Literature DB >> 24701541

Effectiveness of mini implants in three-dimensional control during retraction - a clinical study.

Deepak Victor1, Ramchandra Prabhakar2, M K Karthikeyan3, R Saravanan3, P Vanathi3, N Raj Vikram4, P Adarsh Reddy5, M Sudeepthi5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Three-dimensional control throughout the orthodontic treatment is essential for uncompromised results. Mini screws introduced for orthodontic anchorage has given the clinician an option of absolute three dimensional control. The purpose of this study was to compare and measure the vertical control and torque control of incisors and molar during enmass retraction with titanium microimplants and conventional molar anchorage.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty patients were selected with extraction of all first premolars and bonded with 0.022″ slot MBT system. After aligning and leveling, all subjects were placed with 0.019″ X 0.025″ posted SS wire with standardized torquing curve. The 20 subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups consisting of 10 each (Group A & Group B). Group A subjects, implants were placed and Group B formed the control group. Retraction was carried out using NiTi closed coil springs. The assessment of the vertical and torque control of incisors and tipping and vertical control of molars was done by radiographic method using lateral cephalogram taken before and after retraction.
RESULTS: The torque control of incisors, P11 value in group A and B indicated no significant difference. The molar tip, P12 value in group A indicated that there was distal tipping of molars while the P12 in group B indicated mesial tipping. On vertical plane P21, P22 and P23 values in Group A indicated that there was intrusion of incisors and molars while value in Group B indicated extrusion of incisors and molars.
CONCLUSION: Three dimensional control is better in the implant group compared to the non implant group. Therefore the implant group definitely has citied advantages over conventional method.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mini Screw Implant; Three-dimensional control; Torque control; Vertical control

Year:  2013        PMID: 24701541      PMCID: PMC3972570          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/7801.4066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  8 in total

1.  Sliding mechanics with microscrew implant anchorage.

Authors:  Hyo-Sang Park; Tae-Geon Kwon
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Clinical applications of the Miniscrew Anchorage System.

Authors:  Aldo Carano; Stefano Velo; Paola Leone; Giuseppe Siciliani
Journal:  J Clin Orthod       Date:  2005-01

3.  Microscrew implant anchorage sliding mechanics.

Authors:  Hyo-Sang Park; Oh-Won Kwon; Jae-Hyun Sung
Journal:  World J Orthod       Date:  2005

4.  Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  Hyo-Sang Park; Seong-Hwa Jeong; Oh-Won Kwon
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Root proximity and inclination of orthodontic mini-implants after placement: cone-beam computed tomography evaluation.

Authors:  Akihiko Shinohara; Mitsuru Motoyoshi; Yasuki Uchida; Noriyoshi Shimizu
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  Shouichi Miyawaki; Isao Koyama; Masahide Inoue; Katsuaki Mishima; Toshio Sugahara; Teruko Takano-Yamamoto
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  En masse retraction and two-step retraction of maxillary anterior teeth in adult Class I women. A comparison of anchorage loss.

Authors:  Wook Heo; Dong-Seok Nahm; Seung-Hak Baek
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in activator treatment.

Authors:  H Pancherz
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1984-02
  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  Reint Meursinge Reynders; Luisa Ladu
Journal:  Evid Based Dent       Date:  2017-10-27

2.  [Efficacy of vertical control by using mini-implant anchorage in maxillary posterior buccal area for Angle class Ⅱ extraction patients].

Authors:  W Liang; Y Tang; W B Huang; B Han; J X Lin
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2022-04-18

Review 3.  A Scoping Review about the Characteristics and Success-Failure Rates of Temporary Anchorage Devices in Orthodontics.

Authors:  Daniel Jaramillo-Bedoya; Gustavo Villegas-Giraldo; Andrés A Agudelo-Suárez; Diana Milena Ramírez-Ossa
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-06

Review 4.  Methods of Anterior Torque Control during Retraction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anna Ewa Kuc; Jacek Kotuła; Marek Nahajowski; Maciej Warnecki; Joanna Lis; Ellie Amm; Beata Kawala; Michał Sarul
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-01

Review 5.  Efficacy of orthodontic mini implants for en masse retraction in the maxilla: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kathrin Becker; Annika Pliska; Caroline Busch; Benedict Wilmes; Michael Wolf; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2018-10-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.