Literature DB >> 29707553

Minimally invasive anterior, lateral, and oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review.

David S Xu1, Corey T Walker1, Jakub Godzik1, Jay D Turner1, William Smith2, Juan S Uribe1.   

Abstract

Lumbar interbody fusion involves insertion of a structural graft into an intervertebral disc space to promote bony arthrodesis. It is a well-established surgical strategy for multiple spinal disorders ranging from degenerative conditions to trauma, neoplastic diseases, and deformities requiring correction. Since the inception of lumbar interbody fusion, the most established techniques have been two posterior approaches, the posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and the transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). Within the past 15 years, multiple anterolateral approaches to the spine have become widely adopted. These approaches can be performed minimally invasively and spare disruption of the paraspinal muscles and posterior spinal column while enabling wide exposure of the disc space for insertion of interbody grafts much larger than PLIF and TLIF instrumentation. This review highlights three minimally invasive anterolateral approaches: the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), the transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), and prepsoas or anterior to the psoas oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF). Relevant topics for discussion and comparison include patient selection, surgical techniques, outcomes, and complications for the three surgical approaches.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF); extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF); lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF); minimally invasive surgery (MIS); oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF); spinal fusion

Year:  2018        PMID: 29707553      PMCID: PMC5900070          DOI: 10.21037/atm.2018.03.24

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Transl Med        ISSN: 2305-5839


  37 in total

1.  Mini-open oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) approach for multi-level discectomy and fusion involving L5-S1: Preliminary experience.

Authors:  F Zairi; T P Sunna; H J Westwick; A G Weil; Z Wang; G Boubez; D Shedid
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.256

2.  Outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery based on indication: a prospective study.

Authors:  Prashanth J Rao; Ajanthan Loganathan; Vivian Yeung; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Video-assisted versus open anterior lumbar spine fusion surgery: a comparison of four techniques and complications in 135 patients.

Authors:  Enrique Escobar; Ensor Transfeldt; Timothy Garvey; James Ogilvie; John Graber; Leonard Schultz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Fusion rate following extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Pedro Berjano; Francesco Langella; Marco Damilano; Matteo Pejrona; Josip Buric; Maryem Ismael; Jorge Hugo Villafañe; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Elimination of Subsidence with 26-mm-Wide Cages in Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion.

Authors:  Gernot Lang; Rodrigo Navarro-Ramirez; Lena Gandevia; Ibrahim Hussain; Jonathan Nakhla; Micaella Zubkov; Roger Härtl
Journal:  World Neurosurg       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 2.104

6.  Abdominal wall paresis as a complication of minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion.

Authors:  Elias Dakwar; Tien V Le; Ali A Baaj; Anh X Le; William D Smith; Behrooz A Akbarnia; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.047

7.  Subsidence following anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF): a prospective study.

Authors:  Prashanth J Rao; Kevin Phan; Gloria Giang; Monish M Maharaj; Steven Phan; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

8.  Visceral and vascular complications resulting from anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  V Rajaraman; R Vingan; P Roth; R F Heary; L Conklin; G B Jacobs
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Subsidence of polyetheretherketone intervertebral cages in minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Tien V Le; Ali A Baaj; Elias Dakwar; Clinton J Burkett; Gisela Murray; Donald A Smith; Juan S Uribe
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Radiographic and clinical evaluation of cage subsidence after stand-alone lateral interbody fusion.

Authors:  Luis Marchi; Nitamar Abdala; Leonardo Oliveira; Rodrigo Amaral; Etevaldo Coutinho; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2013-05-10
View more
  48 in total

1.  The prone transpsoas technique: preliminary radiographic results of a multicenter experience.

Authors:  Luiz Pimenta; Rodrigo Amaral; William Taylor; Antoine Tohmeh; Gabriel Pokorny; Raquel Rodrigues; Daniel Arnoni; Thyago Guirelli; Matheus Batista
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Does the hip positioning matter for oblique lumbar interbody fusion approach? A morphometric study.

Authors:  Kaissar Farah; Henri-Arthur Leroy; Melodie-Anne Karnoub; Louis Obled; Stephane Fuentes; Richard Assaker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Minimally invasive posterior pedicle screw fixation versus open instrumentation in patients with thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis.

Authors:  Insa Katrin Janssen; Ann-Kathrin Jörger; Melanie Barz; Chiara Sarkar; Maria Wostrack; Bernhard Meyer
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Three-dimensional gait quantitative analysis in postoperative rehabilitation of lumbar degenerative diseases: a self-controlled before-after study.

Authors:  Chao Zhou; Haipeng Xia; Jun Yin; Yanping Zheng
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Effect of pedicle-screw rod fixation on oblique lumbar interbody fusion in patients with osteoporosis: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Kaiwen Cai; Kefeng Luo; Jinjin Zhu; Kai Zhang; Shengkai Yu; Yi Ye; Guoqiang Jiang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.359

6.  [Application of small incision approach in anterior surgery of thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis].

Authors:  Jiandang Shi; Jinwen He; Ningkui Niu; Zongqiang Yang; Haifeng Yuan; Huiqiang Ding
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-06-15

7.  Reliability of the new modified Moro's classification and oblique corridor grading to assess the feasibility of oblique lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Arun-Kumar Kaliya-Perumal; Julia Poh Hwee Ng; Tamara Lee Ting Soh; Wayne Ming Quan Yap; Mark Tan; Chun Sing Yu; Jacob Yoong-Leong Oh
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-06-06

8.  MRI-Based Morphometric Study Regarding Operative Windows of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Indian Population.

Authors:  Rahul Kaul; Khemendra Kumar; Madhan Jeyaraman; Bharat Goswami; Milind Chandra Choudhary; H S Chhabra; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 1.251

9.  Learning Curve and Complications Experience of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion : A Single-Center 143 Consecutive Cases.

Authors:  Bu Kwang Oh; Dong Wuk Son; Su Hun Lee; Jun Seok Lee; Soon Ki Sung; Sang Weon Lee; Geun Sung Song
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2021-04-30

10.  [Comparison of CLIF and TLIF in treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis combined with lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  Di Zhang; Wenming Zhang; Xianwei Zhou; Song Jin
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-02-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.