Literature DB >> 15507951

Comparison of maternal mortality and morbidity between trial of labor and elective cesarean section among women with previous cesarean delivery.

Shi Wu Wen1, I D Rusen, Mark Walker, Robert Liston, Michael S Kramer, Tom Baskett, Maureen Heaman, Shiliang Liu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess the safety of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of 308,755 Canadian women with previous cesarean delivery between 1988 and 2000. Occurrences of in-hospital maternal death, uterine rupture, and other severe maternal morbidity were compared between women with a trial of labor and those with an elective cesarean section.
RESULTS: Rates of uterine rupture (0.65%), transfusion (0.19%), and hysterectomy (0.10%) were significantly higher in the trial-of-labor group. Maternal in-hospital death rate, however, was lower in the trial-of-labor group (1.6 per 100,000) than in the elective cesarean section group (5.6 per 100,000). The association between trial of labor and uterine rupture was stronger in low volume (<500) than in high volume (> or =500 births per year) obstetric units.
CONCLUSION: Trial of labor is associated with increased risk of uterine rupture, but elective cesarean section may increase the risk of maternal death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15507951     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  27 in total

1.  An analysis of antenatal hospitalization in Canada, 1991-2003.

Authors:  Shiliang Liu; Maureen Heaman; Reg Sauve; Robert Liston; Francesca Reyes; Sharon Bartholomew; David Young; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2006-11-07

2.  Patient-choice vaginal delivery?

Authors:  Lawrence M Leeman; Lauren A Plante
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

3.  Rates and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990-2009.

Authors:  Sayeedha F G Uddin; Alan E Simon
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-09

4.  The Association between Hospital Frequency of Labor after Cesarean and Outcomes in California.

Authors:  Mekhala V Dissanayake; Marit L Bovbjerg; Ellen L Tilden; Jonathan M Snowden
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2020-08-25

5.  Use of Intracervical Foley Catheter for Induction of Labour in Cases of Previous Caesarean Section: Experience of a single tertiary centre in Oman.

Authors:  Hazel Gonsalves; Nihal Al-Riyami; Tamima Al-Dughaishi; Vaidayanathan Gowri; Mohammed Al-Azri; Ayesha Salahuddin
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2016-11-30

6.  Cesarean delivery rates among family physicians versus obstetricians: a population-based cohort study using instrumental variable methods.

Authors:  Russell Eric Dawe; Jessica Bishop; Amanda Pendergast; Susan Avery; Kelly Monaghan; Norah Duggan; Kris Aubrey-Bassler
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2017-12-11

7.  Delivery after prior cesarean: maternal morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Yvonne W Cheng; Karen B Eden; Nicole Marshall; Leonardo Pereira; Aaron B Caughey; Jeanne-Marie Guise
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.430

8.  Maternal and newborn outcomes after a prior cesarean birth by planned mode of delivery and history of prior vaginal birth in British Columbia: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Celeste D Bickford; Patricia A Janssen
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02

9.  Outcomes of deliveries by family physicians or obstetricians: a population-based cohort study using an instrumental variable.

Authors:  Kris Aubrey-Bassler; Richard M Cullen; Alvin Simms; Shabnam Asghari; Joan Crane; Peizhong Peter Wang; Marshall Godwin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Effect of hospital volume on maternal outcomes in women with prior cesarean delivery undergoing trial of labor.

Authors:  Jen Jen Chang; David M Stamilio; George A Macones
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.