Literature DB >> 15482556

Trends in the use of feeding tubes in North Carolina hospitals.

Carmen L Lewis1, Christopher E Cox, Joanne M Garrett, Laura Hanson, George M Holmes, Ann Howard, Timothy S Carey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: National data describing the placement of feeding tubes demonstrated a rapid increase in use in the early and mid-1990s. In the past several years, substantial concerns have arisen regarding the appropriateness of the procedure in many chronically ill patients. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of feeding tubes has continued to increase through the 1990s despite these widely publicized concerns.
DESIGN: Repeated measure cross-sectional study of the North Carolina Discharge Database.
SETTING: Analyses of all nonfederal hospital inpatient admissions in North Carolina.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We examined the absolute numbers and rates of feeding tube placements from 1989 to 2000. The rate of feeding tube placement increased from 59/100,000 persons in 1989 to 94/100,000 persons in 2000, an overall 60% increase with slowing in the rate of increase in the late 1990s. However, when outpatient procedures were included, the increase in tube feeding continued throughout the 11-year period of observation. The increase was due to an increase in utilization within all hospitals over the time period. Utilization did not differ between profit and not for profit hospitals. The relative growth rate of inpatient feeding tube placement did not differ by age group but the absolute increase was greatest in those age 75 years and over.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the use of feeding tubes has continued to increase through the 1990s. This increase occurred despite ongoing controversy in the medical literature about feeding tube placement in chronically ill patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15482556      PMCID: PMC1492585          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30071.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  21 in total

1.  The adequacy of informed consent for placement of gastrostomy tubes.

Authors:  A S Brett; J C Rosenberg
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-03-12

2.  Survival analysis in percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding: a worse outcome in patients with dementia.

Authors:  D S Sanders; M J Carter; J D'Silva; G James; R P Bolton; K D Bardhan
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  More caution about tube feeding.

Authors:  T E Finucane; C Christmas
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  The protracted demise of medical technology. The case of intermittent positive pressure breathing.

Authors:  S Q Duffy; D E Farley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Long-term survival in patients undergoing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and jejunostomy.

Authors:  H C Wolfsen; R A Kozarek; T J Ball; D J Patterson; V A Botoman; J A Ryan
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 6.  The evolution of clinical policies.

Authors:  A S Dixon
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  Tube feeding in patients with advanced dementia: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  T E Finucane; C Christmas; K Travis
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-13       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Decision-making for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy among older adults in a community setting.

Authors:  C M Callahan; K M Haag; N N Buchanan; R Nisi
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Predictors of outcome after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a community-based study.

Authors:  C A Taylor; D E Larson; D J Ballard; L R Bergstrom; M D Silverstein; A R Zinsmeister; E P DiMagno
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Artificial feeding--solid ground, not a slippery slope.

Authors:  R Steinbrook; B Lo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-02-04       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

1.  Death and primary care.

Authors:  Christopher M Callahan; Gregory P Gramelspacher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Oral feeding options for people with dementia: a systematic review.

Authors:  Laura C Hanson; Mary Ersek; Robin Gilliam; Timothy S Carey
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Physicians' expectations of benefit from tube feeding.

Authors:  Laura C Hanson; Joanne M Garrett; Carmen Lewis; Nancy Phifer; Anne Jackman; Timothy S Carey
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.947

4.  Natural history of feeding-tube use in nursing home residents with advanced dementia.

Authors:  Sylvia Kuo; Ramona L Rhodes; Susan L Mitchell; Vincent Mor; Joan M Teno
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 4.669

5.  Is short-term percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement beneficial in acutely ill cognitively intact elderly patients? A proposed decision-making algorithm.

Authors:  Rtika R Abraham; Mohit Girotra; Jeanne Y Wei; Gohar Azhar
Journal:  Geriatr Gerontol Int       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 2.730

6.  Special considerations for endoscopists on PEG indications in older patients.

Authors:  Fabrizio Cardin
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-11-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.