Literature DB >> 19756876

A standardized technique for laparoscopic rectal resection.

Rolv-Ole Lindsetmo1, Conor P Delaney.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic rectal resection (LRR) has not gained the same acceptance as laparoscopic segmental colonic resection because of technical challenges, increased operating time and costs, and concerns about the oncological outcome. DISCUSSION: One way to overcome these challenges is by standardizing the laparoscopic technique in the same way as has been done with the open rectal cancer surgery. We have established a standardized, stepwise laparoscopic procedure for rectal resections that enhances the transformation of laparoscopic skills, identifies indications for conversion early in the operation, and makes the operation predictable and reproducible for the whole surgical team.
CONCLUSION: We believe this saves time in the operating room and builds up laparoscopic team expertise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19756876     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-009-1033-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  23 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of the circumferential resection margin following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  A Wibe; P R Rendedal; E Svensson; J Norstein; T J Eide; H E Myrvold; O Søreide
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcome after laparoscopic or open colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Ravi P Kiran; Anthony J Senagore; Karen Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Results of a standardized technique and postoperative care plan for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a 30-month experience.

Authors:  Anthony J Senagore; Hans J Duepree; Conor P Delaney; Karen M Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  Marco Braga; Matteo Frasson; Andrea Vignali; Walter Zuliani; Giovanni Capretti; Valerio Di Carlo
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 5.  Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  S Breukink; J Pierie; T Wiggers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-10-18

6.  Clinical outcomes and cost analysis of a "fast track" postoperative care pathway for ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a case control study.

Authors:  Yehuda Kariv; Conor P Delaney; Anthony J Senagore; Elena A Manilich; Jeffrey P Hammel; James M Church; Jeffrey Ravas; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Antony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer: a prospective analysis of thirty-month follow-up outcomes in 312 patients.

Authors:  Seon-Hahn Kim; In-Ja Park; Yong-Geul Joh; Koo-Yong Hahn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Mesorectal grades predict recurrences after curative resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sushil Maslekar; Abhiram Sharma; Alistair Macdonald; James Gunn; John R T Monson; John E Hartley
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Transanal total mesorectal excision: a systematic review of the experimental and clinical evidence.

Authors:  S E Araujo; B Crawshaw; C R Mendes; C P Delaney
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-11-09       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Integration of open and laparoscopic approaches for rectal cancer resection: oncologic and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Ki-Jae Park; Knut-Magne Augestad; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Low rectal cancer: Sphincter preserving techniques-selection of patients, techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Nikoletta Dimitriou; Othon Michail; Dimitrios Moris; John Griniatsos
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-07-15

4.  Implementation of a standardized surgical technique in robot-assisted restorative rectal cancer resection: a single center cohort study.

Authors:  Jacob Damgaard Eriksen; Henriette Vind Thaysen; Katrine Jøssing Emmertsen; Anders Husted Madsen; Anders Tøttrup; Charlotte Buchard Nørager; Ken Ljungmann; Niels Thomassen; Conor Patrick Delaney; Lene Hjerrild Iversen
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 2.030

5.  The implementation of a standardized approach to laparoscopic rectal surgery.

Authors:  Katrine Kanstrup Aslak; Orhan Bulut
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.