Literature DB >> 15490135

Visual, haptic and crossmodal recognition of scenes.

Fiona N Newell1, Andrew T Woods, Marion Mernagh, Heinrich H Bülthoff.   

Abstract

Real-world scene perception can often involve more than one sensory modality. Here we investigated the visual, haptic and crossmodal recognition of scenes of familiar objects. In three experiments participants first learned a scene of objects arranged in random positions on a platform. After learning, the experimenter swapped the position of two objects in the scene and the task for the participant was to identify the two swapped objects. In experiment 1, we found a cost in scene recognition performance when there was a change in sensory modality and scene orientation between learning and test. The cost in crossmodal performance was not due to the participants verbally encoding the objects (experiment 2) or by differences between serial and parallel encoding of the objects during haptic and visual learning, respectively (experiment 3). Instead, our findings suggest that differences between visual and haptic representations of space may affect the recognition of scenes of objects across these modalities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15490135     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-004-2067-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  34 in total

1.  Role of memorization conditions in the haptic processing of orientations and the 'oblique effect'.

Authors:  E Gentaz; Y Hatwell
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1999-08

2.  Path completion after haptic exploration without vision: implications for haptic spatial representations.

Authors:  R L Klatzky
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-02

3.  Change detection.

Authors:  Ronald A Rensink
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

4.  Viewpoint-dependent recognition of scenes.

Authors:  Chie Nakatani; Alexander Pollatsek; Scott H Johnson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2002-01

5.  Active and passive scene recognition across views.

Authors:  R F Wang; D J Simons
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-03-01

6.  Delay improves performance on a haptic spatial matching task.

Authors:  Sander Zuidhoek; Astrid M L Kappers; Rob H J van der Lubbe; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Similarity of tactual and visual picture recognition with limited field of view.

Authors:  J M Loomis; R L Klatzky; S J Lederman
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Spatial and movement-based heuristics for encoding pattern information through touch.

Authors:  S J Lederman; R L Klatzky; P O Barber
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1985-03

9.  Absence of the horizontal-vertical illusion in haptic space.

Authors:  R H Day; G C Avery
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1970-01

10.  The kinaesthetic perception of Euclidean distance: a study of the detour effect.

Authors:  Henry Faineteau; Edouard Gentaz; Paolo Viviani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  20 in total

1.  The effect of temporal delay and spatial differences on cross-modal object recognition.

Authors:  Andrew T Woods; Sile O'Modhrain; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Time gain influences adaptive visual-motor isometric force control.

Authors:  Xiaogang Hu; Molly M Mazich; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual, haptic and bimodal scene perception: evidence for a unitary representation.

Authors:  Helene Intraub; Frank Morelli; Kristin M Gagnier
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2015-02-25

4.  Visual and haptic representations of scenes are updated with observer movement.

Authors:  Achille Pasqualotto; Ciara M Finucane; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Modality-independent coding of spatial layout in the human brain.

Authors:  Thomas Wolbers; Roberta L Klatzky; Jack M Loomis; Magdalena G Wutte; Nicholas A Giudice
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Functional equivalence of spatial images from touch and vision: evidence from spatial updating in blind and sighted individuals.

Authors:  Nicholas A Giudice; Maryann R Betty; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Orientation dependence of spatial memory acquired from auditory experience.

Authors:  Naohide Yamamoto; Amy L Shelton
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-04

8.  Perceptual learning of view-independence in visuo-haptic object representations.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; Marisa Pappas; Alexandra Kreps; Kevin Lee; K Sathian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The effect of visuo-haptic congruency on haptic spatial matching.

Authors:  Amanda L Kaas; Hanneke I van Mier; Johan Lataster; Mirella Fingal; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  A multisensory approach to spatial updating: the case of mental rotations.

Authors:  Manuel Vidal; Alexandre Lehmann; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.