired children (n=10; mean age, 49.1 months). During fMRI, subjects were awake (n=2) or sedated with pentobarbital sodium if their weight was 10 kg or greater (n=4) or chloral hydrate if their weight was less than 10 kg (n=4). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Detection of brain activation by fMRI in the primary auditory cortex (A1) in hearing-impaired patients under sedation, and correlation of A1 activation with hearing levels measured after cochlear implantation. RESULTS: In most subjects, fMRI detected significant levels of activation in the A1 region before cochlear implantation. The improvement in hearing threshold after cochlear implantation correlated strongly (linear regression coefficient, R=0.88) with the amount of activation in the A1 region detected by fMRI before cochlear implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Functional MRI can be considered a means of assessing residual function in the A1 region in sedated hearing-impaired toddlers. With improvements in acquisition, processing, and sedation methods, fMRI may be translated into a prognostic indicator for outcome after cochlear implantation in infants.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in pediatric cochlear implantation candidates with residual hearing who are under sedation for evaluation of auditory function. DESIGN: During fMRI, subjects heard a random sequence of tones (250-4000 Hz) presented 10 dB above hearing thresholds. Tones were interleaved with silence in a block-periodic fMRI design with 30-second on-off intervals. Twenty-four axial sections (5 mm thick) covering most of the brain were obtained every 3 seconds for a total acquisition time of 5.5 minutes. SETTING: Single tertiary academic medical institution. PATIENTS: Severely to profoundly hearing-impairedchildren (n=10; mean age, 49.1 months). During fMRI, subjects were awake (n=2) or sedated with pentobarbital sodium if their weight was 10 kg or greater (n=4) or chloral hydrate if their weight was less than 10 kg (n=4). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Detection of brain activation by fMRI in the primary auditory cortex (A1) in hearing-impairedpatients under sedation, and correlation of A1 activation with hearing levels measured after cochlear implantation. RESULTS: In most subjects, fMRI detected significant levels of activation in the A1 region before cochlear implantation. The improvement in hearing threshold after cochlear implantation correlated strongly (linear regression coefficient, R=0.88) with the amount of activation in the A1 region detected by fMRI before cochlear implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Functional MRI can be considered a means of assessing residual function in the A1 region in sedated hearing-impaired toddlers. With improvements in acquisition, processing, and sedation methods, fMRI may be translated into a prognostic indicator for outcome after cochlear implantation in infants.
Authors: Laurie S Eisenberg; Karen Iler Kirk; Amy Schaefer Martinez; Elizabeth A Ying; Richard T Miyamoto Journal: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2004-05
Authors: Alexander B G Sevy; Heather Bortfeld; Theodore J Huppert; Michael S Beauchamp; Ross E Tonini; John S Oghalai Journal: Hear Res Date: 2010-10-01 Impact factor: 3.208
Authors: Mark W DiFrancesco; Sara A Robertson; Prasanna Karunanayaka; Scott K Holland Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Jennifer Vannest; Prasanna R Karunanayaka; Vincent J Schmithorst; Jerzy P Szaflarski; Scott K Holland Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Elveda Gozdas; Nehal A Parikh; Stephanie L Merhar; Jean A Tkach; Lili He; Scott K Holland Journal: Brain Struct Funct Date: 2018-07-10 Impact factor: 3.270
Authors: Jennifer J Vannest; Prasanna R Karunanayaka; Mekibib Altaye; Vincent J Schmithorst; Elena M Plante; Kenneth J Eaton; Jerod M Rasmussen; Scott K Holland Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 4.813