Literature DB >> 17051439

Modelling response time profiles in the absence of drug concentrations: definition and performance evaluation of the K-PD model.

P Jacqmin1, E Snoeck, E A van Schaick, R Gieschke, P Pillai, J-L Steimer, P Girard.   

Abstract

The plasma concentration-time profile of a drug is essential to explain the relationship between the administered dose and the kinetics of drug action. However, in some cases such as in pre-clinical pharmacology or phase-III clinical studies where it is not always possible to collect all the required PK information, this relationship can be difficult to establish. In these circumstances several authors have proposed simple models that can analyse and simulate the kinetics of the drug action in the absence of PK data. The present work further develops and evaluates the performance of such an approach. A virtual compartment representing the biophase in which the concentration is in equilibrium with the observed effect is used to extract the (pharmaco)kinetic component from the pharmacodynamic data alone. Parameters of this model are the elimination rate constant from the virtual compartment (KDE), which describes the equilibrium between the rate of dose administration and the observed effect, and the second parameter, named EDK(50) which is the apparent in vivo potency of the drug at steady state, analogous to the product of EC(50), the pharmacodynamic potency, and clearance, the PK "potency" at steady state. Using population simulation and subsequent (blinded) analysis to evaluate this approach, it is demonstrated that the proposed model usually performs well and can be used for predictive simulations in drug development. However, there are several important limitations to this approach. For example, the investigated doses should extend from those producing responses well below the EC(50) to those producing ones close to the maximum response, optimally reach steady state response and followed until the response returns to baseline. It is shown that large inter-individual variability on PK-PD parameters will produce biases as well as large imprecision on parameter estimates. It is also clear that extrapolations to dosage routes or schedules other than those used to estimate the parameters should be undertaken with great caution (e.g., in case of non-linearity or complex drug distribution). Consequently, it is advised to apply this approach only when the underlying structural PD and PK are well understood. In any case, K-PD model should definitively not be substituted for the gold standard PK-PD model when correct full model can and should be identified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17051439     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-006-9035-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  23 in total

1.  A pharmacokinetic simulation model for ivabradine in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  S B Duffull; S Chabaud; P Nony; C Laveille; P Girard; L Aarons
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  Explicit solutions for a class of indirect pharmacodynamic response models.

Authors:  P Jordan; R Gieschke
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Are plasma concentration values necessary for pharmacodynamic modeling of muscle relaxants?

Authors:  D M Fisher; P M Wright
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Contribution of midazolam and its 1-hydroxy metabolite to preoperative sedation in children: a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis.

Authors:  T N Johnson; A Rostami-Hodjegan; J M Goddard; M S Tanner; G T Tucker
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  Kinetics of pharmacologic activity of succinylcholine in man.

Authors:  G Levy
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1967-12       Impact factor: 3.534

6.  Effect of misspecification of the absorption process on subsequent parameter estimation in population analysis.

Authors:  J R Wade; A W Kelman; C A Howie; B Whiting
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1993-04

7.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of the anti-lipolytic and anti-ketotic effects of the adenosine A1-receptor agonist N6-(p-sulphophenyl)adenosine in rats.

Authors:  E A van Schaick; H J de Greef; M W Langemeijer; M J Sheehan; A P IJzerman; M Danhof
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 8.739

8.  A semimechanistic and mechanistic population PK-PD model for biomarker response to ibandronate, a new bisphosphonate for the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Goonaseelan Pillai; Ronald Gieschke; Timothy Goggin; Philippe Jacqmin; Ralph C Schimmer; Jean-Louis Steimer
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: application to d-tubocurarine.

Authors:  L B Sheiner; D R Stanski; S Vozeh; R D Miller; J Ham
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  Mixed-effects modeling of the pharmacodynamic response to the calcimimetic agent R-568.

Authors:  R L Lalonde; J Gaudreault; D A Karhu; T B Marriott
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.875

View more
  61 in total

Review 1.  Bringing Model-Based Prediction to Oncology Clinical Practice: A Review of Pharmacometrics Principles and Applications.

Authors:  Núria Buil-Bruna; José-María López-Picazo; Salvador Martín-Algarra; Iñaki F Trocóniz
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-12-14

2.  A Joint Model for Vitamin K-Dependent Clotting Factors and Anticoagulation Proteins.

Authors:  Qing Xi Ooi; Daniel F B Wright; R Campbell Tait; Geoffrey K Isbister; Stephen B Duffull
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Semi-mechanistic model for neutropenia after high dose of chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Amelia Ramon-Lopez; Ricardo Nalda-Molina; Belen Valenzuela; Juan Jose Perez-Ruixo
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 4.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling in anaesthesia.

Authors:  Pedro L Gambús; Iñaki F Trocóniz
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  Proposals for model-based paediatric medicinal development within the current European Union regulatory framework.

Authors:  Efthymios Manolis; Gérard Pons
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 6.  Understanding the time course of pharmacological effect: a PKPD approach.

Authors:  Daniel F B Wright; Helen R Winter; Stephen B Duffull
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  A semi-mechanistic model of bone mineral density and bone turnover based on a circular model of bone remodeling.

Authors:  Erno van Schaick; Jenny Zheng; Juan Jose Perez Ruixo; Ronald Gieschke; Philippe Jacqmin
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.745

8.  Assessing the impact of the addition of dendritic cell vaccination to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients: A model-based characterization approach.

Authors:  Belén P Solans; Ascensión López-Díaz de Cerio; Arlette Elizalde; Luis Javier Pina; Susana Inogés; Jaime Espinós; Esteban Salgado; Luis Daniel Mejías; Iñaki F Trocóniz; Marta Santisteban
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  Modelling the dose-response relationship: the fair share of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information.

Authors:  Mario González-Sales; Fahima Nekka; Mario Tanguay; Pierre-Olivier Tremblay; Jun Li
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  A Prediction Model of Tumor Progression and Survival in HER2-Positive Metastatic Gastric Cancer Patients Treated with Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Dongwoo Chae; Chung Mo Nam; Joo Hoon Kim; Choong-Kun Lee; Seung-Seob Kim; Hyo Song Kim; Minkyu Jung; Jae Ho Cheong; Hyun Cheol Chung; Sun Young Rha; Kyungsoo Park
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.