Literature DB >> 15533370

High pregnancy rates can be achieved after freezing and thawing human blastocysts.

Lucinda L Veeck1, Richard Bodine, Robert N Clarke, Rosemary Berrios, Joanne Libraro, Rose Marie Moschini, Nikica Zaninovic, Zev Rosenwaks.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the results of a 3-year trial using blastocyst cryopreservation to limit multiple pregnancy and optimize overall pregnancy per cycle.
DESIGN: Retrospective clinical evaluation of pregnancy rates after freezing and thawing human blastocysts.
SETTING: Tertiary-care academic center. PATIENT(S): Seven hundred fifty-three different patients treated in 783 IVF cycles with blastocysts frozen from July 2000 to June 2003. INTERVENTION(S): Two thousand, two hundred fifty-nine blastocysts were frozen in cycles in which only blastocysts were cryopreserved (cycles with pronuclear stage oocytes or pre-embryos also cryopreserved were excluded from the analysis). Of these, 628 (27.6%) were thawed in 218 cycles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pregnancy rate per cycle with thaw. RESULT(S): Four hundred seventy-nine (76.3%) blastocysts survived thawing, and 440 (92.0%) were transferred after exhibiting evidence of survival (most commonly, blastocoele reexpansion). In cycles with a thaw, 211 (96.8%) of 218 underwent intrauterine transfer. An average of 2.09 blastocysts was transferred per replacement. One hundred twenty-five (59.2%) clinical pregnancies were established, which included 23 sets of twins and 5 triplet gestations. Two sets of monozygotic twins were identified after the replacement of a single thawed blastocyst (1.6%). The age of the patient at the time of cryopreservation (<37 years) was an important factor in the establishment of clinical and ongoing pregnancy. The mode of ovarian stimulation, replacement method, and whether blastocysts were frozen on day 5 or day 6 of development did not demonstrate clinical significance. CONCLUSION(S): Cryopreserved and thawed blastocysts demonstrated a similar potential for implantation when compared with fresh pre-embryos on day 3. On the basis of these results, the blastocyst stage of development appears to be optimal for clinical freeze-thaw trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15533370     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.03.068

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  17 in total

1.  Cumulus-corona gene expression analysis combined with morphological embryo scoring in single embryo transfer cycles increases live birth after fresh transfer and decreases time to pregnancy.

Authors:  T Adriaenssens; I Van Vaerenbergh; W Coucke; I Segers; G Verheyen; E Anckaert; M De Vos; J Smitz
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Trophectoderm morphology predicts outcomes of pregnancy in vitrified-warmed single-blastocyst transfer cycle in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Xiaojiao Chen; Junqiang Zhang; Xun Wu; Shanren Cao; Lin Zhou; Ying Wang; Xin Chen; Jin Lu; Chun Zhao; Minjian Chen; Xiufeng Ling
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Elective cryopreservation of all day 5 blastocysts is more effective than using day 6 blastocysts for improving pregnancy outcome in stimulated cycles.

Authors:  Setsuko Yamamoto; Michiko Umeki; Teruhiro Hamano; Fujiyo Matsusita; Kimiko Kuwahara
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-17

4.  Ovarian stimulation and in-vitro fertilization outcomes of cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation compared to age matched controls: a 17-year experience.

Authors:  Eden R Cardozo; Alexcis P Thomson; Anatte E Karmon; Kristy A Dickinson; Diane L Wright; Mary E Sabatini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Day 5 expanded blastocysts transferred on same day have comparable outcome to those left for more extended culture and transferred on day 6.

Authors:  Eman Elgindy; Mervat Sheikh-El-Arab Elsedeek
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Fertility preservation for cancer patients: a review.

Authors:  Tosin Ajala; Junaid Rafi; Peter Larsen-Disney; Richard Howell
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2010-03-31

7.  Comprehensive analysis of karyotypic mosaicism between trophectoderm and inner cell mass.

Authors:  D S Johnson; C Cinnioglu; R Ross; A Filby; G Gemelos; M Hill; A Ryan; D Smotrich; M Rabinowitz; M J Murray
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  Comparison of clinical outcomes between single and double vitrified-warmed blastocyst embryo transfer according to the day of vitrification.

Authors:  Sang Min Kang; Sang Won Lee; San Hyun Yoon; Joo Cheol Kim; Jin Ho Lim; Seong Goo Lee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Blastocyst development rate impacts outcome in cryopreserved blastocyst transfer cycles.

Authors:  Eric D Levens; Brian W Whitcomb; Sasha Hennessy; Aidita N James; Belinda J Yauger; Frederick W Larsen
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  Factors affecting the outcome of human blastocyst vitrification.

Authors:  Amr A Kader; Audrey Choi; Yasser Orief; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.