BACKGROUND: Eighteen to twenty percent of breast cancer tumors show abnormal amplification of the Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) gene and increased expression of the associated protein. HER2 amplification is associated with rapid tumor proliferation and shorter disease-free and overall survival. Because women with HER2 amplification are more likely to benefit from treatment with the drug trastuzumab, testing for HER2 is recommended to guide therapy. However, little is known about use of HER2 testing in real-world settings. This study examined uptake, use, appropriateness of HER2 testing, and the relationship between HER2 test results and treatment decisions. METHODS: We assessed electronic data from 3,634 patients with invasive breast cancer diagnosed from 1998 to 2007 in a large integrated health system. We collected data on patient and tumor characteristics, HER2 testing status, test results, and trastuzumab treatment. RESULTS: From 1998 to 2000, the percent of patients who underwent HER2 evaluation increased from 12 to 94%; <3% of women with ductal carcinoma in situ, for whom HER2 testing is not recommended, were tested. Trastuzumab use increased 5-fold after 2004, when guidelines expanded to include recommending adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer in addition to metastatic treatment. Ninety-five percent of women receiving trastuzumab had a positive HER2 result. After 2004, 55% of women with invasive breast cancer and overexpression of HER2 received trastuzumab treatment; this ranged from 44% of women with localized breast cancer to 80% of women with distant metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: These findings illustrate appropriate and effective implementation of a HER2 testing strategy in a managed care setting.
BACKGROUND: Eighteen to twenty percent of breast cancer tumors show abnormal amplification of the Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) gene and increased expression of the associated protein. HER2 amplification is associated with rapid tumor proliferation and shorter disease-free and overall survival. Because women with HER2 amplification are more likely to benefit from treatment with the drug trastuzumab, testing for HER2 is recommended to guide therapy. However, little is known about use of HER2 testing in real-world settings. This study examined uptake, use, appropriateness of HER2 testing, and the relationship between HER2 test results and treatment decisions. METHODS: We assessed electronic data from 3,634 patients with invasive breast cancer diagnosed from 1998 to 2007 in a large integrated health system. We collected data on patient and tumor characteristics, HER2 testing status, test results, and trastuzumab treatment. RESULTS: From 1998 to 2000, the percent of patients who underwent HER2 evaluation increased from 12 to 94%; <3% of women with ductal carcinoma in situ, for whom HER2 testing is not recommended, were tested. Trastuzumab use increased 5-fold after 2004, when guidelines expanded to include recommending adjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer in addition to metastatic treatment. Ninety-five percent of women receiving trastuzumab had a positive HER2 result. After 2004, 55% of women with invasive breast cancer and overexpression of HER2 received trastuzumab treatment; this ranged from 44% of women with localized breast cancer to 80% of women with distant metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS: These findings illustrate appropriate and effective implementation of a HER2 testing strategy in a managed care setting.
Authors: Robert W Carlson; D Craig Allred; Benjamin O Anderson; Harold J Burstein; W Bradford Carter; Stephen B Edge; John K Erban; William B Farrar; Lori J Goldstein; William J Gradishar; Daniel F Hayes; Clifford A Hudis; Mohammad Jahanzeb; Krystyna Kiel; Britt-Marie Ljung; P Kelly Marcom; Ingrid A Mayer; Beryl McCormick; Lisle M Nabell; Lori J Pierce; Elizabeth C Reed; Mary Lou Smith; George Somlo; Richard L Theriault; Neal S Topham; John H Ward; Eric P Winer; Antonio C Wolff Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Robert W Carlson; Susan J Moench; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Edith A Perez; Harold J Burstein; D Craig Allred; Charles L Vogel; Lori J Goldstein; George Somlo; William J Gradishar; Clifford A Hudis; Mohammad Jahanzeb; Azadeh Stark; Antonio C Wolff; Michael F Press; Eric P Winer; Soonmyung Paik; Britt-Marie Ljung Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Allison W Kurian; Rebecca Newton Thompson; Allison F Gaw; Sally Arai; Rafael Ortiz; Alan M Garber Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-02-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-12-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Taylor Murray; Jiaquan Xu; Michael J Thun Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2007 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Soe Soe Thwin; Kerri M Clough-Gorr; Maribet C McCarty; Timothy L Lash; Sharon H Alford; Diana S M Buist; Shelley M Enger; Terry S Field; Floyd Frost; Feifei Wei; Rebecca A Silliman Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2007-06-18 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Julian C Schink; Julia R Trosman; Christine B Weldon; Kalliopi P Siziopikou; Gregory J Tsongalis; Alfred W Rademaker; Jyoti D Patel; Al B Benson; Edith A Perez; William J Gradishar Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2014-09-12 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Amir Bahrami-Ahmadi; Fariborz Makarian; Mohammad R Mortazavizadeh; Mohammad F Yazdi; Mehdi Chamani Journal: J Res Med Sci Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: Michelle D Hackshaw; Heather E Danysh; Jasmeet Singh; Mary E Ritchey; Amy Ladner; Corina Taitt; D Ross Camidge; Hiroji Iwata; Charles A Powell Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-06-26 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; David G Hicks; Mitch Dowsett; Lisa M McShane; Kimberly H Allison; Donald C Allred; John M S Bartlett; Michael Bilous; Patrick Fitzgibbons; Wedad Hanna; Robert B Jenkins; Pamela B Mangu; Soonmyung Paik; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Patricia A Spears; Gail H Vance; Giuseppe Viale; Daniel F Hayes Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2013-10-07 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: Ilia L Ferrusi; Craig C Earle; Maureen Trudeau; Natasha B Leighl; Eleanor Pullenayegum; Hoa Khong; Jeffrey S Hoch; Deborah A Marshall Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Christina Ross; Karol Szczepanek; Maxwell Lee; Howard Yang; Tinghu Qiu; Jack D Sanford; Kent Hunter Journal: PLoS Genet Date: 2020-05-28 Impact factor: 5.917