Literature DB >> 16735530

Patient-choice vaginal delivery?

Lawrence M Leeman1, Lauren A Plante.   

Abstract

Patient-choice cesarean delivery is increasing in the United States. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists supports this option, citing ethical premises of autonomy and informed consent, despite a lack of evidence for its safety. This increase in patient-choice cesarean delivery occurs during a time when women with a breech-presenting fetus or a previous cesarean section have fewer choices as to vaginal birth. Patient-choice cesarean delivery may become widely disseminated before the potential risks to women and their children have been well analyzed. The growing pressure for cesarean delivery in the absence of a medical indication may ultimately result in a decrease of women's childbirth options. Advocacy of patient-choice requires preserving vaginal birth options as well as cesarean delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16735530      PMCID: PMC1479446          DOI: 10.1370/afm.537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Fam Med        ISSN: 1544-1709            Impact factor:   5.166


  25 in total

1.  Mode of delivery and risk of respiratory diseases in newborns.

Authors:  E M Levine; V Ghai; J J Barton; C M Strom
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Elective primary cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Howard Minkoff; Frank A Chervenak
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The laborist: a new focus of practice for the obstetrician.

Authors:  Louis Weinstein
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  The prophylactic forceps operation. 1920.

Authors:  Steven G Gabbe; Joseph B DeLee
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  ACOG Committee Opinion. Surgery and patient choice: the ethics of decision making.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  ACOG committee opinion: number 265, December 2001. Mode of term single breech delivery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 7.  Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor.

Authors:  S B Thacker; D Stroup; M Chang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2001

8.  Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group.

Authors:  M E Hannah; W J Hannah; S A Hewson; E D Hodnett; S Saigal; A R Willan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-10-21       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Breech vaginal delivery at or near term.

Authors:  Modupe O Tunde-Byass; Mary E Hannah
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.300

10.  Cesarean delivery on demand: what will it cost?

Authors:  Brent W Bost
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  3 in total

1.  On TRACK: medical research must consider context and complexity.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

2.  The association between antenatal anxiety and fear of childbirth in nulliparous women: a prospective study.

Authors:  Zahra Alipour; Minoor Lamyian; Ebrahim Hajizadeh; Maryam Agular Vafaei
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2011

Review 3.  Is it the decision of women to choose a cesarean section as the mode of birth? A review of literature on the views of stakeholders.

Authors:  Alice Yuen Loke; Louise Davies; Yim-Wah Mak
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.