Literature DB >> 25595540

Ovarian stimulation and in-vitro fertilization outcomes of cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation compared to age matched controls: a 17-year experience.

Eden R Cardozo1, Alexcis P Thomson, Anatte E Karmon, Kristy A Dickinson, Diane L Wright, Mary E Sabatini.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes of cancer patients who underwent oocyte retrieval and embryo/oocyte cryopreservation prior to gonadotoxic therapy to those of age and time-matched controls with tubal factor infertility.
METHODS: All cancer patients who underwent embryo/oocyte cryopreservation at our institution from 1997 to 2014 were reviewed. Primary outcomes were total dose of gonadotropins used, number of oocytes retrieved, and number of 2pn embryos obtained. Outcomes were compared to age-matched controls with tubal-factor infertility who underwent a fresh embryo transfer within the same relative time period as the IVF cycle of the cancer patient.
RESULTS: Sixty-three cancer patients underwent 65 IVF cycles, and 21 returned for frozen embryo transfer. One hundred twenty-two age-matched controls underwent IVF cycles with fresh transfer, and 23 returned for frozen embryo transfer. No difference was seen between cancer patients and controls with respect to total ampules of gonadotropin used (38.0 vs. 35.6 respectively; p = 0.28), number of oocytes retrieved (12.4 vs. 10.9 respectively; p = 0.36) and number of 2pn embryos obtained (6.6 vs. 7.1 respectively; p = 0.11). Cumulative pregnancy rate per transfer for cancer patients compared to controls was 37 vs. 43 % respectively (p = 0.49) and cumulative live birth rate per transfer was 30 vs. 32 % respectively (p = 0.85). Cancer patients had a higher likelihood of live birth resulting in twins (44 vs. 14 %; p = 0.035).
CONCLUSIONS: Most IVF outcomes appear comparable for cancer patients and age-matched controls. Higher twin pregnancy rates in cancer patients may reflect lack of underlying infertility or need for cancer-specific transfer guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25595540      PMCID: PMC4380886          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0428-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.412


  41 in total

Review 1.  Ovarian response to stimulation for fertility preservation in women with malignant disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shevach Friedler; Onder Koc; Yariv Gidoni; Arieh Raziel; Raphael Ron-El
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Adjuvant therapy enhances endometrial receptivity in patients undergoing assisted reproduction.

Authors:  John L Frattarelli; Bradley T Miller; Richard T Scott
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.828

3.  Fertility preservation and reproduction in patients facing gonadotoxic therapies: a committee opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Fertility Preservation Decisions Among Newly Diagnosed Oncology Patients: A Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Sahadat K Nurudeen; Nataki C Douglas; Erica L Mahany; Mark V Sauer; Janet M Choi
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 5.  Ovarian stimulation and fertility preservation with the use of aromatase inhibitors in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Jhansi Reddy; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Embryo yield after in vitro fertilization in women undergoing embryo banking for fertility preservation before chemotherapy.

Authors:  Audra D Robertson; Stacey A Missmer; Elizabeth S Ginsburg
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 7.329

7.  Low-dose aspirin in a short regimen as standard treatment in in vitro fertilization: a randomized, prospective study.

Authors:  Urban Waldenström; Dan Hellberg; Staffan Nilsson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  High pregnancy rate after early human embryo freezing.

Authors:  J Testart; B Lassalle; J Belaisch-Allart; A Hazout; R Forman; J D Rainhorn; R Frydman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 9.  Psychological aspects of fertility preservation in men and women affected by cancer and other life-threatening diseases.

Authors:  Sibil Tschudin; Johannes Bitzer
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009-05-10       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 10.  Preservation of fertility in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Jacqueline S Jeruss; Teresa K Woodruff
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  22 in total

1.  Utilization rates and results of long-term embryo cryopreservation before gonadotoxic treatment.

Authors:  M M Dolmans; S Hollanders de Ouderaen; D Demylle; C Pirard
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  MiR181c inhibits ovarian cancer metastasis and progression by targeting PRKCD expression.

Authors:  Lijuan Yao; Li Wang; Fengxia Li; Xihai Gao; Xuegong Wei; Zhihui Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

Review 3.  IVF for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients--efficacy and safety issues.

Authors:  M Shapira; H Raanani; D Meirow
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Thirteen years' experience in fertility preservation for cancer patients after in vitro fertilization and in vitro maturation treatments.

Authors:  Helene Creux; Patricia Monnier; Weon-Young Son; William Buckett
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-03-03       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Medical and elective fertility preservation: impact of removal of the experimental label from oocyte cryopreservation.

Authors:  Samantha B Schon; Maren Shapiro; Clarisa Gracia; Suneeta Senapati
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Sexuality, fertility and pregnancy following breast cancer treatment.

Authors:  Mary Lopresti; Tina Rizack; Don S Dizon
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2018-08

Review 7.  Late endocrine effects of childhood cancer.

Authors:  Susan R Rose; Vincent E Horne; Jonathan Howell; Sarah A Lawson; Meilan M Rutter; Gylynthia E Trotman; Sarah D Corathers
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 43.330

8.  Long-term outcomes in cancer patients who did or did not pursue fertility preservation.

Authors:  Molly B Moravek; Rafael Confino; Kristin N Smith; Ralph R Kazer; Susan C Klock; Angela K Lawson; William J Gradishar; Mary Ellen Pavone
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Antral follicle responsiveness to FSH, assessed by the follicular output rate (FORT), is altered in Hodgkin's lymphoma when compared with breast cancer candidates for fertility preservation.

Authors:  Charlotte Sonigo; Marjorie Comtet; Solene Duros; Christophe Sifer; Nathalie Sermondade; Michaël Grynberg
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 10.  Female fertility preservation: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Mary E Pavone; Rafael Confino; Marissa Steinberg
Journal:  Minerva Ginecol       Date:  2016-02-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.