Literature DB >> 19354377

A low-noise differential microphone inspired by the ears of the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea.

R N Miles1, Q Su, W Cui, M Shetye, F L Degertekin, B Bicen, C Garcia, S Jones, N Hall.   

Abstract

A miniature differential microphone is described having a low-noise floor. The sensitivity of a differential microphone suffers as the distance between the two pressure sensing locations decreases, resulting in an increase in the input sound pressure-referred noise floor. In the microphone described here, both the diaphragm thermal noise and the electronic noise are minimized by a combination of novel diaphragm design and the use of low-noise optical sensing that has been integrated into the microphone package. The differential microphone diaphragm measures 1 x 2 mm(2) and is fabricated out of polycrystalline silicon. The diaphragm design is based on the coupled directionally sensitive ears of the fly Ormia ochracea. The sound pressure input-referred noise floor of this miniature differential microphone has been measured to be less than 36 dBA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19354377      PMCID: PMC2677264          DOI: 10.1121/1.3082118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  15 in total

1.  Noise in miniature microphones.

Authors:  Stephen C Thompson; Janice L LoPresti; Eugene M Ring; Henry G Nepomuceno; John J Beard; William J Ballad; Elmer V Carlson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Modeling of viscous damping of perforated planar microstructures. Applications in acoustics.

Authors:  Dorel Homentcovschi; Ronald N Miles
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  The development of a biologically-inspired directional microphone for hearing aids.

Authors:  R N Miles; R R Hoy
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-01-17       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Micromachined optical microphone structures with low thermal-mechanical noise levels.

Authors:  Neal A Hall; Murat Okandan; Robert Littrell; Baris Bicen; F Levent Degertekin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Viscous damping of perforated planar micromechanical structures.

Authors:  D Homentcovschi; R N Miles
Journal:  Sens Actuators A Phys       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.407

7.  Localization of multiple acoustic sources with small arrays using a coherence test.

Authors:  Satish Mohan; Michael E Lockwood; Michael L Kramer; Douglas L Jones
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Mechanically coupled ears for directional hearing in the parasitoid fly Ormia ochracea.

Authors:  R N Miles; D Robert; R R Hoy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Improving speech intelligibility in background noise with an adaptive directional microphone.

Authors:  Peter J Blamey; Hayley J Fiket; Brenton R Steele
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.

Authors:  Todd Ricketts; Paula Henry; David Gnewikow
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  11 in total

1.  A transmission-line model of back-cavity dynamics for in-plane pressure-differential microphones.

Authors:  Donghwan Kim; Michael L Kuntzman; Neal A Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Micromachined piezoelectric microphones with in-plane directivity.

Authors:  Michael L Kuntzman; Jia Gloria Lee; Nishshanka N Hewa-Kasakarage; Donghwan Kim; Neal A Hall
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Animals and ICE: meaning, origin, and diversity.

Authors:  J Leo van Hemmen; Jakob Christensen-Dalsgaard; Catherine E Carr; Peter M Narins
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Micropower Mixed-signal VLSI Independent Component Analysis for Gradient Flow Acoustic Source Separation.

Authors:  Milutin Stanaćević; Shuo Li; Gert Cauwenberghs
Journal:  IEEE Trans Circuits Syst I Regul Pap       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.605

5.  An mm-sized biomimetic directional microphone array for sound source localization in three dimensions.

Authors:  Ashiqur Rahaman; Byungki Kim
Journal:  Microsyst Nanoeng       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 8.006

6.  Sound source localization by Ormia ochracea inspired low-noise piezoelectric MEMS directional microphone.

Authors:  Ashiqur Rahaman; Byungki Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A Biomimetic Miniaturized Microphone Array for Sound Direction Finding Applications Based on a Phase-Enhanced Electrical Coupling Network.

Authors:  Chien-Chang Huang; Chien-Hao Liu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Mathematical Analysis and Micro-Spacing Implementation of Acoustic Sensor Based on Bio-Inspired Intermembrane Bridge Structure.

Authors:  Xiang Shen; Liye Zhao; Jiawen Xu; Xuwei Yao
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Understanding and mimicking the dual optimality of the fly ear.

Authors:  Haijun Liu; Luke Currano; Danny Gee; Tristan Helms; Miao Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Bio-Inspired Miniature Direction Finding Acoustic Sensor.

Authors:  Daniel Wilmott; Fabio Alves; Gamani Karunasiri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.