Literature DB >> 26809191

The effects of body mass index on the hereditary influences that determine peak bone mass in mother-daughter pairs (KNHANES V).

K M Kim1,2, Y J Kim1,2, S H Choi1,2, S Lim1,2, J H Moon1,2, J H Kim2,3, S W Kim2,4, H C Jang1,2, C S Shin5,6.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: A daughter's bone mineral density (BMD) is significantly correlated with her mother's BMD, but the daughter's body mass index (BMI) could modulate this association. Maternal inheritance dominantly affects daughters with a lower BMI, but BMI could compensate for hereditary influences in daughters with a higher BMI in terms of daughter's BMD.
INTRODUCTION: Achieving optimal peak bone mass at a young age is the best way to protect against future osteoporosis and subsequent fractures. Although environmental components influence bone mass accrual, but peak bone mass is largely programmed by inheritance. The aims of this study were to investigate the influence of maternal inheritance on the daughter's bone mass and to assess whether these influences differ according to the daughter's body mass index (BMI).
METHODS: We used data obtained from the 2010 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey V and included 187 mother-daughter pairs. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at the lumbar spine (LS), femur neck (FN), and total hip (TH) by using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The daughter group was stratified into two groups according to the mean BMI (21.4 kg/m(2)).
RESULTS: The daughters' BMD correlated significantly with both their BMI and their mothers' Z-score for each skeletal site. In the daughters with a lower BMI (≤21.4 kg/m(2)), the BMDs at the FN and TH were affected more by the mothers' Z-score than by the daughters' BMI. Meanwhile, the influence of the daughters' BMI on their BMD was higher than that of their mothers' Z-score in daughters with a higher BMI (>21.4 kg/m(2)). Moreover, the mothers' Z-scores were a significant predictor of their daughters having Z-scores < -1.0 only in daughters with a lower BMI.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that maternal inheritance is an important determinant of the daughters' bone mass, but that this hereditary factor may vary according to the daughters' BMI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Body mass index; Bone mineral density; Genetic inheritance; Osteoporosis; Peak bone mass

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26809191     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-016-3487-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  30 in total

1.  Measurement of bone mineral density in mother-daughter pairs for evaluating the family influence on bone mass acquisition: a GRIO survey.

Authors:  N Barthe; B Basse-Cathalinat; P J Meunier; C Ribot; X Marchandise; J P Sabatier; P Braillon; J Thevenot; B Sutter
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Associations between maternal peak bone mass and bone mass in prepubertal male and female children.

Authors:  G Jones; T V Nguyen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Influence of maternal genetic and lifestyle factors on bone mineral density in adolescent daughters: a cohort study in 387 Japanese daughter-mother pairs.

Authors:  Tatsuhiko Kuroda; Yoshiko Onoe; Yuko Miyabara; Remi Yoshikata; Seiya Orito; Ken Ishitani; Hiroya Okano; Hiroaki Ohta
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2009-02-27       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Familial resemblance of bone mineral density (BMD) and calcaneal ultrasound attenuation: the BMD in mothers and daughters study.

Authors:  M E Danielson; J A Cauley; C E Baker; A B Newman; J S Dorman; J D Towers; L H Kuller
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 5.  FRAX updates 2012.

Authors:  Eugene McCloskey; John A Kanis
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 5.006

Review 6.  Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Steven R Cummings; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-05-18       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Genome-wide association study of bone mineral density in premenopausal European-American women and replication in African-American women.

Authors:  Daniel L Koller; Shoji Ichikawa; Dongbing Lai; Leah R Padgett; Kimberly F Doheny; Elizabeth Pugh; Justin Paschall; Siu L Hui; Howard J Edenberg; Xiaoling Xuei; Munro Peacock; Michael J Econs; Tatiana Foroud
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Familial comparison of bone mineral density at the proximal femur and lumbar spine.

Authors:  H A McKay; D A Bailey; A A Wilkinson; C S Houston
Journal:  Bone Miner       Date:  1994-02

Review 9.  Ethnic and genetic differences in bone mass: a review with a hereditary vs environmental perspective.

Authors:  W S Pollitzer; J J Anderson
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 7.045

10.  A family history of fracture and fracture risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J A Kanis; H Johansson; A Oden; O Johnell; C De Laet; J A Eisman; E V McCloskey; D Mellstrom; L J Melton; H A P Pols; J Reeve; A J Silman; A Tenenhouse
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  2 in total

1.  Site-Specific Difference of Bone Geometry Indices in Hypoparathyroid Patients.

Authors:  Hye Sun Park; Da Hea Seo; Yumie Rhee; Sung Kil Lim
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab (Seoul)       Date:  2017-02-06

2.  Muscle mass is a strong correlation factor of total hip BMD among Korean premenopausal women.

Authors:  Jee Eun Lee; Sa Ra Lee; Hye-Kyung Song
Journal:  Osteoporos Sarcopenia       Date:  2016-06-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.