Literature DB >> 15557362

Influence of health insurance status on inclusion of HER-2/neu testing in the diagnostic workup of breast cancer patients.

Azadeh Stark1, Gena Kucera, Mei Lu, Sarah Claud, Jennifer Griggs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: . To assess the prevalence of HER-2/neu testing in a community-based health care system shortly after the approval of several laboratory kits for HER-2/neu testing for diagnostic purposes by the US Food and Drug Administration and to discern the best discriminating variables for inclusion of the test in the diagnostic workup of breast cancer patients.
DESIGN: A retrospective cross-sectional study was designed to analyze data for the period beginning 1 January 1999 and ending 31 December 2000.
SETTING: Henry Ford Health System, the largest health care system in southeastern Michigan, is a comprehensive, self-contained system. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred and fifty-one women diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancers were consecutively sampled from the tumor registry of the Henry Ford Health System.
RESULTS: The proportion of women tested for HER-2/neu increased by 2-fold during year 2 of the observation. Absence of estrogen receptors (OR = 1.96, 95% CI 1.15-3.21), physicians with specialty in surgery (OR = 6.21, 95% CI 2.88-13.33, P = 0.0001), and having a capitated insurance (OR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.06-2.44, P = 0.027) were associated with HER-2/neu testing.
CONCLUSION: Absence of estrogen receptors was the only pathological characteristic associated with HER-2/neu testing. The effect of specialization in surgery on the increased likelihood of HER-2/neu testing can be explained mostly by the 'patient volume effect'. The observed disparity in the delivery of innovative diagnostic approaches to cancer patients was influenced by the type of health insurance. Implementation of institutional policies can improve in providing universal quality of care for all patients regardless of their health insurance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15557362     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  10 in total

1.  Closing the evidence gap in the use of emerging testing technologies in clinical practice.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Challenges to the translation of genomic information into clinical practice and health policy: Utilization, preferences and economic value.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Su-Ying Liang; Stephanie Van Bebber
Journal:  Curr Opin Mol Ther       Date:  2008-06

3.  Genomic testing and therapies for breast cancer in clinical practice.

Authors:  Jennifer S Haas; Kathryn A Phillips; Su-Ying Liang; Michael J Hassett; Carol Keohane; Elena B Elkin; Joanne Armstrong; Michele Toscano
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

Review 4.  Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Women With Early-Stage Invasive Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Lyndsay N Harris; Nofisat Ismaila; Lisa M McShane; Fabrice Andre; Deborah E Collyar; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Elizabeth H Hammond; Nicole M Kuderer; Minetta C Liu; Robert G Mennel; Catherine Van Poznak; Robert C Bast; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  HER2 evaluation and its impact on breast cancer treatment decisions.

Authors:  K A B Goddard; S Weinmann; K Richert-Boe; C Chen; J Bulkley; C Wax
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 2.000

6.  Use of Biomarkers to Guide Decisions on Systemic Therapy for Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Catherine Van Poznak; Mark R Somerfield; Robert C Bast; Massimo Cristofanilli; Matthew P Goetz; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; David G Hicks; Elizabeth G Hill; Minetta C Liu; Wanda Lucas; Ingrid A Mayer; Robert G Mennel; William F Symmans; Daniel F Hayes; Lyndsay N Harris
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  First do no harm: population-based study shows non-evidence-based trastuzumab prescription may harm elderly women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Ya-Chen Tina Shih; Ying Xu; Wenli Dong; Fabrice Smieliauskas; Sharon Giordano; Yu Shen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Clinical practice patterns and cost effectiveness of human epidermal growth receptor 2 testing strategies in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Kathryn A Phillips; Deborah A Marshall; Jennifer S Haas; Elena B Elkin; Su-Ying Liang; Michael J Hassett; Ilia Ferrusi; Jane E Brock; Stephanie L Van Bebber
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; David G Hicks; Mitch Dowsett; Lisa M McShane; Kimberly H Allison; Donald C Allred; John M S Bartlett; Michael Bilous; Patrick Fitzgibbons; Wedad Hanna; Robert B Jenkins; Pamela B Mangu; Soonmyung Paik; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Patricia A Spears; Gail H Vance; Giuseppe Viale; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 5.534

10.  Knowledge and Practice Patterns Among Pulmonologists for Molecular Biomarker Testing in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Adam H Fox; James R Jett; Upal Basu Roy; Bruce E Johnson; Jennifer C King; Nikki Martin; Raymond U Osarogiagbon; M Patricia Rivera; Lauren S Rosenthal; Robert A Smith; Gerard A Silvestri
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 9.410

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.