Literature DB >> 15460932

The effect of temporal delay and spatial differences on cross-modal object recognition.

Andrew T Woods1, Sile O'Modhrain, Fiona N Newell.   

Abstract

In a series of experiments, we investigated the matching of objects across visual and haptic modalities across different time delays and spatial dimensions. In all of the experiments, we used simple L-shaped figures as stimuli that varied in either the x or the y dimension or in both dimensions. In Experiment 1, we found that cross-modal matching performance decreased as a function of the time delay between the presentation of the objects. We found no difference in performance between the visual-haptic (VH) and haptic-visual (HV) conditions. Cross-modal performance was better when objects differed in both the x and y dimensions rather than in one dimension alone. In Experiment 2, we investigated the relative contribution of each modality to performance across different interstimulus delays. We found no differential effect of delay between the HH and VV conditions, although general performance was better for the VV condition than for the HH condition. Again, responses to xy changes were better than changes in the x or y dimensions alone. Finally, in Experiment 3, we examined performance in a matching task with simultaneous and successive presentation conditions. We failed to find any difference between simultaneous and successive presentation conditions. Our findings suggest that the short-term retention of object representations is similar in both the visual and haptic modalities. Moreover, these results suggest that recognition is best within a temporal window that includes simultaneous or rapidly successive presentation of stimuli across the modalities and is also best when objects are more discriminable from each other.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15460932     DOI: 10.3758/cabn.4.2.260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  21 in total

1.  Recognition memory for tactile sequences.

Authors:  Paul Mahrer; Christopher Miles
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2002-01

2.  Convergence of visual and tactile shape processing in the human lateral occipital complex.

Authors:  Amir Amedi; Gilad Jacobson; Talma Hendler; Rafael Malach; Ehud Zohary
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  DMDX: a windows display program with millisecond accuracy.

Authors:  Kenneth I Forster; Jonathan C Forster
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  2003-02

4.  Observations on active touch.

Authors:  J J GIBSON
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1962-11       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  External and body-centered frames of reference in spatial memory: evidence from touch.

Authors:  Susanna Millar; Zainab Al-Attar
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-01

6.  Stimulus context and view dependence in object recognition.

Authors:  F N Newell
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Short-term retention of tactile stimulation.

Authors:  E V Sullivan; M T Turvey
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Tactile short-term memory.

Authors:  E Q Gilson; A D Baddeley
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Active and passive touch: the influence of exploration time on form recognition.

Authors:  M A Heller
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1984-04

10.  Vertical and bisection bias in active touch.

Authors:  S Millar; Z al-Attar
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.490

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Tactual perception: a review of experimental variables and procedures.

Authors:  Alexandra M Fernandes; Pedro B Albuquerque
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-06-06

2.  Haptic spatial matching in near peripersonal space.

Authors:  Amanda L Kaas; Hanneke I van Mier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Memory for curvature of objects: haptic touch vs. vision.

Authors:  Miriam Ittyerah; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2007-11

4.  Intramodal and cross-modal discrimination of curvature: Haptic touch versus vision.

Authors:  Miriam Ittyerah; Lawrence E Marks
Journal:  Curr Psychol Lett       Date:  2008

5.  Visual, haptic and crossmodal recognition of scenes.

Authors:  Fiona N Newell; Andrew T Woods; Marion Mernagh; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The effect of visuo-haptic congruency on haptic spatial matching.

Authors:  Amanda L Kaas; Hanneke I van Mier; Johan Lataster; Mirella Fingal; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The Recognition of Solid Object Shape: The Importance of Inhomogeneity.

Authors:  J Farley Norman; Sydney P Wheeler; Lauren E Pedersen; Lindsey M Shain; Jonathan D Kinnard; Joel Lenoir
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2019-08-13

Review 8.  Visuo-haptic multisensory object recognition, categorization, and representation.

Authors:  Simon Lacey; K Sathian
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-17

9.  Temporal persistence of after-effects in the n-1 replication task.

Authors:  Oliver Simon Sack; Christine Sutter
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.199

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.