Literature DB >> 11409104

Grounding spatial language in perception: an empirical and computational investigation.

T Regier1, L A Carlson.   

Abstract

The present paper grounds the linguistic cdategorization of space in aspects of visual perception; specifically, the structure of projective spatial terms such as above are grounded in the process of attention and in vector-sum coding of overall direction. This is formalized in the attentional vector-sum (AVS) model. This computational model accurately predicts linguistic acceptability judgments for spatial terms, under a variety of spatial configurations. In 7 experiments, the predictions of the AVS model are tested against those of 3 competing models. The results support the AVS model and disconfirm its competitors. The authors conclude that the structure of linguistic spatial categories can be partially explained in terms of independently motivated perceptual processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11409104     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.130.2.273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  13 in total

1.  Using spatial terms to select an object.

Authors:  L A Carlson; G D Logan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-09

2.  A neurobehavioral model of flexible spatial language behaviors.

Authors:  John Lipinski; Sebastian Schneegans; Yulia Sandamirskaya; John P Spencer; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The effect of occlusion on the semantics of projective spatial terms: a case study in grounding language in perception.

Authors:  John D Kelleher; Robert J Ross; Colm Sloan; Brian Mac Namee
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-12-08

4.  Source-goal asymmetries in motion representation: Implications for language production and comprehension.

Authors:  Anna Papafragou
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-08-01

5.  Spatial representation by young infants: categorization of spatial relations or sensitivity to a crossing primitive?

Authors:  Paul C Quinn
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-07

6.  Swing it to the left, swing it to the right: enacting flexible spatial language using a neurodynamic framework.

Authors:  John Lipinski; Yulia Sandamirskaya; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 5.082

7.  Developmental profiles for multiple object tracking and spatial memory: typically developing preschoolers and people with Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Kirsten O'Hearn; James E Hoffman; Barbara Landau
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2010-05

8.  Computer mouse tracking reveals motor signatures in a cognitive task of spatial language grounding.

Authors:  Jonas Lins; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Qualitative spatial logic descriptors from 3D indoor scenes to generate explanations in natural language.

Authors:  Zoe Falomir; Thomas Kluth
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2017-06-24

10.  Asymmetric coding of categorical spatial relations in both language and vision.

Authors:  J C Roth; S L Franconeri
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.