Literature DB >> 1434864

Predictors of outcome after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a community-based study.

C A Taylor1, D E Larson, D J Ballard, L R Bergstrom, M D Silverstein, A R Zinsmeister, E P DiMagno.   

Abstract

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is used to provide nutrition for patients who are unable to eat but have a functionally intact gut. Clinical guidelines for PEG are uncertain and have been derived mainly from referral practices. We performed a population-based cohort study in 97 residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, referred for PEG between January 1982 and December 1988 to determine complications, duration of tube feeding, and survival. Follow-up continued until death or February 1990. Inpatient and outpatient records were reviewed to determine indications, comorbid conditions, level of consciousness, and limitations in activities of daily living. Outcomes determined after referral for PEG included type and number of complications, tube removal, and survival. Statistical methods used included Kaplan-Meier and proportional hazards regression analyses. PEG placement was successful in 94% of patients. Although complications occurred in 70% of patients, they usually were minor (88%) and most occurred within 3 months. In 24 patients, tubes were removed because eating was resumed. The probability of surviving 30 days, 1.5 years, and 4 years after referral for PEG was 78%, 35%, and 27%, respectively. The major causes of death within and after 30 days were pneumonia, heart disease, and vascular disease of the central nervous system. An increased risk of death after referral for PEG placement was associated with older age, male gender, diabetes, and specific indications for PEG. If validated in other population-based studies, these predictors of survival after referral for PEG placement could be used to identify patients with a low probability of survival who may not benefit from PEG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1434864     DOI: 10.1016/s0025-6196(12)61118-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  40 in total

1.  Withholding artificial feeding from the severely demented: merciful or immoral? Contrasts between secular and Jewish perspectives.

Authors:  J Kunin
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  [The value of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in ENT tumor patients].

Authors:  K Mantsopoulos; M Koch; J Zenk; H Iro
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a safe and effective bridge for enteral nutrition in neurological or non-neurological conditions.

Authors:  Rasim Gencosmanoglu
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Survival of geriatric patients after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in Japan.

Authors:  Yutaka Suzuki; Seryna Tamez; Akihiko Murakami; Akihiko Taira; Akihiro Mizuhara; Akira Horiuchi; Chie Mihara; Eiji Ako; Hirohito Muramatsu; Hitoshi Okano; Hitoshi Suenaga; Kazuaki Jomoto; Junya Kobayashi; Katsunari Takifuji; Kazuhiro Akiyama; Koh Tahara; Koji Onishi; Makoto Shimazaki; Masami Matsumoto; Masashi Ijima; Masato Murakami; Masato Nakahori; Michiaki Kudo; Michio Maruyama; Mikako Takahashi; Naohiro Washizawa; Shigeru Onozawa; Satoshi Goshi; Satoyoshi Yamashita; Shigeki Ono; Shin Imazato; Shinji Nishiwaki; Shuichirou Kitahara; Takao Endo; Takao Iiri; Takeshi Nagahama; Takuto Hikichi; Tatsuya Mikami; Tetsuo Yamamoto; Tetsushi Ogawa; Tomoko Ogawa; Tomoyuki Ohta; Toshifumi Matsumoto; Toshiroh Kura; Tsutomu Kikuchi; Tsuyoshi Iwase; Tsuyotoshi Tsuji; Yukio Nishiguchi; Mitsuyoshi Urashima
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Laparoscopically assisted percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Authors:  G D Croaker; A S Najmaldin
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Long-term outcomes of patients receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes.

Authors:  L Rabeneck; N P Wray; N J Petersen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Cost analysis of long-term feeding by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in cancer patients in an Italian health district.

Authors:  S Sartori; L Trevisani; D Tassinari; G Gilli; I Nielsen; A Maestri; V Abbasciano
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Placement of gastrostomy tubes in patients with ventriculoperitoneal shunts does not result in increased incidence of shunt infection or decreased survival.

Authors:  Brent E Roeder; Adnan Said; Mark Reichelderfer; Deepak V Gopal
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Trends in the use of feeding tubes in North Carolina hospitals.

Authors:  Carmen L Lewis; Christopher E Cox; Joanne M Garrett; Laura Hanson; George M Holmes; Ann Howard; Timothy S Carey
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Enteral long-term nutrition via percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in 210 patients: a four-year prospective study.

Authors:  C Löser; S Wolters; U R Fölsch
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.