Literature DB >> 1555293

Successful and reproducible myocardial opacification during two-dimensional echocardiography from right heart injection of contrast.

F S Villanueva1, W P Glasheen, J Sklenar, A R Jayaweera, S Kaul.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myocardial contrast echocardiography currently involves intro-arterial injection of contrast. For this technique to have a broader application, it is necessary that myocardial opacification be achieved from a venous injection of contrast. METHODS AND
RESULTS: To achieve myocardial opacification after right-side injection of contrast, two groups of open-chest anesthetized dogs were studied. Group 1 included nine dogs in whom microbubbles of various sizes, concentrations, and volumes were injected into the left atrium to determine microbubble characteristics that influence myocardial opacification. Group 2 included eight dogs in whom the effect of the combination of microbubble characteristics and myocardial blood flow on myocardial opacification was evaluated after right atrial injection of contrast. Background-subtracted time-intensity plots were generated from the myocardium to measure peak videointensity. In the group 2 dogs, digital subtraction and color coding were used to further highlight the contrast effect. The number, concentration, and size of the microbubbles all independently affected (p less than 0.01) peak myocardial videointensity after left atrial injection of contrast on multivariate analysis. Highly concentrated microbubbles (4.4 to 5.1 billion/ml) given during dipyridamole-induced coronary hyperemia was most frequently (88%) associated with myocardial opacification after right atrial injection of contrast and was the best predictor of this result on multivariate analysis (chi 2= 9.01, p = 0.003). No changes were noted in left atrial, left ventricular, and pulmonary artery pressures despite injection of large numbers of microbubbles into the right atrium.
CONCLUSIONS: Successful and reproducible myocardial opacification can be achieved during myocardial contrast echocardiography after right atrial injection of contrast. These findings could have far-reaching implications in the use of myocardial contrast echocardiography in acute and chronic ischemic syndromes in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1555293     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.85.4.1557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  12 in total

Review 1.  Section 8--clinical relevance. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 2.  Section 6--mechanical bioeffects in the presence of gas-carrier ultrasound contrast agents. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Section 7--discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Section 4--bioeffects in tissues with gas bodies. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  The mechanism and clinical implication of improved left ventricular videointensity following intravenous injection of multi-fold dilutions of albumin with dextrose.

Authors:  T R Porter; F Xie; A Kricsfeld
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1995-06

Review 6.  Insights into the assessment of myocardial perfusion offered by different cardiac imaging modalities.

Authors:  J R Lindner; S Kaul
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 7.  Contrast echocardiography for assessment of myocardial perfusion.

Authors:  R Leischik; J Rose; G Caspari; A Skyschally; G Heusch; R Erbel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 8.  New contrast agents and technologies for myocardial contrast echocardiography.

Authors:  D Rovai; M J Monaghan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Effect of power Doppler and digital subtraction techniques on the comparison of myocardial contrast echocardiography with SPECT.

Authors:  B Haluska; C Case; L Short; J Anderson; T H Marwick
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Testing the Efficacy of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Detecting Transplant Rejection Using a Murine Model of Heart Transplantation.

Authors:  K Fischer; S Ohori; F C Meral; M Uehara; S Giannini; T Ichimura; R N Smith; F A Jolesz; I Guleria; Y Zhang; P J White; N J McDannold; K Hoffmeister; M M Givertz; R Abdi
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.