Literature DB >> 15506498

Predicting hearing aid microphone preference in everyday listening.

Brian E Walden1, Rauna K Surr, Mary T Cord, Ole Dyrlund.   

Abstract

Seventeen hearing-impaired adults were fit with omnidirectional/directional hearing aids, which they wore during a four-week trial. For each listening situation encountered in daily living during a total of seven days, participants selected the preferred microphone mode and described the listening situation in terms of five environmental variables, using a paper and pencil form. Results indicated that hearing-impaired adults typically spend the majority of their active listening time in situations with background noise present and surrounding the listener, and the signal source located in front and relatively near. Microphone preferences were fairly evenly distributed across listening situations but differed depending on the characteristics of the listening environment. The omnidirectional mode tended to be preferred in relatively quiet listening situations or, in the presence of background noise, when the signal source was relatively far away. The directional mode tended to be preferred when background noise was present and the signal source was located in front of and relatively near the listener. Results suggest that knowing only signal location and distance and whether background noise is present or absent, omnidirectional/directional hearing aids can be set in the preferred mode in most everyday listening situations. These findings have relevance for counseling patients when to set manually switchable omnidirectional/directional hearing aids in each microphone mode, as well as for the development of automatic algorithms for selecting omnidirectional versus directional microphone processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15506498     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.15.5.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  19 in total

1.  Dispensing rates of four common hearing aid product features: associations with variations in practice among audiologists.

Authors:  Earl E Johnson; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-05-10

Review 2.  Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part I. Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies and noise reduction algorithms.

Authors:  King Chung
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

Review 3.  Adult aural rehabilitation: what is it and does it work?

Authors:  Arthur Boothroyd
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-06

4.  A low-noise differential microphone inspired by the ears of the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea.

Authors:  R N Miles; Q Su; W Cui; M Shetye; F L Degertekin; B Bicen; C Garcia; S Jones; N Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Development and efficacy of a frequent-word auditory training protocol for older adults with impaired hearing.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Matthew H Burk; Lauren E Strauser; Dana L Kinney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Octav Chipara; Syed Shabih Hasan; Anne Welhaven; Jacob Oleson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  The EarLens system: new sound transduction methods.

Authors:  Rodney Perkins; Jonathan P Fay; Paul Rucker; Micha Rosen; Lisa Olson; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Smartphone-Based System for Learning and Inferring Hearing Aid Settings.

Authors:  Gabriel Aldaz; Sunil Puria; Larry J Leifer
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  Rerouting Hearing Aid Systems for Overcoming Simulated Unilateral Hearing in Dynamic Listening Situations.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Dawna Lewis; Gina Angley; Anne Marie Tharpe
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Construct Validity of the Ecological Momentary Assessment in Audiology Research.

Authors:  Yu-Hsiang Wu; Elizabeth Stangl; Xuyang Zhang; Ruth A Bentler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.664

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.