Literature DB >> 17089198

An analysis of antenatal hospitalization in Canada, 1991-2003.

Shiliang Liu1, Maureen Heaman, Reg Sauve, Robert Liston, Francesca Reyes, Sharon Bartholomew, David Young, Michael S Kramer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the incidence and temporal trends of hospitalization during pregnancy, and provide additional information on maternal morbidity among Canadian women.
METHODS: A population-based cohort study was conducted using the Canadian Institute for Health Information's Discharge Abstract Database between fiscal year 1991/92 and 2002/03. This database included antenatal hospitalizations for all hospital deliveries (N=3,103,365) in Canada except for those occurring in Manitoba and Quebec. Temporal trends, and variations in the non-delivery antenatal hospitalization ratio (per 100 deliveries) by maternal age and province or territory were quantified. Primary causes for antenatal hospitalization, the lengths of in-hospital stay, and changing pattern by maternal age and time period were compared.
RESULTS: The overall antenatal hospitalization ratio declined by 43%, from 24.0 per 100 deliveries in 1991/92 to 13.6 in 2002/03. Younger women tended to be hospitalized more frequently than older women: 27.1 per 100 deliveries for women aged less than 20 years and 21.5 per 100 deliveries for 20-24 years, respectively, compared to 11.5 per 100 for women aged 35-39 years. The antenatal hospitalization ratio varied greatly by province/territory--from 12.2 per 100 deliveries in Ontario to 30.7 in the Yukon. Threatened preterm labour, antenatal hemorrhage, hypertensive disorders, severe vomiting and diabetes remained the five most common causes for antenatal hospitalization, although the trends for the first four declined dramatically from 1991/92 to 2002/03. Younger women were more likely to be admitted for threatened preterm labour and severe vomiting, while older women were more likely to be admitted for antenatal hemorrhage and hypertensive disorders.
CONCLUSIONS: The decline in antenatal hospitalization may reflect changes in management of pregnancy complications, e.g., transition from in-hospital care to out-of-hospital care, and introduction of antepartum home care programs. Information on interprovincial/territorial variations in antenatal hospitalization may be helpful in directing future maternal health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17089198     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-006-0154-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  32 in total

1.  Hospital admissions during pregnancy in two urban areas of Ukraine.

Authors:  R E Little; A S Little; N Chislovska; O P Hulchiy; S C Monaghan; B C Gladen
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.980

2.  Pregnancy-associated hospitalizations in the United States, 1999-2000.

Authors:  Stephen J Bacak; William M Callaghan; Patricia M Dietz; Chadd Crouse
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Antenatal hospitalisations in New South Wales, 1995-96.

Authors:  P L Adelson; A G Child; W B Giles; D J Henderson-Smart
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 7.738

4.  Preterm premature rupture of membranes: a randomized study of home versus hospital management.

Authors:  S J Carlan; W F O'Brien; M T Parsons; J J Lense
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Risk of maternal postpartum readmission associated with mode of delivery.

Authors:  Shiliang Liu; Maureen Heaman; K S Joseph; Robert M Liston; Ling Huang; Reg Sauve; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Hospitalizations for severe complications of pregnancy, 1987-1992.

Authors:  C L Scott; G F Chavez; H K Atrash; D J Taylor; R S Shah; D Rowley
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  In-home nursing care for women with high-risk pregnancies: outcomes and cost.

Authors:  M J Harrison; K E Kushner; K Benzies; C Kimak; P Jacobs; B F Mitchell
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Placenta previa: antepartum conservative management, inpatient versus outpatient.

Authors:  J R Mouer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Expectant management of placenta previa: cost-benefit analysis of outpatient treatment.

Authors:  S Droste; K Keil
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Randomised controlled trial of day care for hypertension in pregnancy.

Authors:  D J Tuffnell; R J Lilford; P C Buchan; V M Prendiville; A J Tuffnell; M P Holgate; M D Jones
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-01-25       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  9 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of 2-D versus 3-D ultrasound estimation of the fetal adrenal gland volume and prediction of preterm birth.

Authors:  Ozhan M Turan; Sifa Turan; Irina A Buhimschi; Edmund F Funai; Katherine H Campbell; Ozan M Bahtiyar; Chris R Harman; Joshua A Copel; Ahmet A Baschat; Catalin S Buhimschi
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Maternal plasma concentrations of angiogenic/anti-angiogenic factors are of prognostic value in patients presenting to the obstetrical triage area with the suspicion of preeclampsia.

Authors:  Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Roberto Romero; Zeynep Alpay Savasan; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Giovanna Ogge; Eleazar Soto; Zhong Dong; Adi Tarca; Bhatti Gaurav; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2011-08-09

3.  Factors associated with tocolytic hospitalizations in Taiwan: evidence from a population-based and longitudinal study from 1997 to 2004.

Authors:  Ke-Zong Michelle Ma; Edward C Norton; Eing-Mei Tsai; Shoou-Yih Daniel Lee
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Plasma concentrations of angiogenic/anti-angiogenic factors have prognostic value in women presenting with suspected preeclampsia to the obstetrical triage area: a prospective study.

Authors:  Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Roberto Romero; Steven J Korzeniewski; Josef M Cortez; Athina Pappas; Adi L Tarca; Piya Chaemsaithong; Zhong Dong; Lami Yeo; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2013-08-08

Review 5.  Antenatal day care units versus hospital admission for women with complicated pregnancy.

Authors:  Therese Dowswell; Philippa Middleton; Andrew Weeks
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-10-07

Review 6.  Framing maternal morbidity: WHO scoping exercise.

Authors:  Rachel C Vanderkruik; Özge Tunçalp; Doris Chou; Lale Say
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Changing prevalence and the risk factors for antenatal obstetric hospitalizations in Denmark 2003-2012.

Authors:  Jane Bendix; Hanne Kristine Hegaard; Jens Langhoff-Roos; Thomas Bergholt
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 4.790

8.  Outcomes of Admissions for Preterm Labor.

Authors:  Michael W Kuzniewicz; Libby Black; Eileen M Walsh; Sherian X Li; Mara Greenberg
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2017-06-22

9.  Maternal near miss and death among women with severe hypertensive disorders: a Brazilian multicenter surveillance study.

Authors:  Elvira Zanette; Mary Angela Parpinelli; Fernanda Garanhani Surita; Maria Laura Costa; Samira Maerrawi Haddad; Maria Helena Sousa; Joao Luiz Pinto E Silva; Joao Paulo Souza; Jose Guilherme Cecatti
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.223

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.