Literature DB >> 18199888

No effect of recombination on the efficacy of natural selection in primates.

Kevin Bullaughey1, Molly Przeworski, Graham Coop.   

Abstract

Population genetic theory suggests that natural selection should be less effective in regions of low recombination, potentially leading to differences in rates of adaptation among recombination environments. To date, this prediction has mainly been tested in Drosophila, with somewhat conflicting results. We investigated the association between human recombination rates and adaptation in primates, by considering rates of protein evolution (measured by d(N)/d(S)) between human, chimpanzee, and rhesus macaque. We found no correlation between either broad- or fine-scale rates of recombination and rates of protein evolution, once GC content is taken into account. Moreover, genes in regions of very low recombination, which are expected to show the most pronounced reduction in the efficacy of selection, do not evolve at a different rate than other genes. Thus, there is no evidence for differences in the efficacy of selection across recombinational environments. An interesting implication is that indirect selection for recombination modifiers has probably been a weak force in primate evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18199888      PMCID: PMC2279242          DOI: 10.1101/gr.071548.107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  71 in total

1.  Compositional evolution of noncoding DNA in the human and chimpanzee genomes.

Authors:  Matthew T Webster; Nick G C Smith; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 2.  Evolution of synonymous codon usage in metazoans.

Authors:  Laurent Duret
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 5.578

3.  Weak selection revealed by the whole-genome comparison of the X chromosome and autosomes of human and chimpanzee.

Authors:  Jian Lu; Chung-I Wu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Chromosome organization and chromatin modification: influence on genome function and evolution.

Authors:  G P Holmquist; T Ashley
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.636

Review 5.  Focusing on comparative ape population genetics in the post-genomic age.

Authors:  Anne C Stone; Brian C Verrelli
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2006-09-28       Impact factor: 5.578

6.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Consequences of recombination rate variation on quantitative trait locus mapping studies. Simulations based on the Drosophila melanogaster genome.

Authors:  M A Noor; A L Cunningham; J C Larkin
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 8.  The genomic rate of adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 17.712

9.  Reduced efficacy of selection in regions of the Drosophila genome that lack crossing over.

Authors:  Penelope R Haddrill; Daniel L Halligan; Dimitris Tomaras; Brian Charlesworth
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Absence of the TAP2 human recombination hotspot in chimpanzees.

Authors:  Susan E Ptak; Amy D Roeder; Matthew Stephens; Yoav Gilad; Svante Pääbo; Molly Przeworski
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  25 in total

1.  Quantifying the variation in the effective population size within a genome.

Authors:  Toni I Gossmann; Megan Woolfit; Adam Eyre-Walker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Detecting positive selection within genomes: the problem of biased gene conversion.

Authors:  Abhirami Ratnakumar; Sylvain Mousset; Sylvain Glémin; Jonas Berglund; Nicolas Galtier; Laurent Duret; Matthew T Webster
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Mutation and the evolution of recombination.

Authors:  N H Barton
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Comparative genomics based on massive parallel transcriptome sequencing reveals patterns of substitution and selection across 10 bird species.

Authors:  Axel Künstner; Jochen B W Wolf; Niclas Backström; Osceola Whitney; Christopher N Balakrishnan; Lainy Day; Scott V Edwards; Daniel E Janes; Barney A Schlinger; Richard K Wilson; Erich D Jarvis; Wesley C Warren; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 6.185

Review 5.  Weak selection and protein evolution.

Authors:  Hiroshi Akashi; Naoki Osada; Tomoko Ohta
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Contrasting methods of quantifying fine structure of human recombination.

Authors:  Andrew G Clark; Xu Wang; Tara Matise
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 8.929

7.  Protein rates of evolution are predicted by double-strand break events, independent of crossing-over rates.

Authors:  Claudia C Weber; Laurence D Hurst
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 8.  Genomic signatures of selection at linked sites: unifying the disparity among species.

Authors:  Asher D Cutter; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-03-12       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  An empirical test for branch-specific positive selection.

Authors:  Gabrielle C Nickel; David L Tefft; Karrie Goglin; Mark D Adams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Genetic Effect of Chemotherapy Exposure in Children of Testicular Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Gregory V Kryukov; Craig M Bielski; Kaitlin Samocha; Menachem Fromer; Sara Seepo; Carleen Gentry; Benjamin Neale; Levi A Garraway; Christopher J Sweeney; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Eliezer M Van Allen
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.