Literature DB >> 30859252

[A sound reproduction system using wave field synthesis to simulate everyday listening conditions].

T Weißgerber1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Test procedures used in clinical routine are often not sufficiently accurate to evaluate the auditory benefit of hearing systems and the improvements brought by new signal preprocessing algorithms.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to realize and evaluate a sound reproduction system for simulation of everyday listening conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sound reproduction system was developed using 128 loudspeakers. By appropriate superposition of the loudspeaker signals (so-called wave field synthesis), it is possible to create almost arbitrary everyday listening conditions in a reproducible laboratory setting. Auditory scenes can be changed in real time. The sound reproduction system was mechanically evaluated by measuring the sound field with a microphone array. To validate the system, speech reception thresholds (SRT) were measured in bilateral cochlear implant (CI) users in moving and diffuse noise conditions. Furthermore, the impact of different types of directional microphones on speech perception was assessed.
RESULTS: With a moving noise source in the dorsal half-space, CI users showed significant SRT improvements by using directional microphones with higher directional sensitivity (2.5 dB improvement) as well as with adaptive directional sensitivity (8.5 dB). The benefit of adaptive directional microphones is reduced in environments with diffuse noise.
CONCLUSION: Wave field synthesis is a useful tool to simulate everyday listening conditions in a reproducible laboratory environment. This technique can complement established clinical methods to assess the benefit of a hearing device fitting or of signal preprocessing algorithms in dynamic listening conditions.

Keywords:  Cochlear implant; Hearing loss; Noise; Speech perception; Virtual acoustics

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30859252     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-019-0635-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  21 in total

1.  Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system.

Authors:  A E Vandali; L A Whitford; K L Plant; G M Clark
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Influence of automatic gain control parameter settings on speech understanding of cochlear implant users employing the continuous interleaved sampling strategy.

Authors:  B Stöbich; C M Zierhofer; E S Hochmair
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Adaptive dynamic range optimization for cochlear implants: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Chris J James; Peter J Blamey; Lois Martin; Brett Swanson; Yvette Just; David Macfarlane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  [Speech audiometry and new word-tests].

Authors:  K H HAHLBROCK
Journal:  Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd       Date:  1953

5.  Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.

Authors:  Ann Spriet; Lieselot Van Deun; Kyriaky Eftaxiadis; Johan Laneau; Marc Moonen; Bas van Dijk; Astrid van Wieringen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Hearing preservation after complete cochlear coverage in cochlear implantation with the free-fitting FLEXSOFT electrode carrier.

Authors:  Silke Helbig; Uwe Baumann; Constanze Hey; Matthias Helbig
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Relationship between laboratory measures of directional advantage and everyday success with directional microphone hearing aids.

Authors:  Mary T Cord; Rauna K Surr; Brian E Walden; Ole Dyrlund
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.664

8.  Speech perception for adult cochlear implant recipients in a realistic background noise: effectiveness of preprocessing strategies and external options for improving speech recognition in noise.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Lawrence J Revit
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.664

9.  The combined effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Philipos C Loizou
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 2.117

Review 10.  A system to simulate and reproduce audio-visual environments for spatial hearing research.

Authors:  Bernhard U Seeber; Stefan Kerber; Ervin R Hafter
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  1 in total

1.  Improved binaural speech reception thresholds through small symmetrical separation of speech and noise.

Authors:  Luise Wagner; Lukas Geiling; Christopher Hauth; Thomas Hocke; Stefan Plontke; Torsten Rahne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.