Literature DB >> 15541696

Minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Sang-Ho Lee1, Won-Gyu Choi, Sang-Rak Lim, Ho-Yeong Kang, Song-Woo Shin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Most surgeons have thought that posterior decompression is necessary to treat isthmic spondylolisthesis with leg pain. However, the surgical procedure not only requires wide muscle dissection but can also lead to spinal instability. The authors' treatment concept for isthmic spondylolisthesis is one-stage anterior reduction and posterior stabilization with minimally invasive surgical procedure without touching the spinal thecal sac and nerve.
PURPOSE: To investigate a new surgical concept of minimally invasive anterior-posterior fusion without posterior decompression for the treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis with leg pain. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective study of 73 patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis who underwent minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion (mini-ALIF) followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PF) between October 2000 and February 2002. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 73 patients with low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis (46 with Grade 1 and 27 with Grade 2) who underwent mini-ALIF followed by percutaneous PF were retrospectively analyzed. There were 20 men and 53 women, with a mean age of 50.6 (range, 19 to 77) years. All patients had low back pain and referred or radicular leg pain or neurogenic intermittent claudication in walking or standing. Average duration of symptoms was 26 (range, 3 to 120) months. OUTCOME MEASURES: The clinical outcome was graded according to the modified Macnab criteria.
METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed clinical and radiological data of 73 patients who had isthmic spondylolisthesis. All patients underwent mini-ALIF and percutaneous PF on the same day between October 2000 and February 2002. The mean follow-up period was 16 months (range, 12 to 26).
RESULTS: The mean operating time, blood loss and hospital stay were 210 minutes, 135 ml and 4.1 days, respectively. No blood transfusion was necessary. Clinical outcome was excellent in 26 patients (35.6%), good in 43 (58.9%), fair in 3 (4.1%) and poor in 1 (1.4%). The fusion rate was 97.3% (71 of 73). There were 6 cases (8.2%) of mini-ALIF complications and 6 (8.2%) of percutaneous PF complications. There were no postoperative neurologic deficits.
CONCLUSIONS: Mini-ALIF followed by percutaneous PF is an efficacious alternative for low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis, and posterior decompression is not necessary to relieve leg symptoms. This minimally invasive combined procedure offers many advantages, such as preservation of posterior arch, no nerve retraction, less blood loss, excellent cosmetic results, high fusion rate and early discharge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15541696     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  25 in total

1.  Minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for patients previously treated by open discectomy and decompression of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Jian Wang; Yue Zhou; Zheng Feng Zhang; Chang Qing Li; Wen Jie Zheng; Jie Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Changes in the adjacent segment 10 years after anterior lumbar interbody fusion for low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Kyung-Chul Choi; Jin-Sung Kim; Hyeong-Ki Shim; Yong Ahn; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Mini-open lateral retroperitoneal lumbar spine approach using psoas muscle retraction technique. Technical report and initial results on six patients.

Authors:  Kamran Aghayev; Frank D Vrionis
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Current concepts on spinal arthrodesis in degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Marios G Lykissas; Alexander Aichmair
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 1.337

5.  Comparison of open versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion in a sheep model.

Authors:  W Lehmann; A Ushmaev; A Ruecker; J Nuechtern; L Grossterlinden; P G Begemann; T Baeumer; J M Rueger; D Briem
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: is it worth it?

Authors:  Frederic Jacquot; Daniel Gastambide
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Anterior interbody arthrodesis with percutaneous posterior pedicle fixation for degenerative conditions of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  D Greg Anderson; Amirali Sayadipour; Kevin Shelby; Todd J Albert; Alexander R Vaccaro; Michael S Weinstein
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  How safe is minimally invasive pedicle screw placement for treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures?

Authors:  Timo Michael Heintel; Stefan Dannigkeit; Annabel Fenwick; Martin Cornelius Jordan; Hendrik Jansen; Fabian Gilbert; Rainer Meffert
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Minimally invasive anterior, lateral, and oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review.

Authors:  David S Xu; Corey T Walker; Jakub Godzik; Jay D Turner; William Smith; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-03

10.  Comparison between Instrumented Mini-TLIF and Instrumented Circumferential Fusion in Adult Low-Grade Lytic Spondylolisthesis : Can Mini-TLIF with PPF Replace Circumferential Fusion?

Authors:  Jin-Sung Kim; Dong-Hyun Kim; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.