Literature DB >> 28710609

Laparoscopic colectomy in the obese, morbidly obese, and super morbidly obese: when does weight matter?

Bradley J Champagne1, Madhuri Nishtala2, Justin T Brady2, Benjamin P Crawshaw2, Morris E Franklin3, Conor P Delaney4, Scott R Steele5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Previous studies have demonstrated that obese patients (BMI >30) undergoing laparoscopic colectomy have longer operative times and increased complications when compared to non-obese cohorts. However, there is little data that specifically evaluates the outcomes of obese patients based on the degree of their obesity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of increasing severity of obesity on patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy.
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy between 1996 and 2013. Patients were classified according to their BMI as obese (BMI 30.0-39.9), morbidly obese (BMI 40.0-49.9), and super obese (BMI >50). Main outcome measures included conversion rate, operative time, estimated blood loss, post-operative complications, and length of stay.
RESULTS: There were 923 patients who met inclusion criteria. Overall, 604 (65.4%), 257 (27.9%), and 62 (6.7%) were classified as obese (O), morbidly obese (MO), and super obese (SO), respectively. Clinicopathologic characteristics were similar among the three groups. The SO group had significantly higher conversion rates (17.7 vs. 7 vs. 4.8%; P = 0.031), longer average hospital stays (7.1 days vs. 4.9 vs. 3.4; P = 0.001), higher morbidity (40.3 vs. 16.3 vs. 12.4%; P = 0.001), and longer operative times (206 min vs. 184 vs. 163; P = 0.04) compared to the MO and O groups, respectively. The anastomotic leak rate in the SO (4.8%; P = 0.027) and MO males (4.1%; P = 0.033) was significantly higher than MO females (2.2%) and all obese patients (1.8%).
CONCLUSION: Increasing severity of obesity is associated with worse perioperative outcomes following laparoscopic colectomy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopic colectomy; Obesity; Outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28710609     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2865-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  26 in total

1.  The impact of obesity on outcomes following major surgery for Crohn's disease: an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program assessment.

Authors:  Marlin W Causey; Eric K Johnson; Seth Miller; Matthew Martin; Justin Maykel; Scott R Steele
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.585

2.  Outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in obese and nonobese patients: a case-matched study of 180 patients.

Authors:  Sandrine Kamoun; Arnaud Alves; Frédéric Bretagnol; Jeremy H Lefevre; Patrice Valleur; Yves Panis
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Short and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy in obese patients.

Authors:  Andrea Vignali; Paola De Nardi; Luca Ghirardelli; Saverio Di Palo; Carlo Staudacher
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Impact of visceral obesity on short-term outcome after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a single Japanese center study.

Authors:  Nobuhiro Nitori; Hirotoshi Hasegawa; Yoshiyuki Ishii; Takashi Endo; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.719

5.  Laparoscopic colectomy reduces morbidity and mortality in obese patients.

Authors:  Karin Hardiman; Eric T Chang; Brian S Diggs; Kim C Lu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Surgical site infections and cost in obese patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Wick; Kenzo Hirose; Andrew D Shore; Jeanne M Clark; Susan L Gearhart; Jonathan Efron; Martin A Makary
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2011-05-16

7.  Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Antony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 8.  The impact of obesity on outcome after major colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Kelly A Gendall; Sumit Raniga; Ross Kennedy; Frank A Frizelle
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Effect of body mass index on short-term outcomes after colectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Ryan P Merkow; Karl Y Bilimoria; Martin D McCarter; David J Bentrem
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Predictive factors for surgical complications of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chikara Kunisaki; Hirochika Makino; Ryo Takagawa; Kei Sato; Mayumi Kawamata; Amane Kanazawa; Naoto Yamamoto; Yasuhiko Nagano; Shoichi Fujii; Hidetaka A Ono; Hirotoshi Akiyama; Hiroshi Shimada
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  6 in total

1.  Specific features of colorectal cancer in patients with metabolic syndrome: a matched case-control analysis of 772 patients.

Authors:  Alban Zarzavadjian Le Bian; Christine Denet; Nicolas Tabchouri; Gianfranco Donatelli; Philippe Wind; Christophe Louvet; Mostefa Bennamoun; Christos Christidis; Thierry Perniceni; David Fuks; Brice Gayet
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Outcomes of Ileal Pouch Excision: an American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) Analysis.

Authors:  Sebastien Lachance; Maria Abou-Khalil; Carol-Ann Vasilevsky; Gabriela Ghitulescu; Nancy Morin; Julio Faria; Marylise Boutros
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal surgery in obese and morbidly obese patients: ACS-NSQIP analysis.

Authors:  Sinan Albayati; Kerry Hitos; Christophe R Berney; Matthew J Morgan; Nimalan Pathma-Nathan; Toufic El-Khoury; Arthur Richardson; Daniel I Chu; Jamie Cannon; Greg Kennedy; James Wei Tatt Toh
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2022-10-21

4.  Limited preoperative physical capacity continues to be associated with poor postoperative outcomes within a colorectal ERAS programme.

Authors:  E McLennan; R Oliphant; S J Moug
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Minimally invasive colorectal surgery in the morbid obese: does size really matter?

Authors:  Sofoklis Panteleimonitis; Sotirios Popeskou; Mick Harper; Ngianga Kandala; Nuno Figueiredo; Tahseen Qureshi; Amjad Parvaiz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Impact of body mass index on robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy.

Authors:  Zeng Yap; Won Woong Kim; Sang-Wook Kang; Cho Rok Lee; Jandee Lee; Jong Ju Jeong; Kee-Hyun Nam; Woong Youn Chung
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.