Literature DB >> 15548954

Parallel imaging at high field strength: synergies and joint potential.

Klaas P Pruessmann1.   

Abstract

MRI faces fundamental limitations in terms of sensitivity and speed. These limitations can be effectively tackled by the transition to higher field strengths and parallel imaging technology. Owing to largely independent physics, the two approaches can be readily combined. Considering the specific advantages and disadvantages of high field strength and parallel imaging, it is found that the combination is particularly synergistic. In the joint approach, the two concepts play different roles. Higher field strength acts as a source of higher baseline signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), while parallelization acts as a means of converting added SNR into a variety of alternative benefits. This interplay holds promise for a broad range of clinical applications, as recently illustrated by several imaging studies at 3 T. As a consequence, clinical MRI at 3 T and higher is expected to rely more on parallel acquisition than at lower field strength. The specific synergy with parallel imaging may even make 3 T the field strength of choice for a range of exams that conventionally work best at 1.5 T or less.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15548954     DOI: 10.1097/01.rmr.0000139297.66742.4e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0899-3459


  39 in total

1.  Facial Expressions Evoke Differential Neural Coupling in Macaques.

Authors:  Ning Liu; Fadila Hadj-Bouziane; Rosalyn Moran; Leslie G Ungerleider; Alumit Ishai
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging at ultrahigh fields.

Authors:  Kamil Ugurbil
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Advantages and pitfalls in 3T MR brain imaging: a pictorial review.

Authors:  Bernd L Schmitz; Andrik J Aschoff; Martin H K Hoffmann; Georg Grön
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Integrated head-thoracic vascular MRI at 3 T: assessment of cranial, cervical and thoracic involvement of giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  T A Bley; O Wieben; M Uhl; N Miehle; M Langer; J Hennig; M Markl
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2005-08-29       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Rapid vessel prototyping: vascular modeling using 3t magnetic resonance angiography and rapid prototyping technology.

Authors:  Michael Markl; Ralf Schumacher; Jürg Küffer; Thorsten A Bley; Jürgen Hennig
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Accelerated time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T: clinical experience in 31 patients.

Authors:  Alex Frydrychowicz; Thorsten A Bley; Jan T Winterer; Andreas Harloff; Mathias Langer; Jürgen Hennig; Michael Markl
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2006-08-26       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 7.  Muskuloskeletal MR imaging at 3.0 T: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Nicolae Bolog; Daniel Nanz; Dominik Weishaupt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Intracranial contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography with 6.4-fold sensitivity encoding at 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Houchun H Hu; Clifton R Haider; Norbert G Campeau; John Huston; Stephen J Riederer
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  MR Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System Using Ultrahigh Field (7T) MR Imaging.

Authors:  Hamza Alizai; Gregory Chang; Ravinder R Regatte
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2018-10

10.  An RF dosimeter for independent SAR measurement in MRI scanners.

Authors:  Di Qian; Abdel-Monem M El-Sharkawy; Paul A Bottomley; William A Edelstein
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.