Literature DB >> 10594008

A double-strand break in a chromosomal LINE element can be repaired by gene conversion with various endogenous LINE elements in mouse cells.

A Tremblay1, M Jasin, P Chartrand.   

Abstract

A double-strand break (DSB) in the mammalian genome has been shown to be a very potent signal for the cell to activate repair processes. Two different types of repair have been identified in mammalian cells. Broken ends can be rejoined with or without loss or addition of DNA or, alternatively, a homologous template can be used to repair the break. For most genomic sequences the latter event would involve allelic sequences present on the sister chromatid or homologous chromosome. However, since more than 30% of our genome consists of repetitive sequences, these would have the option of using nonallelic sequences for homologous repair. This could have an impact on the evolution of these sequences and of the genome itself. We have designed an assay to look at the repair of DSBs in LINE-1 (L1) elements which number 10(5) copies distributed throughout the genome of all mammals. We introduced into the genome of mouse epithelial cells an L1 element with an I-SceI endonuclease site. We induced DSBs at the I-SceI site and determined their mechanism of repair. We found that in over 95% of cases, the DSBs were repaired by an end-joining process. However, in almost 1% of cases, we found strong evidence for repair involving gene conversion with various endogenous L1 elements, with some being used preferentially. In particular, the T(F) family and the L1Md-A2 subfamily, which are the most active in retrotransposition, appeared to be contributing the most in this process. The degree of homology did not seem to be a determining factor in the selection of the endogenous elements used for repair but may be based instead on accessibility. Considering their abundance and dispersion, gene conversion between repetitive elements may be occurring frequently enough to be playing a role in their evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10594008      PMCID: PMC85044          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.20.1.54-60.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  45 in total

1.  Sensitivity and selectivity of the DNA damage sensor responsible for activating p53-dependent G1 arrest.

Authors:  L C Huang; K C Clarkin; G M Wahl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Chromosomal double-strand break repair in Ku80-deficient cells.

Authors:  F Liang; P J Romanienko; D T Weaver; P A Jeggo; M Jasin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-08-20       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Genetic manipulation of genomes with rare-cutting endonucleases.

Authors:  M Jasin
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Nonhomologous recombination in mammalian cells: role for short sequence homologies in the joining reaction.

Authors:  D B Roth; J H Wilson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  The sequence of a large L1Md element reveals a tandemly repeated 5' end and several features found in retrotransposons.

Authors:  D D Loeb; R W Padgett; S C Hardies; W R Shehee; M B Comer; M H Edgell; C A Hutchison
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Stimulation of intrachromosomal homologous recombination in human cells by electroporation with site-specific endonucleases.

Authors:  M Brenneman; F S Gimble; J H Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Organization and evolutionary progress of a dispersed repetitive family of sequences in widely separated rodent genomes.

Authors:  S D Brown; G Dover
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1981-08-25       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  The L1Md long interspersed repeat family in the mouse: almost all examples are truncated at one end.

Authors:  C F Voliva; C L Jahn; M B Comer; C A Hutchison; M H Edgell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1983-12-20       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors.

Authors:  F Sanger; S Nicklen; A R Coulson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  LINE-1 elements at the sites of molecular rearrangements in Alport syndrome-diffuse leiomyomatosis.

Authors:  Y Segal; B Peissel; A Renieri; M de Marchi; A Ballabio; Y Pei; J Zhou
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  18 in total

1.  Capture of DNA sequences at double-strand breaks in mammalian chromosomes.

Authors:  Y Lin; A S Waldman
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A chromosomal position effect on gene targeting in human cells.

Authors:  Rafael J Yáñez; Andrew C G Porter
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Preferential accessibility to specific genomic loci for the repair of double-strand breaks in human cells.

Authors:  Hélène D'Anjou; Catherine Chabot; Pierre Chartrand
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Dynamic structure of the SPANX gene cluster mapped to the prostate cancer susceptibility locus HPCX at Xq27.

Authors:  Natalay Kouprina; Adam Pavlicek; Vladimir N Noskov; Greg Solomon; John Otstot; William Isaacs; John D Carpten; Jeffrey M Trent; Joanna Schleutker; J Carl Barrett; Jerzy Jurka; Vladimir Larionov
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  Playing in the mud-using gene expression to assess contaminant effects on sediment dwelling invertebrates.

Authors:  Edward J Perkins; Guilherme R Lotufo
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.823

6.  Transcription of a donor enhances its use during double-strand break-induced gene conversion in human cells.

Authors:  Ezra Schildkraut; Cheryl A Miller; Jac A Nickoloff
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Competitive repair by naturally dispersed repetitive DNA during non-allelic homologous recombination.

Authors:  Margaret L Hoang; Frederick J Tan; David C Lai; Sue E Celniker; Roger A Hoskins; Maitreya J Dunham; Yixian Zheng; Douglas Koshland
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Loss of epigenetic silencing in tumors preferentially affects primate-specific retroelements.

Authors:  Sebastian Szpakowski; Xueguang Sun; José M Lage; Andrew Dyer; Jill Rubinstein; Diane Kowalski; Clarence Sasaki; Jose Costa; Paul M Lizardi
Journal:  Gene       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 3.688

9.  A comprehensive analysis of recently integrated human Ta L1 elements.

Authors:  Jeremy S Myers; Bethaney J Vincent; Hunt Udall; W Scott Watkins; Tammy A Morrish; Gail E Kilroy; Gary D Swergold; Jurgen Henke; Lotte Henke; John V Moran; Lynn B Jorde; Mark A Batzer
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Computational and biological inference of gene regulatory networks of the LINE-1 retrotransposon.

Authors:  Kenneth S Ramos; Qiang He; Ted Kalbfleisch; Diego E Montoya-Durango; Ivo Teneng; Vilius Stribinskis; Marcel Brun
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.736

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.