Literature DB >> 18264707

Acetabular revision surgery with impacted bone allografts and cemented cups in patients younger than 55 years.

Fernando Comba1, Martín Buttaro, Rodolfo Pusso, Francisco Piccaluga.   

Abstract

This article summarises a clinical and radiographical analysis of 30 acetabular revisions in patients younger than 55 years old, performed with impaction bone grafting and cemented cups. Preoperative Merle D'Aubigne and Postel functional score was an average 7 points. At a mean follow-up of 86.5 months (range 34-228) functional score averaged 16.3 points. Radiolucent lines with no clinical impact were observed in 7% of DeLee and Charnley acetabular zones evaluated. Massive radiological migration, consistent with clinical failure, was observed in two cups. Three patients underwent re-revision surgery (10%): two due to infection and one due to mechanical failure. Reconstruction survival rate was 89% (CI 95% 71.9-96.4) overall, and 96% (CI 95% 82.6-99.3) ruling out cases of infection. Impacted bone allograft constitutes one of the reconstructive techniques of choice in acetabular revision surgery of young patients. Restoration of bone stock is essential in this group of patients due to the possibility of future revisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18264707      PMCID: PMC2903100          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-007-0503-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  24 in total

1.  Migration of the acetabular component after revision with impacted morselized allografts: a radiostereometric 2-year follow-up analysis of 21 cases.

Authors:  E Ornstein; H Franzén; R Johnsson; P Sandquist; A Stefánsdóttir; M Sundberg
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1999-08

2.  Particle size of bone graft and method of impaction affect initial stability of cemented cups: human cadaveric and synthetic pelvic specimen studies.

Authors:  Stefan B T Bolder; B Willem Schreurs; Nico Verdonschot; Jacco M J van Unen; Jean W M Gardeniers; Tom J J H Slooff
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2003-12

3.  Acetabular revision with impacted morsellised cancellous bone grafting and a cemented cup. A 15- to 20-year follow-up.

Authors:  B W Schreurs; S B T Bolder; J W M Gardeniers; N Verdonschot; T J J H Slooff; R P H Veth
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-05

Review 4.  Impaction bone-grafting in revision joint replacement surgery.

Authors:  Andrew D Toms; Ross L Barker; Richard Spencer Jones; Jan Herman Kuiper
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Cementless acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Craig J Della Valle; Richard A Berger; Aaron G Rosenberg; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Acetabular revision with freeze-dried irradiated and chemically treated allograft: a minimum 5-year follow-up of 17 cases.

Authors:  Bernardo Vargas; Jacques Caton
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Survival and polyethylene wear of porous-coated acetabular components in patients less than fifty years old: results at nine to fourteen years.

Authors:  James D Crowther; Paul F Lachiewicz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Favorable results of acetabular reconstruction with impacted morsellized bone grafts in patients younger than 50 years: a 10- to 18-year follow-up study of 34 cemented total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  B W Schreurs; T G van Tienen; P Buma; N Verdonschot; J W Gardeniers; T J Slooff
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2001-04

9.  Acetabular revision after failed total hip arthroplasty in patients with congenital hip dislocation and dysplasia. Results after a mean of 8.6 years.

Authors:  J T Dearborn; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting and a cemented cup: 20 years' experience.

Authors:  B W Schreurs; T J Slooff; J W Gardeniers; P Buma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  12 in total

1.  The survival and fate of acetabular reconstruction with impaction grafting for large defects.

Authors:  Eduardo Garcia-Cimbrelo; Ana Cruz-Pardos; Eduardo Garcia-Rey; José Ortega-Chamarro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Method of fixation does not influence the overall risk of rerevision in first-time cup revisions.

Authors:  Maziar Mohaddes; Göran Garellick; Johan Kärrholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  The use of fibre-based demineralised bone matrix in major acetabular reconstruction: surgical technique and preliminary results.

Authors:  Moussa Hamadouche; Mathieu Karoubi; Valérie Dumaine; Jean Pierre Courpied
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-11-06       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Mid-term results of acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device.

Authors:  Junji Hori; Yuji Yasunaga; Takuma Yamasaki; Tomokazu Yoshida; Seigo Oshima; Keiichiro Yamasaki; Toshihiro Matsuo; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 5.  Uncemented Cups and Impaction Bone Grafting for Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Review of Rationale, Indications, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Rocco D'Apolito; Luigi Zagra
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.748

6.  Acetabular revision with metal mesh, impaction bone grafting, and a cemented cup.

Authors:  Martín A Buttaro; Fernando Comba; Rodolfo Pusso; Francisco Piccaluga
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  THA revisions using impaction allografting with mesh is durable for medial but not lateral acetabular defects.

Authors:  Eduardo García-Rey; Rosario Madero; Eduardo García-Cimbrelo
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  [Short- and mid-term effectiveness of impaction bone allograft with acetabular components in treatment of severe acetabular defects].

Authors:  Leilei Chen; Guoju Hong; Tianye Lin; Linfeng Huang; Qingwen Zhang; Wei He
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-03-15

9.  What Are the Long-term Results of Cemented Revision THA with Use of Both Acetabular and Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting in Patients Younger Than 55 Years?

Authors:  Jason Verspeek; Thijs A Nijenhuis; Martijn F L Kuijpers; Wim H C Rijnen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  Is the size of the acetabular bone lesion a predictive factor for failure in revisions of total hip arthroplasty using an impacted allograft?

Authors:  Rodrigo Pereira Guimarães; Alexandre Maris Yonamine; Carlos Eduardo Nunes Faria; Marco Rudelli
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2016-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.