Literature DB >> 15523007

Acetabular reconstruction with impaction bone-grafting and a cemented cup in patients younger than fifty years old.

B Willem Schreurs1, Vincent J J F Busch, Marianne L Welten, Nico Verdonschot, Tom J J H Slooff, Jean W M Gardeniers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acetabular bone deficiency can present a challenge during total hip arthroplasty, especially in young patients. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of primary and revision acetabular reconstruction with use of an impaction bone-grafting technique and a cemented polyethylene cup in young patients who had preexisting acetabular bone deficiency.
METHODS: Forty-two consecutive acetabular reconstructions were performed in thirty-seven patients who were younger than fifty years old (average, 37.2 years old). The impaction bone-grafting technique was used for twenty-three primary and nineteen revision acetabular reconstructions. Twenty-eight patients (thirty-one hips) were available for review after a minimum duration of follow-up of fifteen years. Clinical and radiographic results were assessed, and survivorship analysis was performed with the Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: Eight hips were revised at a mean of twelve years (range, three to twenty-one years) after a primary reconstruction (four hips) or revision reconstruction (four hips). The revision was performed because of aseptic loosening of the acetabular component in four hips and because of culture-proven septic loosening in two. Two additional cups (both in hips that had had a revision reconstruction) were revised, during revision of the femoral stem, because of wear (one hip) or because of persistent intraoperative instability (one hip). Twenty-eight hips (in twenty-five patients) had retention of the acetabular component for a minimum of fifteen years. The mean Harris hip score for that group was 89 points. Twenty-six of these twenty-eight hips had no or slight pain. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a twenty-year survival rate of 80% (95% confidence interval, 67% to 94%) with acetabular revision for any reason as the end point and of 91% (95% confidence interval, 80% to 100%) with acetabular revision because of aseptic loosening as the end point.
CONCLUSIONS: Acetabular reconstruction with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polyethylene cup is a reliable and durable technique that is associated with good long-term results in young patients with acetabular bone-stock defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15523007     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200411000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  21 in total

1.  Acetabular revision surgery with impacted bone allografts and cemented cups in patients younger than 55 years.

Authors:  Fernando Comba; Martín Buttaro; Rodolfo Pusso; Francisco Piccaluga
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-02-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The value of bulk femoral head allograft in acetabular reconstruction using Kerboull-type plate.

Authors:  Daisuke Inoue; Tamon Kabata; Toru Maeda; Yoshitomo Kajino; Takashi Yamamoto; Tomoharu Takagi; Takaaki Oomori; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Standardized reconstruction of acetabular bone defects using the cranial socket system].

Authors:  Maximilian Rudert; Boris Michael Holzapfel; Florian Kratzer; Reiner Gradinger
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  Early results of whole femoral head allograft with articular cartilage for acetabular impaction grafting in revision hip replacements.

Authors:  Sivaraman Subramanian; Kaushik D Jain; Ramakutty Sreekumar; Una Fox; Mukesh Hemmady; John Hodgkinson
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Cemented polyethylene cups in patients younger than 40 years.

Authors:  Daniël C J de Kam; Jean W M Gardeniers; Jan C M Hendriks; René P H Veth; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-16       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Two-stage treatment of acetabular bone defect in tuberculosis of the hip by intended ankylosis followed by total hip arthroplasty: a case report.

Authors:  Els E Vogelpoel; Jurjen J Been; Arthur A de Gast
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-03-25

7.  Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty in young patients: diagnosis is more important than age.

Authors:  Eduardo Garcia-Rey; Ana Cruz-Pardos; Eduardo Garcia-Cimbrelo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Total hip arthroplasty revision in elderly people with cement and Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage.

Authors:  L Gaiani; R Bertelli; Massimo Palmonari; G Vicenzi
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2009-04-29

9.  Acetabular reconstruction using a free fibular autograft in total hip arthroplasty revisions.

Authors:  Thibaut Noailles; Chiaki Tanaka; Francois Lintz; Sylvie Collon; Kevin Bargoin; Francois Gouin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Impaction bone grafting of the acetabulum at hip revision using a mix of bone chips and a biphasic porous ceramic bone graft substitute.

Authors:  Ashley W Blom; Vikki Wylde; Christine Livesey; Michael R Whitehouse; Steve Eastaugh-Waring; Gordon C Bannister; Ian D Learmonth
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.