Literature DB >> 11032091

Pharmacometrics: modelling and simulation tools to improve decision making in clinical drug development.

R Gieschke1, J L Steimer.   

Abstract

There is broad recognition within the pharmaceutical industry that the drug development process, especially the clinical part of it, needs considerable improvement to cope with rapid changes in research and health care environments. Modelling and simulation are mathematically founded techniques that have been used extensively and for a long time in other areas than the pharmaceutical industry (e.g. automobile, aerospace) to design and develop products more efficiently. Both modelling and simulation rely on the use of (mathematical and statistical) models which are essentially simplified descriptions of complex systems under investigation. It has been proposed to integrate pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) principles into drug development to make it more rational and efficient. There is evidence from a survey on 18 development projects that a PK/PD guided approach can contribute to streamline the drug development process. This approach extensively relies on PK/PD models describing the relationships among dose, concentration (and more generally exposure), and responses such as surrogate markers, efficacy measures, adverse events. Well documented empirical and physiologically based PK/PD models are becoming available more and more, and there are ongoing efforts to integrate models for disease progression and patient behavior (e.g. compliance) as well. Other types of models which are becoming increasingly important are population PK/PD models which, in addition to the characterization of PK and PD, involve relationships between covariates (i.e. patient characteristics such as age, body weight) and PK/PD parameters. Population models allow to assess and to quantify potential sources of variability in exposure and response in the target population, even under sparse sampling conditions. As will be shown for an anticancer agent, implications of significant covariate effects can be evaluated by computer simulations using the population PK/PD model. Stochastic simulation is widely used as a tool for evaluation of statistical methodology including for example the evaluation of performance of measures for bioequivalence assessment. Recently, it was suggested to expand the use of simulations in support of clinical drug development for predicting outcomes of planned trials. The methodological basis for this approach is provided by (population) PK/PD models together with random sampling techniques. Models for disease progression and behavioral features like compliance, drop-out rates, adverse event dependent dose reductions, etc. have to be added to population PK/PD models in order to mimic the real situation. It will be shown that computer simulation helps to evaluate consequences of design features on safety and efficacy assessment of the drug, enabling identification of statistically valid and practically realisable study designs. For both modelling and simulation a guidance on 'best practices' is currently worked out by a panel of experts comprising representatives from academia, regulatory bodies and industry, thereby providing a necessary condition that model-based analysis and simulation will further contribute to streamlining pharmaceutical drug development processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11032091     DOI: 10.1007/BF03190058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0378-7966            Impact factor:   2.441


  10 in total

1.  Relationships between exposure to saquinavir monotherapy and antiviral response in HIV-positive patients.

Authors:  R Gieschke; B Fotteler; N Buss; J L Steimer
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Exploring clinical study design by computer simulation based on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling.

Authors:  R Gieschke; B G Reigner; J L Steimer
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.366

Review 3.  The use of population pharmacokinetics in drug development.

Authors:  S Vozeh; J L Steimer; M Rowland; P Morselli; F Mentre; L P Balant; L Aarons
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  An evaluation of the integration of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles in clinical drug development. Experience within Hoffmann La Roche.

Authors:  B G Reigner; P E Williams; I H Patel; J L Steimer; C Peck; P van Brummelen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Fourth-generation model for corticosteroid pharmacodynamics: a model for methylprednisolone effects on receptor/gene-mediated glucocorticoid receptor down-regulation and tyrosine aminotransferase induction in rat liver.

Authors:  Y N Sun; D C DuBois; R R Almon; W J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1998-06

6.  Comparison of four basic models of indirect pharmacodynamic responses.

Authors:  N L Dayneka; V Garg; W J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1993-08

Review 7.  Understanding the dose-effect relationship: clinical application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models.

Authors:  N H Holford; L B Sheiner
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1981 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Role of population pharmacokinetics in drug development. A pharmaceutical industry perspective.

Authors:  E Samara; R Granneman
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: application to d-tubocurarine.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; D R Stanski; S Vozeh; R D Miller; J Ham
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Mathematical biology of HIV infections: antigenic variation and diversity threshold.

Authors:  M A Nowak; R M May
Journal:  Math Biosci       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 2.144

  10 in total
  26 in total

Review 1.  Economic evaluations during early (phase II) drug development: a role for clinical trial simulations?

Authors:  D A Hughes; T Walley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Whole body pharmacokinetic models.

Authors:  Ivan Nestorov
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Biomarkers, validation and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling.

Authors:  Wayne A Colburn; Jean W Lee
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Role of modelling and simulation: a European regulatory perspective.

Authors:  Siv Jönsson; Anja Henningsson; Monica Edholm; Tomas Salmonson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 5.  Integrated pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in drug development.

Authors:  Jasper Dingemanse; Silke Appel-Dingemanse
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Informative study designs to identify true parameter-covariate relationships.

Authors:  Phey Yen Han; Carl M J Kirkpatrick; Bruce Green
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 2.745

7.  A survey of the way pharmacokinetics are reported in published phase I clinical trials, with an emphasis on oncology.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Comets; Sarah Zohar
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Refinement of the population pharmacokinetic model for the monoclonal antibody matuzumab: external model evaluation and simulations.

Authors:  Katharina Kuester; Andreas Kovar; Christian Lüpfert; Brigitte Brockhaus; Charlotte Kloft
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

9.  Structural models describing placebo treatment effects in schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Venkatesh Pilla Reddy; Magdalena Kozielska; Martin Johnson; An Vermeulen; Rik de Greef; Jing Liu; Geny M M Groothuis; Meindert Danhof; Johannes H Proost
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.447

10.  Modeling dose-response relationships of the effects of fesoterodine in patients with overactive bladder.

Authors:  Linda Cardozo; Vik Khullar; Ahmed El-Tahtawy; Zhonghong Guan; Bimal Malhotra; David Staskin
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.