Literature DB >> 19228989

Mechanical efficiency of limb swing during walking and running in guinea fowl (Numida meleagris).

Jonas Rubenson1, Richard L Marsh.   

Abstract

Understanding the mechanical determinants of the energy cost of limb swing is crucial for refining our models of locomotor energetics, as well as improving treatments for those suffering from impaired limb-swing mechanics. In this study, we use guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) as a model to explore whether mechanical work at the joints explains limb-swing energy use by combining inverse dynamic modeling and muscle-specific energetics from blood flow measurements. We found that the overall efficiencies of the limb swing increased markedly from walking (3%) to fast running (17%) and are well below the usually accepted maximum efficiency of muscle, except at the fastest speeds recorded. The estimated efficiency of a single muscle used during ankle flexion (tibialis cranialis) parallels that of the total limb-swing efficiency (3% walking, 15% fast running). Taken together, these findings do not support the hypothesis that joint work is the major determinant of limb-swing energy use across the animal's speed range and warn against making simple predictions of energy use based on joint mechanical work. To understand limb-swing energy use, mechanical functions other than accelerating the limb segments need to be explored, including isometric force production and muscle work arising from active and passive antagonist muscle forces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19228989      PMCID: PMC2681329          DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.91115.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  58 in total

Review 1.  Muscular force or work: what determines the metabolic energy cost of running?

Authors:  R Kram
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.230

2.  Estimating mechanical cost in subjects with myelomeningocele.

Authors:  Brona McDowell; Aidan Cosgrove; Richard Baker
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.840

3.  In situ rat fast skeletal muscle is more efficient at submaximal than at maximal activation levels.

Authors:  F Abbate; C J De Ruiter; C Offringa; A J Sargeant; A De Haan
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-05

4.  Energy cost and muscular activity required for propulsion during walking.

Authors:  Jinger S Gottschall; Rodger Kram
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-12-27

5.  Biomechanics: A catapult action for rapid limb protraction.

Authors:  Alan M Wilson; Johanna C Watson; Glen A Lichtwark
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-01-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Muscle activation strategies at the knee during running and cutting maneuvers.

Authors:  Thor F Besier; David G Lloyd; Timothy R Ackland
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Swing phase mechanics of healthy young and elderly men.

Authors:  P M Mills; R S Barrett
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 8.  The energy expenditure of normal and pathologic gait.

Authors:  R L Waters; S Mulroy
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  Muscle oxygen uptake and energy turnover during dynamic exercise at different contraction frequencies in humans.

Authors:  R A Ferguson; D Ball; P Krustrup; P Aagaard; M Kjaer; A J Sargeant; Y Hellsten; J Bangsbo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Energetics of bipedal running. II. Limb design and running mechanics.

Authors:  T J Roberts; M S Chen; C R Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  15 in total

1.  Mechanisms producing coordinated function across the breadth of a large biarticular thigh muscle.

Authors:  Jennifer A Carr; David J Ellerby; Jonas Rubenson; Richard L Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Stance and swing phase costs in human walking.

Authors:  Brian R Umberger
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  The mechanical function of linked muscles in the guinea fowl hind limb.

Authors:  David J Ellerby; Richard L Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Adaptations for economical bipedal running: the effect of limb structure on three-dimensional joint mechanics.

Authors:  Jonas Rubenson; David G Lloyd; Denham B Heliams; Thor F Besier; Paul A Fournier
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  American Society of Biomechanics Journal of Biomechanics Award 2017: High-acceleration training during growth increases optimal muscle fascicle lengths in an avian bipedal model.

Authors:  M Q Salzano; S M Cox; S J Piazza; J Rubenson
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Eliminating high-intensity activity during growth reduces mechanical power capacity but not submaximal metabolic cost in a bipedal animal model.

Authors:  Suzanne Michelle Cox; Matthew Q Salzano; Stephen J Piazza; Jonas Rubenson
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2019-11-21

7.  Humans, geometric similarity and the Froude number: is ''reasonably close'' really close enough?

Authors:  Patricia Ann Kramer; Adam D Sylvester
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 2.422

8.  Gearing effects of the patella (knee extensor muscle sesamoid) of the helmeted guineafowl during terrestrial locomotion.

Authors:  V R Allen; R E Kambic; S M Gatesy; J R Hutchinson
Journal:  J Zool (1987)       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.322

9.  Resolving shifting patterns of muscle energy use in swimming fish.

Authors:  Shannon P Gerry; David J Ellerby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Anatomical and biomechanical traits of broiler chickens across ontogeny. Part II. Body segment inertial properties and muscle architecture of the pelvic limb.

Authors:  Heather Paxton; Peter G Tickle; Jeffery W Rankin; Jonathan R Codd; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.