Literature DB >> 15506497

Relationship between laboratory measures of directional advantage and everyday success with directional microphone hearing aids.

Mary T Cord1, Rauna K Surr, Brian E Walden, Ole Dyrlund.   

Abstract

The improvement in speech recognition in noise obtained with directional microphones compared to omnidirectional microphones is referred to as the directional advantage. Laboratory studies have revealed substantial differences in the magnitude of the directional advantage across hearing-impaired listeners. This investigation examined whether persons who were successful users of directional microphone hearing aids in everyday living tended to obtain a larger directional advantage in the test booth than persons who were unsuccessful users. Results revealed that the mean directional advantage did not differ significantly between patients who used the directional mode regularly and those who reported little or no benefit from directional microphones in daily living and, therefore, tended to leave their hearing aids set in the default omnidirectional mode. Success with directional microphone hearing aids in everyday living, therefore, cannot be reliably predicted by the magnitude of the directional advantage obtained in the clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15506497     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.15.5.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  21 in total

1.  Dispensing rates of four common hearing aid product features: associations with variations in practice among audiologists.

Authors:  Earl E Johnson; Todd A Ricketts
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2010-05-10

Review 2.  Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids. Part I. Speech understanding in noise, microphone technologies and noise reduction algorithms.

Authors:  King Chung
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2004

3.  Development and efficacy of a frequent-word auditory training protocol for older adults with impaired hearing.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Matthew H Burk; Lauren E Strauser; Dana L Kinney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  [A sound reproduction system using wave field synthesis to simulate everyday listening conditions].

Authors:  T Weißgerber
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  An examination of speech reception thresholds measured in a simulated reverberant cafeteria environment.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Gitte Keidser; Jörg M Buchholz; Katrina Freeston
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  An evaluation of the performance of two binaural beamformers in complex and dynamic multitalker environments.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Jorge Mejia; Katrina Freeston; Richard J van Hoesel; Harvey Dillon
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  The EarLens system: new sound transduction methods.

Authors:  Rodney Perkins; Jonathan P Fay; Paul Rucker; Micha Rosen; Lisa Olson; Sunil Puria
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Impact of advanced hearing aid technology on speech understanding for older listeners with mild to moderate, adult-onset, sensorineural hearing loss.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Jani A Johnson; Jingjing Xu
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.140

9.  Smartphone-Based System for Learning and Inferring Hearing Aid Settings.

Authors:  Gabriel Aldaz; Sunil Puria; Larry J Leifer
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Benefit From Directional Microphone Hearing Aids: Objective and Subjective Evaluations.

Authors:  Hee-Sung Park; Il Joon Moon; Sun Hwa Jin; Ji Eun Choi; Yang-Sun Cho; Sung Hwa Hong
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.372

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.